April 18, 2013, 08:57 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 549
|
Modern Day Muzzloader
So I was going through Cabela's the other day and besides buying a new fishing rod I looked pretty seriously at the modern day muzzleloading rifles. They look like they would be a good conversation starter at the range and I wouldn't mind seeing if I could take a deer or two with one.
Any advice for a noob?
__________________
BOOM |
April 18, 2013, 09:00 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 19, 2012
Location: Treasure Coast, Florida
Posts: 335
|
Skip them and go traditional.
|
April 18, 2013, 10:02 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Too many choices
What is often refered to as Modern InLines have gone through their own evolution. All of what I see today, are strictly 209 primer ignition. Most are break action and then it varies on features and pricing. All are capable of providing good performance. Other than that, you would have to be more specific on just what you were looking at. Look at TC, Traditions and CVA. ...
Good luck and; Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
April 18, 2013, 10:24 AM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Some sort of quick change plug to make cleaning and such easy.
I am big on stainless steel in genera and for a gun that is likely to see corrosive it is a MUST IMO. I bought a used TC stainless for $150 off craiglist a few years ago. Used muzzleloaders are a great deal. THe only caveat is there aren't a lot of breach plug models on the used market. Conversation starter at the range... Yes, but in my experience the conversation is something like: **Cough, COugh** "Put that **** smoke pole away" repeated as the cloud of smoke floats past every station on the line. |
April 18, 2013, 10:45 PM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,831
|
If you want range and hitting power go with a Minie gun.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
April 21, 2013, 11:30 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
I'll tell you what 88Scrat. You invite us all here on your thread out to Kansas during your M/L deer season and have a rather large farm for us to shoot on.__ (of course!!)__ I'm sure we'll all let you try each one of our rifles. That way you could say you've tried nearly all them brands at least once and preferred so & so's over all.___ And s~ay_@> ___ if we were to do a little hunt'in while there and take a little somethin/somethin to fill our pick-up box with for the ride home. (Let's consider that someth'in/somethin each one of us harvested just a {little perk} for showing up) "How's that sound?"_ Are you game Sir. O~oo I got a couple nice rifles for you to try. Pahoo probably has a dozen or so to bring along since has hasn't all that far to travel like the rest of us do._
|
April 21, 2013, 11:46 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Sounds like a plan.
Quote:
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. Last edited by Pahoo; April 21, 2013 at 01:43 PM. |
|
April 21, 2013, 01:51 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2013
Location: closer than you think
Posts: 967
|
I'd say start old school. There's something about those old flint and cap guns, but I haven't come accosted an inline that wouldn't harvest deer at 100 yrds. I wouldn't worry about those 150g charge guns. The only thing I load over 100g in is my .62 cal with a 900g bullets. .50 cals usually over penetrate on deer with a 80g charge. Sabot rounds are cool but very expensive. If you shoot allot you'll want to shoot and cast your own lead, as it is much cheaper. I hope you get one they're very addictive.
Boomer
__________________
The number one cause of death in the 20th century. 290,000,000 citizens were first disarmed and then murdered by their own governments. This number does not include those killed in war. We're from the government, we're here to help |
April 23, 2013, 12:27 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 549
|
Sureshot, that's the great thing about Kansas; plenty of nothing in every direction, come on down.
Boomer58Cal, I too hope to have one someday, but I think I need to hold off until I know a little more about 'em. Not gonna lie almost made an impulse gun buy. (cause that's never happened before...)
__________________
BOOM |
April 23, 2013, 07:44 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
I'm strictly an in-line kind of shooter. I don't do it for fun - I do it only because that is the legal way to spend more time in the field. If you want to do it for fun (because you kind of like the idea of seeing clouds of smoke, etc.) then by all means get yourself a sidelock and have a ball.
On the other hand, if you are like me and are only looking for a means to extend your regular deer seaons then go for the most modern inline you can afford. |
April 23, 2013, 06:00 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Stuart, VA
Posts: 2,473
|
^^^ +1
If getting meat is the goal, get a good modern inline. I wouldn't worry so much about a quick change breech plug. You won't have a need to remove it quickly. If you want to hunt, then go traditional.
__________________
Liberty and freedom often offends those who understand neither. |
April 23, 2013, 06:45 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Location: to close to other houses
Posts: 1,176
|
This modern day enough?
