The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 29, 2012, 12:12 PM   #1
Gdawgs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 656
Using heavy 9mm bullets in 380

The question came up a while back if you can use heavy 9mm bullets in 380. I mentioned that when you seat heavier bullets in 380, they bulge the case because they are too long. I was loading up some 9mm today and came across a 380 case mixed in. So I figued I'd make up a dummy round with a heavy bullet to show what it looks like. This is a 140 gr bullet in the 380 case. As you can see, the case is bulged out a fair amount in the middle. This will prevent the case from chambering. And that is why we stick to lighter bullets with the 380.

Gdawgs is offline  
Old August 29, 2012, 03:27 PM   #2
Stressfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,497
Even if one could get a heavier bullet to chamber - due to longer bullet length could one even get enough powder into the case as well (without compressing) to make it even remotely effective or even safe to fire?

Can't say I'd be all that eager to put my little .380 through that.
__________________
"The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank" - Montgomery Scott

Last edited by Stressfire; August 29, 2012 at 03:32 PM.
Stressfire is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03281 seconds with 8 queries