September 4, 2007, 06:20 PM | #26 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
What gets me is the attitude that you can practice on your own and "perfect" this skill over time. With all due respect nobody but nobody would suggest that you could become an olympic level boxer by yourself in a basement gym, but some are virtually suggesting that as it applies to self defense.
I have also coached soccer for 25+ years. The level of skill needed to disarm someone is higher than that needed to be a decent HS level soccer player. I defy anyone to take a weekend class, practice in the back yard for a few months, and then see if they could play rec league soccer at a HS level. The hours of training it takes to be even remotely proficient in any martial art is incredible. You can go to the range for two hours a week and be fairly proficient in use of handguns, it takes more like two hours a day for at least 2 or 3 years to become proficient at a martial art. I apologise in advance if my post offends by it's tone. The fact is I get annoyed when the hours and hours I have spent training gets belittled by those who think it is easy or simple. Besides, if it was easy my scars wouldn't mean so much and I couldn't impress they ladies. |
September 4, 2007, 06:55 PM | #27 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
|
There's a disconnect in the discussion. I think the problem is that no one's saying that attackers come in all varieties.
Yes, one can learn effective techniques for disarming an attacker in a single session. Yes, with practice, one can use these techniques effectively against some attackers. But it's just like any other kind of self-defense. If you come up against a strong, skilled, determined attacker your chances of using techniques learned in a one day class to neutralize him are slim to none.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
September 4, 2007, 08:52 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
|
|
September 4, 2007, 09:08 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
And meanwhile, no one has taken a stab at answering the question I asked in post #19 of this thread:
Now, given that reality and none other (not the fantasy world we all wish were true!), what would you suggest this 18 year old going off to college do about personal defense? 1) Learn nothing at all. 2) Take a basic, reality-based class in defense skills, increase her personal awareness, practice those skills, and learn more when she is able to do so. pax |
September 4, 2007, 09:10 PM | #30 | |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Quote:
If a victim of domestic violence asks me how to protect herself I would not hesitate to suggest any one of a dozen good handguns, which she could learn to use in the course of a weekend. After 2 or 3 years of training 10-12 hours a week that same woman, were she in good physical shape, might be able to defend herself against a violent man. It's a little like cars. It doesn't take that much practice before you can go pick up some groceries, but that doesn't mean you're going out on the F-1 circuit either. Pax, of course she should take a REALITY based self defense courrse. I am just suggesting that a course that teaches disarming the first day out is not reality based. |
|
September 4, 2007, 09:11 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
Justme ~
I'm sorry that it offends you to be told this, but it is possible to learn basic disarms in a single weekend -- given the proper mindset and a commitment to practice. This is a far cry from "becoming proficient in a martial art." You can keep your it-takes-years belief on that one, for I agree with you. But learning how to leverage a gun out of an attacker's hand and shoot him with it (or with your own more reliable weapon)? It's not rocket science. Anyone can do that -- given the willingness to learn. pax |
September 4, 2007, 09:33 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
In answer to Pax's question: Obviously some training is better than none. But you still must acknowledge the fact that without practice, the technique means nothing. I think some people believe that these techniques are like knowledge, once you learn it, you don't forget. You can file the technique away until you need it. That isn't true. You have to practice and refine the technique for it to be useful. |
|
September 4, 2007, 09:38 PM | #33 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Lurper, a person does not have to be an IPSA champion in order to effectively use a firearm, which is pretty lucky for the vast majority of us. That was my point about the cars, you don't have to be a F-1 champion in order to pick the kids up from school or go get some groceries.
By your definition not one in ten cops are proficient with firearms, yet they seem to get along just fine with a few exceptions from time to time. |
September 4, 2007, 09:52 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 783
|
Quote:
|
|
September 4, 2007, 09:56 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: September 18, 2005
Posts: 47
|
That's why guns have been known as "The Equalizer".
