|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 27, 2004, 01:12 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2000
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,328
|
Hmm - the dimes thing intrests me, 4V50 Gary. Where did they place them - behind the ball? Ahead? Not sure why it would reduce recoil... ??? Extra room for gas expansion?
But wow - 30 cents a shot plus powder and lead in the mid 1800s! Bet not many of them made it a standard load...
__________________
What part of "... shall not be infringed..." don't you understand? |
January 2, 2005, 11:07 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: December 5, 2004
Posts: 19
|
try a belgium made 4 gage shotgun they were sold all over the place cheap I have one i bought in the early 80s for 60 buck s with a standard load the recoil will knock you down but boy will it smash targets
|
January 9, 2005, 02:33 PM | #28 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2004
Posts: 8
|
over time
Interesting idea, but eventually you may have to decide if you'll ever really shoot this cannon well. I don't expect to ever become a Master with my 30-30s but if I can shoot such decently and often plus encourage my sons to enjoy my guns, then that's worth quite a lot to me. If they dislike shooting because of the kick-your-head-off recoil, then (for me), what's the point?
|
January 9, 2005, 10:00 PM | #29 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,838
|
The dimes were placed into the barrel before the introduction of powder and left there (I don't think they wasted thirty cents a shot). Can't shoot out the dimes if they're below the powder. I suppose the dimes came out whenever the gun was cleaned, but afterwards, was probably dropped right back in there.
Oh, the term "Three cheers and a tiger" formally meant three buckshot and one ball and wasn't originally three dimes into the barrel.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
February 15, 2005, 02:10 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: February 10, 2005
Location: Woodland, CA
Posts: 25
|
An Abusive BP Gun?
I had a 54 cal. Sharon Trade Rifle Kit produced before Hall Sharon lost the company that I thought was a bargain (bought cheap because the manager of the store didn't know what it was). Accuracy was good but anything above 50 grains of powder caused it to kill on one end and maim on the other. Now I'm not a little guy and at the time I was shooting a two band Enfield, a three band Springfield, a musketoon(all 58 cal.) and a Smith Carbine in competition but something about the stock configuration on that Sharon made it the most abusive rifle (bar none) that I have ever shot.
__________________
No matter how bad the situation... No matter how dark the future seems... There is always someone to turn to... |
February 15, 2005, 10:31 PM | #31 |
Junior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Posts: 12
|
I had a .50 armsport that was a real lightweight rifle- I shot 3F 100 gr.(I know-I know! )(and it did shoot accurate with that load- after the flames cleared! )out of it regularly and it kicked like a mule with lead feet- always got a big cheek bruise and took ribbing at work the next day-who'd you fight?
|
February 16, 2005, 02:37 PM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: February 15, 2005
Posts: 15
|
How about this?
http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.co...00139R44003470 or this http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.co...ku=00215PR4300 Just to stay on the safe side with any CVA, Traditions, or Winchester muzzleloader, I would stay away from heavy charges of powder (anything over 100 grains), say like Pyrodex and especailly with Triple Seven powder, and heavy bullet weights. |
|
|