The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 3, 2016, 09:11 PM   #1
Deja vu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
Good long range hunting round?

I am looking for a good cartridge to add to my collection. Currently every thing I have is 45-70Govt, 357 magnum, 12ga or 22lr.

Growing up in the Selway the short range guns where great but as I get older I see the value in a longer range cartridge. I have been hunting antelope with my brother in the deserts in Idaho and long shots are the norm.

What would you recommend? Cost is an issue. I dont want to spend $100.00 on a box of ammo.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull.

all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well...
Deja vu is offline  
Old July 3, 2016, 09:58 PM   #2
Bozz10mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 28, 2013
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 287
I would think either 30.06 or .308 will make a good long range round. And .270 Winchester.
Bozz10mm is offline  
Old July 3, 2016, 10:02 PM   #3
Blindstitch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,685
You're going to get a lot of answers from the 7mm and 30 caliber family. Possibly even a few 6.5's

What's the largest animal you intend to shoot and say the longest range you want to shoot.
Blindstitch is offline  
Old July 3, 2016, 10:16 PM   #4
Deja vu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
Largest animal may be elk but at closer range 100-200 yards But i could take my 45-70 for this.

Longest range would be antelope at 400-500 yards.
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull.

all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well...
Deja vu is offline  
Old July 3, 2016, 10:21 PM   #5
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,298
I consider long range 700 yards and out.

For medium ranges out to about 600 yards on deer and pronghorn, a good 6.5mm with a hunting bullet and and a lot of practice will be fine. If you are going past 600 yards, I think you need more horsepower. The 6.5s will hit past 1K, but they lack the energy for humane kills past 600 to 700 yards depending on bullet and MV.

.260 Rem, 6.5x55, 6.5CM are all excellent medium game medium range cartridges.
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old July 3, 2016, 11:01 PM   #6
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,212
.243 Win if pronghorn is the only game, .270 Win if you want it to handle elk as well with it. That is if a commonly found cartridge is what you're after? If you want something a little different MarkCO offered up some excellent suggestions. .25-06, 7mm-08, and .280 would be good offerings, but don't forget the .308 and .30-06 will work wonderfully at those ranges as well.
__________________
NRA Life Member
taylorce1 is offline  
Old July 3, 2016, 11:32 PM   #7
t45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 29, 2010
Location: Foothills, NC
Posts: 782
7mm mag is a good all around cartridge for varmints to elk....
t45 is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 12:35 AM   #8
Blindstitch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,685
With elk in the possible equation I would go 270, 308 or 30-06. One of the main reasons is unless you reload which I do.. everything but the common cases will cost more.

Here in Wisconsin around deer season and many other times of the year 30-30 and 30-06 are king being available everywhere for a low price from the big box stores to small town gas stations. My 30-40 Krag is now at about $40 a box and barely available.

My future long range gun will most likely be in 308 or 30-06 unless I find a good deal to reload for.
Blindstitch is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 04:18 AM   #9
Bozz10mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 28, 2013
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 287
Another round to consider for antelope size game is the 25-06. It is a very flat shooting round and has plenty punch for medium size animals.
Bozz10mm is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 05:38 AM   #10
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
Many don't consider it but .50 or .338 for 700 yard plus shots (per MarCO's definition) is as good as you will get. Pricey compared to your .22, nothing else has the ballistic coefficient and wind resistance beyond 1/3 of a mile out to a mile.
Fewer rounds per box but most come with excellent muzzle breaks reduce the recoil to much better than a 7mm.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 10:15 AM   #11
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,298
We do shoot Pronghorn with .243 more often than not. For Elk, I like .30-06 and .338-06, and those are the usuals for mule deer too.

You can always get a lighter (and longer with the solids) bullet and download it some if you want, but all cartridges have their ceilings. The only times I have heard people complain about too much gun is 7mm Mag on Pronghorns and .30-378 on whitetails.
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 10:28 AM   #12
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
With the cost and availability of factory loads considered along with game from pronghorn to elk 308, 30-06 or 270 are the only real options. There are plenty of cartridges that will do what you want and good arguments can be made that any of about 2 dozen others might offer some small advantage. But when you look at cost and what is actually on store shelves the advantages just aren't worth it. For a hand loader cost is about the same for any of them.

I think 30-06 offers the most versatility, but recoil is slightly more than the others.

