May 17, 2010, 04:36 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Posts: 131
|
Casting bullets
I am about to start casting my own bullets for the first time. I intend to buy 6 cavity Lee molds. I will need molds for 9 MM luger, 45 ACP and 44 Remington Mag.
I have plenty of W231 powder and large pistol primers on hand and would like to not have to buy any more powders or primers unless absolutely necessary and highly recommended. I intend to use a Lee sizing system. I hear a lot about using Alox tumbling as a lube and that it is very messy. Would pan lubing be a cleaner and a better way to lube the bullets? In keeping with the above I sure would like to get some recommendations for bullet molds: - In view of my above limitations what would be the best bullet mold configurations to buy? I seem to favor the 200 grain flat nose configuration for both the 45 ACP and 44 Remington mag bullets ? - I can't find a 6 cavity mold for the 9 MM luger so I have been thinking of using the 2 cavity 120 grain truncated cone mold. I am not crazy about this mold. Can you folks come up with something better? I am not sure there is anything else. |
May 17, 2010, 06:58 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
Also, years ago, I used a Lyman truncated cone mold (again, 9mm), and hated the bullets it produced. They cycled well through the action, but were difficult to pick-up and manipulate in the hand loading process. They seem to squeeze (slip from), out of my fingers when trying to pick them up more than round nose bullets. Lastly, flat-nose bullets may not feed well in your .45 Auto. 230 grain round nose always functioned well for my .45's, although I have good results with the RCBS semi-wadcutter meant for .45's. |
|
May 17, 2010, 07:16 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 1,527
|
Be sure to slug your bore before you buy any molds. You want to make sure that the boolit is gonna fit properly.
__________________
~~IllinoisCoyoteHunter~~ ~NRA LIFE MEMBER~ ~NRA CERTIFIED INSTRUCTOR~ |
May 17, 2010, 07:36 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2010
Posts: 330
|
I'd also keep to round nose profiles in the beginning, for semi-autos, simply to reduce any frustration when you start shoot your first efforts. I've successfully shot a lot of round-nosed flat points in my 1911, but Lee's offering looks like not much ogive with a pretty flat end. Their 452-228-1R looks like it'd work. The only 9mm I cast is Lee's 102 round nose for a 380 Colt Gov't. Keep it simple in the beginning. You can experiment after you get experience. You'll accumulate more molds as you go as this can become an addiction.
Edit: if you're just starting, get Lyman's "Cast Bullet Handbook", a wealth of info for beginner and veteran alike. |
May 17, 2010, 07:42 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: July 21, 2007
Location: centraL pa. on the west bank of the susquehanna river
Posts: 22
|
plaz,
tumble lube designs don't need sizing...cast 'em, tumble-lube 'em and load 'em. i have a .45 cal, 230 gr truncated cone lee mold i like a lot. these designs are preface by the letters "TL". the 9mm is a 124 gr round nose or truncated cone design; the 44 spec/mag is a 240 gr swc and the .45's are available in 200 swc and 230 gr rn or tc designs. all are available as 6-cavity designs...go on lee's web-site to get the numbers. http://www.natchezss.com/ has them all. i love lee molds since discovering bullshop's sprue plate lube; it stops lead smearing if the sprue is cut before the lead solidifies, thus preventing galling of the mold block's top. inexpensive and effective stuff. here's a link:http://bullshop.gunloads.com/tbs_lube.htm welcome to the fraternity. budman |
May 17, 2010, 09:40 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,299
|
Actually, I use the TL 356-124-2R mould for 9mm, and it drops at .360. I use the great push through Lee sizer to get it down to .358 for 38 Special, and 356 for 9mm, works great.
Best resource for casting, castboolits.gunloads.com. |
May 17, 2010, 09:47 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Quote:
|
|
May 17, 2010, 10:54 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
|
The price of LEE's sizer is very attractive, but I found their method of lubricating unsatisfactory. One try with the LEE and I was convinced that I'd made the wrong choice. Now, I use an old-school Lyman 450 with a Midway heated base. My lube is hard at room temperature and the finished bullets are clean and dry.
