|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 17, 2013, 11:56 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: August 8, 2008
Posts: 45
|
Time for the big name mfgs. to turn up the heat
Every body has seen the recent news stories about several gun product manufacturers deciding not to sell their products to government entities that ban those products from their citizens. I attended gun control bill hearings in Annapolis, MD ( MD is the home of Beretta USA) and a Beretta rep. gave very compelling testimony about how the draconian legislation being proposed here will effect them. I think we are reaching critical mass (just heard this morning that Colorado is on a rampage to take it's citizens gun rights) and think it is time for the big names to step up. I know business is usually reluctant to get into politics for fear of losing customers ( in this case government entities) but lets face it their US civilian market looks like it will be shrinking over night with the stroke of a pen. It is time for Glock, S&W, Ruger, HK, Win., Rem., Fed., et.al. to band together and tell the Feds, State and local governments and other gov't. agencies that if this stuff doesn't stop you will be buying civilians banned products from China.
Last edited by My Toy; February 17, 2013 at 02:20 PM. Reason: Passionate about topic, sorry about the language it won't happen again |
February 17, 2013, 12:43 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 761
|
__________________
"Our contract called for 16 cases of rifles and ammunition for $10,000 dollars, not a machine gun...........That is our present to the General"-Pike Bishop “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” |
February 17, 2013, 01:04 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
I agree, I have already decided my next firearm purchase(s) will be from one of these manufacturers, I don't care how long the wait is.
i don't really need any more guns, but I will show my support for them with my wallet, which I guess is the only way really. I have already cancelled a planned trip to NY this spring in protest of their new gun restrictions. Fortunately I cancelled with enough notice that I got a 100% refund, guess what I bought with it.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason |
February 17, 2013, 02:07 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Posts: 332
|
govt agencies might just say okay and start buying guns from overseas. The federal govt could tacitly tell China or other nations that we, (the USA) will not support anyone who challenges China for patent infringement or such.
What if the governor or a important legislator from New York or wherever gets frustrated not being able to buy the weapons its state needs and then gets elected to federal office? Might they have a grudge against some big manufacturer that would not sell weapons to his state? And consequently push sales to foreign manufacturers? This tactic could backfire terribly. Or it might work. Last edited by horatioo; February 17, 2013 at 03:15 PM. |
February 17, 2013, 03:38 PM | #5 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Horatioo, certain "government agencies" might try something like that, but I guarantee you, the US Military would not stand for it.
They are the single largest procurer of both firearms and ammo. To place them at the mercy of some other nation and what they thought of how our military is told to perform their job, by the same legislature that restricts their procurement methods... Strategically and tactically, it would be a non-starter. On the other hand, for the BIG manufacturers to stop selling to domestic LE, would affect their bottom line, but only in the short-term. In the longer-term, it would protect both their LE accounts and their civilian accounts (which are much smaller than LE sales, but are a significant portion of their sales, regardless). To that end, we really need to write their boards of directors and CEO's, outlining the effects of such a strategy. Would companies like Glock and Sig follow us? Who knows, if we don't attempt such a campaign. I do know, that if the BIG arms companies aligned themselves with the civilian market, LE would raise a stink the various legislatures would not be able to ignore. |
February 17, 2013, 04:01 PM | #6 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
Many of these big-name mfrs cannot simply stop selling to LEA and the govt. They have large & lucrative contracts with those entities, and that keeps profits high, employees employed, and all the wheels turning. More to the point, those contracts are binding, so these mfrs would have to be willing to get their arses sued off in court. So, combine "we lost a zillion dollars in revenue because we decided not to fulfill our contract to the govt" with "we got sued for another zillion dollars in court because we breached our contracts", and you get "a recipe for corporate bankruptcy". Now if they were all to do this, then suing the entire industry would not be in the government's best interest, because the military and LEAs would have nowhere to go for their weapons and ammo. The resulting fallout would bring the issue to a head. My pie-in-the-sky, optimistic dream is that the reason why those mfrs haven't yet acted is because they're trying to see if they have consensus, and if there's some way they can all act without being thrown in jail by the SEC for violations of their duty to protect their shareholders or something. Corporate execs really hate to go to prison, because they always end up giving the blowjobs, not receiving them, as they are accustomed to. Quote:
|
||
February 17, 2013, 04:20 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
Time for the big name mfgs. to turn up the heat
I fully agree with this strategy. I already have plenty if tactical arms, but will be buying at least two pistols this year specifically from a supporting mfg such as S&W. currently I have all Glocks. And I may buy another AR rifle from a supporting mfg, too this year. But for sure, ALL my future purchases will be ONLY from mfg that take a stand with civilians.
|
February 17, 2013, 04:52 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
This won't happen overnight because there are current contracts to be filled to be sure.