A 308 will have the least recoil and can be had in smaller, more compact rifles if hunting in steep rugged terrain is a concern. It will be somewhat limited to shorter ranges than the others, but is still a viable 400 yard elk round, farther for smaller game.

On paper the 270 shoots flatter and with factory loads probably does. With the best loads it only beats 30-06 with about 2" less drop at 500 yards though. Hardly any real world advantage. With the better bullets it will take any game 30-06 will so I see the 2 as ballistic twins.
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 11:24 AM   #13
Dufus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
Ammo is less than $100 for a 300 RUM. Can't hardly beat it for the long range stuff.
Dufus is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 12:19 PM   #14
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
"...700 yards and out..." Which is way too far for any hunting shot with any cartridge.
"...they lack the energy for humane kills..." So do any of the .27 or .30 calibres. Even the much vaunted 7mm Rem Mag with a 150ish grain bullet only has about 1700ish ft/lbs. of energy remaining at 500. Drops like a brick past 300 too.
However, being able to hit a wee elk's heart/lungs area of about 6" or so diameter at 500 plus is an issue as well. Means you really have to know your rifle and its capabilities.
Average distance for elk in Idaho is about 200 yards with 400 possible.
And there's a great deal of UP. Get fit.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 02:05 PM   #15
Minorcan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2015
Posts: 379
I live in the Southeast so I like the 270 or 30-06 when out west. Both are good long range calibers with enough energy to kill at long range. To be effective you need energy to be delivered. I have used a 375 Remington Ultra Mag but for most cases it is overkill.
Minorcan is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 04:25 PM   #16
ms6852
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,394
With cost being an issue 30-06 would be my choice. I still find a box at Walmart under $20. Plus with the range of bullets for reloading you can literally go hunting squirrels to moose, or is it meese. Whatever the 308 shoots the ought six does it faster.
__________________
ONLY TWO DEFINING FORCES HAVE GIVEN UP THEIR LIVES FOR YOU. ONE IS JESUS CHRIST FOR YOUR SOUL AND THE OTHER IS THE AMERICAN SOLDIER FOR YOUR FREEDOM.
ms6852 is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 06:30 PM   #17
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
My choice is 270 Winchester, but the 30-'06 is just as good. Nothing else is quite in the same class. Price and availability of 308 and 243 makes those two also worthy of consideration for some folks.
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old July 4, 2016, 07:56 PM   #18
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O'Heir
]"...700 yards and out..." Which is way too far for any hunting shot with any cartridge.
"...they lack the energy for humane kills..." So do any of the .27 or .30 calibres. Even the much vaunted 7mm Rem Mag with a 150ish grain bullet only has about 1700ish ft/lbs. of energy remaining at 500. Drops like a brick past 300 too.
However, being able to hit a wee elk's heart/lungs area of about 6" or so diameter at 500 plus is an issue as well. Means you really have to know your rifle and its capabilities.
Average distance for elk in Idaho is about 200 yards with 400 possible.
And there's a great deal of UP. Get fit.
1. 700 yards is a long shot on game, but it isn't way too far for some hunters.
2. There is no energy minimum needed to kill big game, if there was then muzzleloader and handgun hunting would be outlawed.
3. The only thing that "drops like a brick", is a brick!
4. An average sized kill zone for heart and lungs on a white tail is about 10" in diameter, an elk's heart lung area is much larger than 6".
5. The OP lives and hunts in Idaho. I imagine he knows what kind of physical condition he needs to be in, there's no need to tell him to get fit.
__________________
NRA Life Member
taylorce1 is offline  
Old July 5, 2016, 01:09 AM   #19
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
Lets face it, there are many good cartridges/rifle combos, that will do what you wish.

I would look at some ballistic charts, attempt to shoot a couple of different rifles in the calibers your looking at (I have often let someone else take a shot out of my rifles at the range).

