The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 30, 2013, 11:18 AM   #1
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
284 Winchester

I need to put together 200 rounds of .284 Winchester ammo for a Model 88 Winchester. I'll be using Nosler 150 grain Ballistic Tips. I have IMR 4350, IMR 4831, & Hodgdn SC 4831. If it were a bolt gun I wouldn't be asking but since I've never loaded for an 88 give me some advice. Thanks & God Bless........Creeker
LAH is offline  
Old March 30, 2013, 07:20 PM   #2
gundog5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 116
I had one years ago and it was a pretty solid gun but it sounds as if this one is pretty new to you. my nosler manual shows H-4831 52.0 to 56.0 max and IMR 4350 45.5 to 49.5 max. I would stick to mid power loads until have time to work up loads to higher velocity/power. Velocity is close for both powders with no mention of imr4831.
gundog5 is offline  
Old March 30, 2013, 08:31 PM   #3
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
You know Gundog Nosler's max load is less than IMR's starting load. I know the 150 grain bullets each source use are different but there's sure a lot of difference between the two.
LAH is offline  
Old March 30, 2013, 10:00 PM   #4
GeauxTide
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,423
The 150 NBT is mighty long for that short neck. You'll find the 154 Hornady just as accurate and half the cost. With your powder choices, IMR4350 would be the right one. My 280 has about the same capacity and loves RL-19 and 140s.
GeauxTide is offline  
Old March 31, 2013, 12:38 PM   #5
gundog5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 116
Yeh, it drives me crazy to. I have seven different manuals and try to stick to the one who makes the bullet, but when I can't find the powder I want to use i'll look in other manuals and have never had issues from pressure. Makes you wonder why such a wide veration in powder charges. My guess has always been that some are just more conservitive then others.
gundog5 is offline  
Old March 31, 2013, 09:28 PM   #6
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
Finished sizing them.


LAH is offline  
Old April 1, 2013, 09:05 PM   #7
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
The cases were long after sizing so to the trimmer we go.



Outside/inside neck

LAH is offline  
Old April 2, 2013, 12:36 AM   #8
david_r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2013
Posts: 131
LAH,
I have nothing to add to this. I just wanted to say, cool gun you have. I have one in 308 [yawn] that I really love. I have a web snapshot of wisenersinc.com model 88/100 information they used to have published. It gives a lot of information on these models but unfortunately most of the pictures are missing. They used to make replacement magazines on the original winchester tooling but I don't see them on their current website.
david_r is offline  
Old April 2, 2013, 09:13 AM   #9
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
Thanks David.

Dirty primer pockets



Clean
LAH is offline  
Old April 2, 2013, 05:15 PM   #10
pathdoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
Makes you wonder why such a wide veration in powder charges. My guess has always been that some are just more conservitive then others.

If the powder maker is listing generic no-brand-name-mentioned data for a given bullet weight in a specific calibre, they are constrained to listing a load safe for all the brands they tested of that weight, which might handicap some projectiles more than others.

If they are listing specific data for specific bullets from a specific manufacturer which are significantly lower than the manufacturer's loads, I honestly have no idea. Perhaps their test rifle or their pressure gun really is that sensitive?
pathdoc is offline  
Old April 3, 2013, 04:06 PM   #11
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
Ready for primers



Primed on my old 450 Dillon

LAH is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 08:56 PM   #12
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
Loaded a few with 52 grains of IMR 4350 with an OAL of 2.800". They functioned well & here's the fired cases.
LAH is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 02:20 AM   #13
david_r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2013
Posts: 131
Where's the target? And how about a picture of the rifle while you're at it?
david_r is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 11:53 AM   #14
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
No target, I only shot these for function. Here's the rifle.




LAH is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 12:55 PM   #15
Tom Matiska
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2000
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pa
Posts: 1,029
Quote:
If it were a bolt gun I wouldn't be asking.....
The 88 is a bolt that is lever operated. No need for concern.

My only knock on the 88 is the action is about as loooong as short action gets. For hands on carry in brush it gets a little nose heavy pretty quick and winds up on the shoulder just before bambi surprises you. The long path between the click of the trigger and the pin hitting the primer hurts offhand shooting. Some 88's are ok, or not, but very few are great offhand
__________________
A gun is like a parachute... when you need one you usually need it pretty bad...
Tom Matiska is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 01:21 PM   #16
david_r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2013
Posts: 131
Sweet. Not the pressed acorns and oak leaf and not 308. I would say that's a keeper
david_r is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 04:05 PM   #17
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
Yes it locks just like a bolt action with it's rotating lug. This I understand even though it's not my rifle & I've never owned one. The 284 I was referring to as a bolt gun was this:


LAH is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 08:09 PM   #18
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
After much thought I decided to load these with 51.5 grains of the IMR 4350.



No chance of a double charge. HEE HEE
LAH is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 09:47 PM   #19
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
Ready for the Ballistic Tips



This is how they look


The two hundred
LAH is offline  
Old April 6, 2013, 12:31 PM   #20
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2000
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,073
Pretty

Nice job.
__________________
I am Pro-Rights (on gun issues).
Dave R is offline  
Old April 6, 2013, 02:04 PM   #21
LAH
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2002
Location: In The Hardwoods
Posts: 1,188
Thanks Dave.
LAH is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07664 seconds with 8 queries