But now that several companies have taken the stance, we can support them and any others that wish to do the same. If it catches on and becomes a strong selling point, then I think there is a real possibility of seeing other manufacturers take the same stance out of self defense.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason |
February 17, 2013, 05:08 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
I don't think politicians are working for longterm benefit of citizens, but more for corporate interess and govt power. Idk and you may be right. |
|
February 17, 2013, 07:05 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 10, 2010
Posts: 720
|
I think it would be a long road to get some of the major manufacturers to go along with not selling to, or providing law enforcement or military.
First, its the advertising that they get from getting their handgun adopted by, and carried by major law enforcement agencies. Glock did this extremely well in the past, which, I feel at least, is why they have a strong following around the country. Its not just the quality of the firearm, but the perception of that quality, in that, "it must be good since it was approved by so many agencies." So I think if this were done, it would basically stifle some newer designs that may come out. Second, once the companies have lost these government contracts, it "can" be difficult for them to effectively compete for them in the future. It would probably narrow the market, in a way which would take a long time to re-open. Lastly, the third is, I feel this will drive a deep dividing wedge between law enforcement and the public. While there are some exceptions in the current laws (and the propossed ones as well) for on-duty exemptions for LE, there is a small segment of the public that would like to either disarm LE or to restrict them to lesser firearms then is available to the general public. While, unfortunatly the administration of some LE agencies are anti-gun, that doesnt mean that the rank-and-file is anti-gun also, and many of the rank-and-file support gun rights for everyone, so I feel its a way to divide firearm owners even more so. To each their own though... |
February 17, 2013, 07:35 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 317
|
Let's turn up the heat on those big-name manufacturers...
You guys probably remember the links from places like Ruger & Firearms Policy Coalition where you can just enter your information, and they will email all your reps for you?
Well, now the good peeps at the Firearms Policy Coalition have made a similar tool, which asks a whole pile of industry-leading companies to stand with us. I hope you'll all take the 10 seconds to add your voice to the chorus. Link: http://www.firearmspolicy.org/take-action/industry/ Here are the companies that will be contacted. If you prefer, the tool will also help you download a text version so you can send mail via the Post Office. Colt Manufacturing Company, LLC P.O. Box 1868 Hartford, CT 06144 Phone: 800-962-2658 Daniel Defense 101 Warfighter Way Black Creek, GA 31308 Phone: 866-554-4867 Fax: 912-851-3248 Smith & Wesson 2100 Roosevelt Avenue Springfield, MA 01104 Phone: 800-331-0852 Fax: 413-747-3317 Walther (see S&W) FN USA PO Box 9424 McLean, VA 22102 Phone: 703-288-3500 Fax: 703-288-4507 Heckler & Koch 5675 Transport Boulevard Columbus, Georgia 31907 USA Phone: (706) 568-1906 Fax: (706) 568-9151 Troy Industries 151 Capital Dr. West Springfield, MA Phone: (413) 788-4288 Remington Arms Company, LLC 870 Remington Drive P.O. Box 700 Madison, NC 27025-0700 Phone: 1-800-243-9700 Fax: 1-336-548-7801 GLOCK, Inc. 6000 Highlands Parkway Smyrna, GA 30082 Phone: 770-432-1202 Fax: 770-433-8719 Beretta U.S.A. Corp 17601 Beretta Drive Accokeek, MD 20607 Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. 200 Ruger Road Prescott, AZ 86301 Phone: 928-541-8892 Fax: 928-541-8835 Aimpoint Inc. 14103 Mariah Court Chantilly VA 20151-2113 Phone: 703 263 9795 Fax: 703 263 9463 L3 Communications 600 Third Avenue New York, NY 10016 Phone: (212) 697-1111 Fax: (212) 805-5477 Hornady Manufacturing Company 3625 West Old Potash Hwy Grand Island, NE 68803 Phone: 1-800-338-3220 Fax: 308-382-5761 Winchester Phone: 800.333.3288 SIG SAUER, Inc. 18 Industrial Drive Exeter, NH 03833 Phone: 603-772-2302 Fax: 603-772-9082 |
February 17, 2013, 10:11 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
Done!
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason |
February 17, 2013, 10:52 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 17, 2006
Posts: 261
|
The gov't contracts may be "big", but they are NOWHERE near the profit of the civilian market.