I still have the little used LEE sizer kits in .357 and .451 and will let the pair go to a good home for $10 + actual shipping. PM if interested. |
May 17, 2010, 11:08 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 1,527
|
If you decide you really like casting and shoot a bit, then chances are you will end up with a lubrisizer (Star, Lyman, RCBS, Saeco, etc). They are a much "cleaner" alternative and I have found the Lee TL system to be marginal. For starting out, it gets you going cheap...but if you think you will like it then go ahead and spend the extra $$$ and get a lubrisizer. That is my 2 cents from personal experience (and many of my friends that cast as well).
__________________
~~IllinoisCoyoteHunter~~ ~NRA LIFE MEMBER~ ~NRA CERTIFIED INSTRUCTOR~ |
May 17, 2010, 11:56 AM | #10 | |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Quote:
May I suggest a standard weight boolit for both calibers? The standard weight bullet for the 45 is 230 gr, and the standard weight bullet for the 44 is the 245/250 gr. What is your reason for going light for caliber in both cases? |
|
May 17, 2010, 12:15 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Posts: 131
|
The reason I have been selecting light bullets is because I am limiting myself to using W231 powder. Can I use the standard bullet sizes with W231?
|
May 17, 2010, 02:18 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 1,527
|
Quote:
__________________
~~IllinoisCoyoteHunter~~ ~NRA LIFE MEMBER~ ~NRA CERTIFIED INSTRUCTOR~ Last edited by IllinoisCoyoteHunter; May 17, 2010 at 02:24 PM. |
|
May 17, 2010, 02:32 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
|
The current Hodgdon data show loads with W 231…
9mm Luger to 125 gr FMGMy old Lyman Cast Bullet Handbook lists W 231 loads 9mm Luger, No Lyman cast bullet loads with W 231As IllinoisCoyoteHunter said: "Remember that 231 is not a magnum powder, as it burns too fast." |
May 17, 2010, 03:05 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2007
Location: Tabor City , NC.
Posts: 1,969
|
Excellent advise
The only thing I can add is cast& try a few before "MASS" producing anything!!
__________________
GP100man |
May 17, 2010, 04:10 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
|
I can recomend a powder for the .44 mag cast lead loads. I cast, and load for .41 mag with lead. I followed an old family friend's advice and bought some Acurate #9. It was a bit more expensive than Alliant 2400. I like the #9 way better. It is much cleaner, and has way less flash.
I would recomend the Lyman Pistol and Revolver loading manual. It has the most listed loads for .44 mag, and special, as with all other handgun calibers. It also has a detailed chapter on casting lead.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you. |
May 17, 2010, 06:15 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Problem is guns are differant, like Jacketed bullets, some guns like some cast bullets and don't like others.
Some of mine guns I had to go through several molds to find out what the gun liked. And I dont like multi-caliber molds for target shooting, just because the bullets come from the same mold, dont mean all the bullets are the same. When I cast bullets for my Model 52 Smith, I only use on cavity of a 4 cavity mold. I'd recommend staying away from 6 cavity molds. They are heavy, and you'll find you can cast faster with a 4 cavity, and with some heavier bullets you can cast faster with a 2 cavity. Some bullets you need two molds of the same caliber if you arnt too picky about how accurate they are, For example I have 2 - two cavity molds (same brand & same bullet) because that 500 grn bullet heats up the mold too fast, you need to switch them out. Some of the long bullets bend before they get cooled. It isnt gonna take long before you end up with 20 - 30 molds, casting is habit forming, but a lot of fun.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
May 17, 2010, 09:33 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
|
Ok, here's my experience after trying several boolit profile/weights.
The truncated cone 124gr absolutely did NOT work in my three 9mm's. Massive tumbling and inaccuracy. After pulling most of my hair out, a kind fellow pointed me to the Lee 358-125-RF mold, sized to .358 and *lightly* lubed with ALOX. Now the planets are in their proper orbit and the sun is shining down on my shooting. Seems 9mm has some really shallow and fast rifling. Send a boolit sized wrong down the barrel, and you'll get it skidding along like a toboggan on teflon. As a new caster (as I was a few months ago) I'd skip the 6 hole mold. Get a 2 hole, and you'll be surprised how many you can make in just a couple hours. |
May 18, 2010, 01:43 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2001
Location: Oshkosh wi.