All the opinions in the world, and all the ballistic chart comparisons just don't match actually shooting a cartridge.
std7mag is offline  
Old July 5, 2016, 05:12 AM   #20
Sure Shot Mc Gee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
Depends on where you reside. Plains, mountainous, swamps. Personally I think the 270 is the best caliber for my use of all I have available to me. But what works for me may not be appropriate for you. So seriously if I were to single out just one caliber out of all. A big game hunting caliber? >300 Winchester Mag.
Hand loading for it. 300 mag has a overwhelming rainbow of reloading possibilities quite unlike many of the others (including my venerable 270.) But its known the magnum cartridges have one disappointment. Its rifles tend to be heavy in weight which for me is why I prefer another non-magnum caliber.
Sure Shot Mc Gee is offline  
Old July 5, 2016, 05:34 AM   #21
stubbicatt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2007
Posts: 1,707
Since OP says he will be hunting only pronghorn at distance, I'd say either 243 or maybe a 6.5x55.
stubbicatt is offline  
Old July 5, 2016, 05:51 AM   #22
old roper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
Factory ammo I would use 270/30-06 and I do own both. 30-06 you have more choice on bullets if that be a concern.

You can get on Federal site they give you ballistic tables

https://www.federalpremium.com/produ...le.aspx?id=764
__________________
Semper Fi
Vietnam 1965
VFW Life member
NRA Life Member
old roper is offline  
Old July 5, 2016, 03:09 PM   #23
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
Yeah, I kinda thought, that for the purposes of this discussion, we were being asked to recommend calibers that would not only be suited to the purpose, but could also be expected to easily find ammo for at the most reasonable prices. If I got that right, then we are doing a dis-service to recommend some of the calibers that are being mentioned here. It seems to me that the only calibers that meet this criteria are 243 Winchester, 270 Winchester, 308 Winchester, and 30-'06 Springfield. While there are other calibers that will perform just as well as these; they really don't belong in this discussion since they will be but poorly represented on the shelves of most places out in the country, if at all, and when you do see them, they cost half-again more. It doesn't matter if the 6mm Remington. 25-06, 280 Remington, or what have you, is your darling cartridge. Those are not competitively priced on the shelves and are less well represented.
There is a wide selection of plain hunting ammo for 243 Winchester, 270 Winchester, 308 Winchester, and 30-'06 Springfield, and it all is priced about the same. Premium ammo is available as well, but we were talking about budget ammo. If recoil is an issue, and pronghorn is the major focus, then the 243 is the stand-out winner. Otherwise, take your pick between 270 or 30-'06. 308 Winchester would be a modestly respectable option.
It seems unreasonable to look at this much differently....
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old July 5, 2016, 03:53 PM   #24
MarkCO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 1998
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 4,298
Pathfinder45, when was the last time you checked price and availability of .260 Remington or 6.5x55? Price per round and availability are very close. The slightly less number of loadings is due to the slightly smaller usable weights of the .243Win vs. the 6.5mms and the average .260 or 6.5x55 load is 25% heavier than the average .243Win load, with about 15% increase in cost. Certainly not a big deal and less than the .308, .30-06 and .270 hunting loads in the same brand.

I own both, like both and shoot both...those two 6.5mms offer a larger window and heavier weights than the .243 and deliver a little more energy downrange. But they are in no way is less available or poorly represented. When I go to a Bass Pro or Cabelas here in the West, about the same same for each. The 6.5x55 is even a little better than the .260, but both are widely available, economical and effective.

It seems unreasonable to kick those two 6.5ms to the curb along with some of the other calibers.
__________________
Good Shooting, MarkCO
www.CarbonArms.us
MarkCO is offline  
Old July 5, 2016, 04:52 PM   #25
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
MarkCO, I hear you, but my guess is that like me, you probably reload and don't buy much factory ammo. And when you do, it's probably not at some rural feed/tack and hardware store out in the country. I do check prices around every so often, like at BiMart, Sportsman's Warehouse. Fisherman's Marine, and some small town shops for comparison. The best prices I see of some of these up-and-coming calibers that are gaining in popularity sometimes come within ten dollars more per box than basic Winchester or Federal blue-box 270. I never see it match it. Next time I go into Coastal Farm and Ranch store I will see what they have as they are definitely selling ammo. In revolvers, I'm a 45 Colt guy, but I readily will tell others that most of them will be better served with a 44 Magnum. I don't think we should automatically recommend our favorite cartridge to someone else. I do think that some of the 6.5 mm cartridges today are exhibiting some very outstanding qualities in terms of rifle cartridge development. Some are closing in on mainstream acceptance, and the situation is evolving. And, for the avid reloader, even an obscure wildcat is no impediment.

Last edited by Pathfinder45; July 5, 2016 at 06:06 PM. Reason: Spelling
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11066 seconds with 8 queries