Bolt and one piece breech plug can be removed in less than 30 seconds with nothing more than a big flat head screwdriver. Modern efficiency, ease of use and more weather proof? 209 primer inline, no particular type, just what suits you. Doyle and Noelf are spot on. If it were me and money were no object (in my case it is ) I'd get a laminated stock, matte stainless TC encore with a BP and .35 REM barrel. For more fun ( to me) get a "traditional" something or other. My love of all things "old timey" and insatiable blood lust of firepower led me to wanting one of these now more than the inline....unless it's raining |
April 23, 2013, 10:04 PM | #13 | |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
But if you want to go that route: http://www.encoreclassifieds.com/forum/ Specialty Pistols Forum You may have to join on those to view them. The specialty Pistols classified is much more active. Almost always a few ML barrels on there. |
|
April 23, 2013, 10:22 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2013
Posts: 439
|
never been much for modern inlines and here they wont get you one more day in the field then any other rifle .
i have built a couple but have not been overly impressed with any of the production ones i have seen or shot i would agree with the others . if your going to do it , go traditonal . while the inline "may cost you less , it will eat a hole in your wallet if you even get remotly serious obout shooting it . to each their own i guess |
April 24, 2013, 07:42 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Berdan - I had one of those. It shot great but that bolt turned me off. It was difficult to get a primer into (especially wearing gloves). After going to a screw-in breech rifle I was much happier (and unfortunately, poorer).
|
April 24, 2013, 07:49 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Location: to close to other houses
Posts: 1,176
|
Doyle:
Your too right sir...that is the draw back to it. getting the primer out is pretty easy with a pick, but you'll never get one in it with gloves on.... especially with the scope That double rifle primes easy though! |
April 24, 2013, 07:52 AM | #17 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,831
|
I'd rather get that Parker Hale EnfieldMusketoon that TroutCreek is selling. Hit out to 300 easily with it (provided you do your bit). The longer Enfield could easily hit at 500.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
April 24, 2013, 10:05 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 3, 2011
Location: to close to other houses
Posts: 1,176
|
I thought it was a euroarms
|
April 24, 2013, 10:19 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 14, 2009
Location: Macon Co. NC
Posts: 591
|
Well, here's the deal.
If you want it strictly for hunting, and really don't care about "getting into" muzzleloaders as a hobby, I'd get one of the short, lightweight in-line carbines. I say short, because in my area, it's mostly brush hunting, and shots rarely are over 75 yards. If, where you are going to be hunting a flat spot, get one of the longer barreled long range in-lines- but they are heavy to carry. If you want to get into muzzleloading and this is going to be your first foray into a hobby you might enjoy, get a good percussion or flint longrifle. It's all in what you want. Give us a bit more information, and we can point you in the correct direction.
__________________
Barney Fife: "Nip it, nip it, nip it!" Andy Griffith:"Oh now Barn'...." |
April 24, 2013, 09:24 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2013
Posts: 439
|
if a person does their part ALL of them will hit much farther then most think.
history proves it right up through today . Even if your shooting off hand . Here is a couple photos for you . The first is an off hand long range shoot which I won with my flintlock "open iron sights " with 5 shots , on target at 325 yards . Now let me say that at this even the target is a man sized target and your not scored for hitting a kill zone . Its just hitting the target which is about the size of a man from waist to shoulders . I have not won that event for ?? 5 years I think . My average is 250 yards consistently . 2 years ago I got knocked out at 225 yards . 6 shooters went to 300 without missing and the final two were at 375 . 2nd place was defined by one of them having 1 miss at 375 . Again all off hand . while you maynot be able to see the target in the phot , its in the treeline across the meadow hopefully these photos will give a better idea of accuracy . Ill let you all count the range of this target which is a 10X10 plate This was shot off hand by myself and another gentleman who was shooting a cap lock. 1 shot each was taken off hand and with iron sights . Just as with the above off hand event . We were shooting Round balls only From the line to target Myself Witness and other shooter Close up of target Now the hit you see in the green is mine 54 Cal . The other hit was actually a miss but LOL , the other shooter claimed he actualy hit a smaller target LOL . If you look closely you will see he cut the tape in the first link of the chain with his 50 cal ball as to long barrel vs short ??? i think thats kinda personal preference. At one time I would have agreed with it . However I have found differently through the years . Here in where I hunt , I can easily find myself in very thick lodge pole or completely over grown ash . I don’t find a long gun to be any different in those situations then a good brush gun Weight wise ??/ it depends on the gun you could be looking at 6-8lbs . But that weight is most times balance so you don’t feel it in the carry like you do a heavy short barreled ½ stock OR a poorly balanced modern bolt action which is muzzle light and thus in a short while you have it slinged over your shoulder . In the end , regardless’ of what you chose . Your only going to be as good with the gun as you are in familiarity of the gun itself . doesnt mater if your target shooting or hunting Last edited by Captchee; April 24, 2013 at 09:31 PM. |
April 25, 2013, 07:06 AM | #21 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,831
|
Captchee -that's impressive for round ball shooting. You should be called jagermeister.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
April 25, 2013, 08:50 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 2, 2013
Posts: 439
|
LOL , no Gary , the fact is that i lose more then i win at these events alot of these folks are far better then i am .
but anyway , the fact remains that all we have to do is look back and read the more credible accounts of the capabilities of these rifles . then step back and ask ourselves ; How did they do that and whats changed thats made it so that suddenly these guns are mere hobbies items . When we actually do that , IMO what we will find is that they are just as capable and reliable as 200 years ago . Whats changed is us |
|
|