There is no equality in a bare-hands on gun situation, so I think the gun discussion is irrelevant to the OT. (I was responding to Justme's comment) C
__________________
Seeking Knowledge, Hoping for Wisdom |
September 4, 2007, 10:00 PM | #36 | ||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
|
Quote:
Quote:
This gets back to what I said in my earlier post, there are levels of attackers. A one day class in disarm techniques won't let you defeat a martial arts expert or a strong, fast, skilled, determined attacker. A one day class in handgun techniques will not let you defeat a national champion. BUT, either one will give you tools that you can effectively use against the less "elite". If your goal is to be the best, a one day class and some practice will not cut it. If your goal is to be better than average--or even a LOT better than average, then that's a different story.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
||
September 4, 2007, 10:47 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 13, 2006
Location: Calgary Alberta, Canada
Posts: 307
|
Psychology of the defender and the attacker are as important as the training.
You take a girl off the high school soccer pitch and make her determined to win her confrontation and put her up against a rapist who will swing either way and I'll put my money on the girl. A person who is determined to not go down will put up so much of a stink that it will take a very disciplined attacker to put them down.
__________________
"If you put one in the snot locker, it doesn't matter what calibre it is". |
September 4, 2007, 10:48 PM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2006
Posts: 943
|
Quote:
However John, you are correct in the final assesment you need only be better than your attacker. |
|
September 4, 2007, 11:30 PM | #39 |
Member
Join Date: July 18, 2005
Posts: 61
|
could a smaller female disarm a larger male attacker yes i have personally met 3 who could (all had studied aikido, aikijutsu ect. for 10+ years)
after only a 2 day class no! practice makes perfect in martial arts. |
September 4, 2007, 11:47 PM | #40 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,929
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
September 4, 2007, 11:50 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
Yes, you can teach a 1 or 2 day class to your average person and give them techniques for self-defense and/or disarming an attacker. Out of a class of 20, however, I'd guess that probably 2-4 will dedicate themselves to practicing consistently over the next three months or longer. 6-8 will practice unevenly over the next two months and the rest will show a friend or family member what they learned, maybe fool around with it a little and then slide back into routine life.
There must be a caveat with these types of classes however. That some people will be bigger, stronger and better than you are. When this happens, you need at least one or two things you can do as "backup" plans.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
September 4, 2007, 11:55 PM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
Quote:
BillCA's post makes good sense. People with the right attitude toward training are rare. That's not a failure of the training, but of the student. pax |
|
September 5, 2007, 12:43 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 2007
Location: Indiana/Indpls Metro Area
Posts: 318
|
Re: Pax
In answer to your question, I would suggest that you not give ANYONE this foolish false sense of security by suggesting that they can now defend against a determined attacker because they took a one-day feel good class. It's irresponsible and it's dangerous, and can lead to taking greater risks. |
September 5, 2007, 12:45 PM | #44 | |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Quote:
|
|
September 5, 2007, 01:02 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
9mm ~
So you're taking Option 1, continue in ignorance? pax |
September 5, 2007, 01:13 PM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 1999
Location: Knoxville, in the Free State of Tennesse
Posts: 4,190
|
Quote:
Steve Tarani's classes also are a few days in length and the techniques are ones that can be easily picked up and used if (there are those magic words again) followed through with rigorous practice. The basic and critical information can be conveyed in a weekend. Taking that information and making it instinctive and competent requires repetitive, quality practice. Strangely, that's what Tarani, Ayoob, Awerbuck, Rogers, and most every other instructor teach: the basic skills are easy, making them instinctive requires dedication. Wait . . . isn't that what Pax has been saying all along? Wait |
|
September 5, 2007, 01:20 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Pax - you are fighting against a tendency of gun boards. Every question must have a 0,1 answer. It has to be absolutist and macho.
It's like the OC debate. Since there are some folks who can fight after being sprayed - NO ONE SHOULD CARRY OC AS IT MAKES THEM OVERCONFIDENT Since some folks aren't stopped by a 22 LR or a 32 ACP NO ONE SHOULD CARRY A MOUSE GUN AS IT MAKES THEM OVERCONFIDENT Thus a young woman or an old man for that case is better off not being able to disengage or stop a reasonable amount of attackers as some on the list think they are super physical specimens. Nor do I think that most folks who take such courses think they are completely confident against all attackers. They have learned something. It's funny - how many posts start with some guy, saying "I'm 6'6" and 250 and most folks don't mess with me". Are they a touch overconfident as compared to a little guy with a knife?