Posts: 3,055
|
Plaz, you've got a lot of info from the others. Here's my take.
The Lee 6 cav. molds are made better than the 1 and 2 cav molds. They DO require separate handles, the 1&2 cavs. come with handles. The cam operated sprue plate is a plus, you don't need to whack the sprue plate. As for the contention that each cavity will make a different bullet, not in my experience. At least not as to weight or diameter. I'm satisfied with the accuracy of bullets from all 6 cavs. to not try to mark each bullet, then run tests to determine if one cav. is bad. My eyes and old age won't let me shoot good enough to see a difference. Lee molds are NOT cut with a cherry. They are lathe turned with a boring bar. Using a CNC lathe, the mold is spun, with a programmed boring bar held to precise tolerances, the same for each cavity. This produces less run-out for each cavity, resulting in more uniform cavities. As to weight, the Lee 6 cav. weighs much less than a Lyman 4 cavity, about HALF! I can do l-o-n-g casting sessions with a Lee 6 cav., which will produce a pile of bullets. 2 hours will get me 700 45 TCTL 230 grain bullets. I just got a 230 truncated cone 6 cav. tumble lube bullet mold. The first few range trips have convinced me this is a very accurate bullet. At least in my SA 45 1911. I also have a .452 200 RF Lee 6 cav. that shoots just great. As for 9mm the 124 2 r is the standard nose shape for 9mm. Just about any 9mm will shoot it just fine. I have 2 9mm molds, the 125 TCTL is for my 357 sig. I went halves with a buddy for the 124 2R, for his glock 9. It makse a super nice bullet, shoots good in his glock 19. As for the Lee tumble lube being messy, if by that you mean they always feel a bit sticky, then yes that's true. But it WORKS!
__________________
The more people I meet, the more I love my dog They're going to get their butts kicked over there this election. How come people can't spell and use words correctly? |
May 18, 2010, 03:41 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2005
Posts: 2,017
|
Quote:
I also have to go along with the 2-cav suggestion that chris made. 6-cav's are nice for volume--no doubt about that. But you'd be surprised how many bullets you can crank out in an hour with just the 2-cav mold. I did about 160 in an hour yesterday with a rifle 2-cav mold, and that includes melt time for my alloy, sizing and seating gas checks, lubing, and standing on-end to dry. Include lolly-gaging and going into the house to fill my coffee mug, and I could have easily doubled that amount. But I'm not one to be in a real big hurry where my reloading is concerned--I'm usually into pleasure, consistency, and leisure afternoons, not volume.
__________________
"Why is is called Common Sense when it seems so few actually possess it?" Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. |
|
May 18, 2010, 08:55 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 30, 2009
Posts: 136
|
I've been using Lee's 358-105 sized to .357 in my 9mm with W231, loads and shoot fine.
|
May 18, 2010, 10:32 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Posts: 131
|
Am I to gather from some of the responses that round nose bullets would be more succesful in my gun than other bullet configurations, such as flat top or truncated cone etc.?
Also since I am new at casting, is this a way of keeping it simple at the beginning? |
June 27, 2010, 11:56 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: July 21, 2007
Location: centraL pa. on the west bank of the susquehanna river
Posts: 22
|
plaz,
truncated cone designs may possibly have issues with feeding, but i've had nothing but good luck with them in s&w, star, ruger and browning models for both feeding and accuracy. round-nose bullets performed well, too...take your pick. i just received a 6-cavity lee tumble lube round-nose design...i believe i ordered the truncated cone version, but it really makes no difference. budman |
June 27, 2010, 01:03 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
A six cavity mould, whether iron or aluminum, when poured is heavy. Personally I find a sixer tiring to use for long stretches. A two cavity is easier to hold and use, and, I'll betcha, after an hour of casting you will be about the same in numbers of bullets cast with a 2-er as a 6-er. And, the twos are much less expensive.
|
|
|