|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 17, 2013, 02:54 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Bloomberg: Just when you thought he couldn't push for more Nanny state...
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/08/...tes-residents/
Now he wants all residents of public housing to submit to mandatory fingerprinting. It's just a little liberty, to be sacrificed in the name of public safety. No big deal, right? This does not feel like the country in which I grew up. Founders would be disgusted. We really should revive tar and feathers... |
August 17, 2013, 03:15 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 25, 2011
Posts: 1,755
|
So...because they can't keep traditional locks operational the solution is to put in more expensive harder to repair and replace systems that also infringe on general privacy?
Are there even scanners that could hold up to that volume of use under real world conditions? |
August 17, 2013, 03:51 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
He came up with this idea (or rather, came out with it) during a Q&A about restrictions a judge had imposed on NYC's Stop and Frisk program...
|
August 17, 2013, 05:43 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Guess he just can't wait until they get arrested?
What a profiling racist he's turning out to be. |
August 17, 2013, 06:05 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Well, this went off the rails quickly. Some of you should know better.
Closed. PS -FYI folks, the close was due to some deleted posts predicting a bad end. Seen it before.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens Last edited by Glenn E. Meyer; August 18, 2013 at 02:04 PM. |
|
|