Glock provides many PDs with pistols at no cost. Where do you think they end up making the money? We have more power than many think, and we need to let the Manf. know it. |
February 17, 2013, 10:53 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2009
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 728
|
I would think that Sig & Glock would just be giddy if the other gun companies exited the LE market in certain states, An over seas company may feel that they really don't have a dog in that fight and prefer to mind their own business,
|
February 18, 2013, 08:42 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: Cowtown of course!
Posts: 1,747
|
Done, I'm in.
__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearms Safety, Pistol and Rifle Instructor “Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life......” President John F. Kennedy |
February 18, 2013, 11:05 PM | #16 | ||
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Here's a list of the companies that won't sell to NYS, or in the alternative will only sell what the common citizen is allowed to own:
Olympic Arms Larue Tactical Templar Custom York Arms Extreme Firepower Cheaper than Dirt West Fork Armory Midway USA Smith Enterprises Exile Machine Charter Arms Spikes Tactical Then there is MagPul s threat of leaving Colorado, should the legislature there pass those mag bans. See this story for the economic impact: Magpul's departure could crack plastics industry, manufacturer says - The Denver Post Is this the start of something good? Read On! Earlier today, quite a few folks who sent Armalite an email, similar to what is being used at http://www.firearmspolicy.org/take-action/industry/ received the following response. Quote:
Armalite's FaceBook page was inundated with angry responses. It finally reached the owner, Mark Westrom. He took down the page and brought it back up with the following: Quote:
|
||
February 18, 2013, 11:34 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 864
|
I hate to gloat... but I and a few others first proposed this idea back on January 19, but it did not seem to get a lot of traction at the time.
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=513144 There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come... well except for perhaps a Cat-5 hurricane... oh and maybe a tsunami... |
February 19, 2013, 12:10 AM | #18 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Count me as one who will never, for the rest of my life, purchase a product from Armalite.
I can choose. I have. Willie . |
February 19, 2013, 12:51 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
Time for the big name mfgs. to turn up the heat
ArmaLite means clueless. I get it now. Thanks for driving home the point Mr Westrom. Your sales guy left the impression Armalite is snotty and whiney. You made it crystal for us.
|
February 19, 2013, 12:15 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 433
|
You just can't win with social media.
This reminds me of that company executive a few months back who filmed himself berating a Chick Fila employee at the drivethru and was fired within 24hrs of the video going viral. There was then backlash against the company for firing a guy for speaking his mind. Then the company issued a statement about "values of the company". Then the guy did some interviews and made himself look like a jackass. Then the gay/lesbian community jumped on the guys case because he wasn't gay. And as far as I know, Chick Fila posted record profits last year. |
February 19, 2013, 12:29 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: Cowtown of course!
Posts: 1,747
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearms Safety, Pistol and Rifle Instructor “Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life......” President John F. Kennedy |
|
February 19, 2013, 12:55 PM | #22 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
arfcom is outraged: ARMALITE'S PRESIDENT'S RESPONSE. - AR15.COM
Quote:
Here's the problem that I see with Mr. Westrom's point #2: above. I also don't want to see the police outgunned or disarmed. However, most legislatures when passing anti-gun legislation, exempt LEO's from the laws. This makes them an elite citizen. Whether their dept. buys their arms or individual LEO's have to purchase their own (budget constraints or just smaller depts), by supplying "forbidden arms" to the police, their bosses have no reason to howl for change to their legislatures. Police Chiefs (political appointees) and those LEO's that are truly anti-gun, need to be pressured. The only way to make these LEO's understand, is for the Manufacturers to supply them with the same equipment that the lowly citizens are allowed to have. All the exemptions, by law, will not help them if the arms they want are (1) not available and/or (2) not warrantied. This goes back to the other thread. They (Arms Manufacturers and the Police) are either with us, or against us. |
|
February 19, 2013, 07:24 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2011
Posts: 181
|
I just used the link in post #11, any chance the OP or a Moderator can place it in its own thread? It would get more mileage.
|
February 19, 2013, 10:23 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2000
Location: AoW Land, USA
Posts: 1,968
|
For NY i would guess that any contracts for items banned by the SAFE act could be deemed null and void as delivery (even to LE) would violate state law. Cancel the contracts and do not send anything to NY agencies ever again.
|
February 20, 2013, 10:28 AM | #25 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
It was locked as a duplicate thread. We are discussing this stuff, right here. Aren't we?
|
|
|