|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 28, 2009, 09:53 PM | #51 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
Quote:
I understand that there are always "what ifs" with hunting, but an ethical hunter minimizes the "what ifs" whenever and wherever possible. Shooting at 1000 + meters does not fit this description at all. I heard something one time that sums it up pretty well for me, "A target shooter gets as far away from his target as possible and tries to hit it. A hunter gets as close as possible and tries not to miss." Anyway, the getting close part is what makes hunting fun in the first place. Again, JMHO. Jason
__________________
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." -Amendment II, Constitution of the United States of America |
||
September 29, 2009, 12:14 PM | #52 |
Member
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 35
|
For what it's worth, I'm a deer hunter and an M1A Scout owner and I'm not real anxious to take my M1A deer hunting for the following reasons:
1) It's big and heavy 2) It's not nearly as easily scoped as guns more suited for the task (not all M1A receivers are the same and/or mil spec and many people including me have had challenges using after market bases that bolt onto the side of the receiver) 3) It's friggin LOUD. I made the mistake of taking my ear protection off for ONE shot to see just how loud and I will never make that mistake again. Unless you intend on wearing protection (which most hunters probably don't) you will absolutely cringe at the thought of firing an M1A while hunting Given that my only other 'suitable' rifle is a Marlin 336 in 30-30 I thought the M1A in .308 might also double as a more powerful deer rifle, but for the hunting we do here in VT, I can't imagine any scenario that I'd take my M1A over my Marlin 30-30 (unless of course it's post-SHTF and I have to shoot 19 zombies first before using my last shot on a deer lol). Boneman |
September 29, 2009, 12:17 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2009
Location: Dallas / Fort Worth Area
Posts: 678
|
+1 boneman_66
__________________
Don Davis |
September 29, 2009, 12:49 PM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
I wouldn't hesitate to take an M-1A hunting if that's what I had in the closet and I was hunting at reasonable ranges. The only caveat is whether you as the hunter are comfortable and skilled with iron sights - but if you are, the rifle will certainly do its part at any reasonable hunting range.
|
November 25, 2012, 01:02 AM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Posts: 164
|
http://www.springfield-armory.com/armory.php?version=41
the above link says a comp stock standard m1 weighs 8.8 lbs true??? this link http://www.remington.com/products/fi...l-700-vtr.aspx says a rem 700 vtr 308 weighs 7.5 lbs....true?? i guess both are with out optics but that doesnt seem like much weigh difference to me. so if you want a rifle in 308 that can fire quick repeted shots and kill deer as well the comp stock m1 seems a good choice....one rifle handling both roles well, iow. i have been within feet of deer and several yards of elk...i doubt 1000 yards is necessary |
November 25, 2012, 09:51 AM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
This is really an old post.
Wonder how the OP did with his hunting with the M1A. Mine is certainly accurate enough but its too dern heavy.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
November 25, 2012, 02:01 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 1,840
|
It is a zombie thread.
__________________
"A Liberal is someone who doesn't care what you do, as long as it's mandatory". - Charles Krauthammer |
|
|