|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 23, 2009, 11:03 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: February 21, 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 77
|
Walmart vanguard for 350?
My local walmart has these guns on cleareance with a tan stock with splashes of black for $350.00 in 7mm, .300, .30-06, and .270. Is this really a good buy for these rifles?
|
December 23, 2009, 11:19 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2008
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 441
|
That is an excellent buy on a quality rifle that will shoot well and give you years of quality performance !
|
December 23, 2009, 11:21 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2005
Posts: 1,276
|
Get it in .270....
|
December 24, 2009, 07:04 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 6, 2009
Posts: 360
|
That is a very good buy on the vanguard as they have a great reputation and the action is made by Howa.
|
December 24, 2009, 08:14 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
|
Yes, get the 270, so we can get a thread how you wasted your money if you could have gotten a magnum for the same price, how the 7mm is the superior 270, and that the 30-06 has taken any animal on this and all neighboring planets.
BTW which Walmart is that, close enough for me to drive to?
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying. |
December 24, 2009, 08:55 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,242
|
No real world difference between the three cartridges (.270, 7mm RM, and .30-06) they will all take the same game very easily. Good rifle and I wouldn't hesitate to buy one even at Wal-Mart.
|
December 24, 2009, 12:54 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
|
Hey, At that price, any one would do. If it were me, I would go ahead and get the big 300. Not much in NA you cant bring down with ease. Shoots as flat as any of them (apples to apples) and more energy downrange.
I hear a lot of people on here complain about the 300.........too much recoil.....too much meat loss etc. Just remember the the 300 in hunting configuration is not designed to be shot from the bench all day. Learn your proper techniques (pull tight to "pocket", press cheek firmly on stock) and you wont have a problem. If you forget, the rifle will remind you quickly. As for meat loss, Put the bullet through the boiler room and not the sholders and you really dont loose much meat at all. I reload to keep the price down, but the 300 isnt really that badly price. About $30 a box at walmart for coreloked. 7mm is about the same. 270 and 06 are $5 to $10 cheaper. Reloading price difference between 06 and 300 is about $1 a box.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it. |
December 24, 2009, 03:41 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2004
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 510
|
old Sneaky Pete here: I got one in 30-06 and the included target 3 shot was SUB 1 MOA( 0.568" ctc). The '06 ammo is real easy to come by and as said will take anything short of a Kodiac(maybe if your a really good shot????) THANX--SNEAKY
__________________
A Slave is one who is Forced to act for the benefit of another--TAXPAYER--47% of Americans Don't pay taxes. A little bit of Slavery is stll Slavery--- M/sgt GENO |
|
|