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
September 5, 2007, 01:25 PM | #48 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,066
|
Is it better to be totally ignorant or to have your basic ignorance increased? Believing you can disarm anyone after a few hours of class, no matter how many hours of private practice, means you have increased instead of decreased your ignorance.
Anyone who thinks they can disarm an angry sociopath is deluded and has obviously never spent much time dealing with violent people. I have trained for decades and am under no delusions that I could disarm anyone. I drive daily but I don't think I could take a weekend class and then race on the F-1 circuit, but in my mind that is what is being suggested as possible. Anyway, so a 125lb woman disarms an angry sociopathy, what now? Think he really needed the gun in the first place? If you answered yes, go sit in the corner. If it was possible to reliably disarm someone a gun would be worthless in self defense. Why does everyone think that sociopaths are easy to disarm but law abiding gun owners are not? That makes no sense. BTW I am 5'8" and carry a keltec .32, which I don't think anyone could take from me without getting shot. Oddly enough nobody ever messes with me either. I could be because I have 10-15 first cousins who are mean bastards. |
September 5, 2007, 01:31 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
Justme ~
The Boston Strangler was really easy to defeat. ANY level of resistance against him, from making a noise to fighting back in any way, would cause him to run off. He got his jollies out of killing non resistant women. Ted Bundy never kidnapped anyone who did not get willingly into his car with him (except those who were bludgeoned into unconsciousness while sleeping, and had no chance either to comply or resist). Any resistance at all will generally cause the most dangerous types of serial rapists/murderers -- the experienced guys who have done it again and again and again, escalating from rape to murder, and with plans to keep going without getting caught -- to leave the woman alone. Provided, that is, that the resistance begins early enough: only one woman survived without crippling injury after getting into Bundy's car. Any resistance at all while in public was enough to chase him off. Waiting until they were inside the car, she was dead. Non-educated resistance (flailing or striking the torso; yelling, etc) might stop those guys, but it will generally make the non-"professional" rapists angrier and more apt to do serious damage up to and including murder. But against the guys who intended murder in the first place, even non-educated resistance is often surprisingly effective. Capable, educated resistance will generally deflect the majority of date rapes and other "social situation" sexual assaults, provided the woman has educated herself enough to understand the social dynamics of what is going on and does not stop to argue or discuss once she has begun to make her escape. Simply knowing the escapes from common grabs, coupled with a basic understanding of date-rape psychology, may enable her to make good an escape that she would not have been able to make without that knowledge. There are a lot of studies that show an unarmed woman who physically resists a rape or sexual assault is more likely to be injured than those who do not resist. However, a closer look at the data generally show that a majority of women who were injured and also fought back generally were injured first, then began fighting back, rather than the other way around. In other words, it was the injury that provoked her to fight, rather than her fighting that provoked the injury. I hope it is clear that I am not arguing for ignorance here. Obviously more training is better. Obviously a solid mindset is better than a flabby one and an assertive attitude is better than an aggressive one or a passive one. What I am arguing against, very strenuously, is the ridiculous notion that women can't learn some basic physical actions that will increase their safety in any time frame short of "years." I strongly detest the fallacy that unless you are (physically and emotionally) prepared to take on the worst of the worst in an extended altercation, unless you dedicate years of your life to learning this stuff and spend half your waking hours thinking about it, well you might as well forget it and learn nothing at all. That's the foolishness I'm arguing against. If you heard me arguing against getting more training than a weekend, or if you heard me saying that a single day of training without a good mindset and without continued practice, would be enough to take on every guy who ever landed on Death Row -- well, if you heard that, you heard wrong. That's not what I said. I'm not arguing for false or misplaced confidence. I AM arguing that head-in-the-sand ignorance is a bad thing, training a good thing -- and training plus the commitment to practice and learn more is best of all. pax |
September 5, 2007, 01:35 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2007
Posts: 884
|
I was into Martial arts for years. My ex-wife (tough character) was only a yellow belt when she took a two day course in the use of a kubaton (spelling?). I was mortified at how proficient she was, especially after being her practice dummy for a few weeks. She took it seriously - that's the key.
__________________
Only the ignorant find ignorance to be bliss. Only those of us who know better will suffer from it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|