July 30, 2015, 06:26 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Location: sydney
Posts: 135
|
NYC gun laws
Just saw the below on the ever reliable wikipedia under what's considered an assault weapon.
Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and one or more of the following: Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor Barrel shroud that can be used as a handhold Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm. A folding, telescoping or thumbhole stock[20] Does that mean that a lot of issf pistols are now illegal there? or do they have an exemption for specialist target pistols like we do here? |
July 30, 2015, 11:22 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
I don't know about NY, but I would assume they are illegal. In CA, they are. There was a case of a young lady (16 IIRC), who was an Olympic competitor. She tried to get a variance for her match pistol (banned because the magazine doesn't go in the pistol grip).
Essentially, the state told her, we don't care, go practice in another state. I expect NY would have the same attitude. The definition comes from the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) law, originally, and NY, CA, and some other states passed state laws at that time using the same definitions. The Fed law had a sunset clause, (it went away in 2004), the state laws did not, and are still in force, and (particularly in NY's case) have been expanded, with additional things added to them (NY SAFE Act, etc.) REASON does not matter. REALITY does not matter. If it meets the definition they put in law, it is restricted / prohibited. It's the LAW.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
July 30, 2015, 08:37 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: January 27, 2015
Posts: 54
|
Actually, the California Assault Weapons ban preceded the federal ban of 1994, and was likely the model for the Federal ban, and maybe some of the AW bans subsequently passed in other states. California's Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Ban was passed in 1989, and was signed by Governor Deukmejian, a Republican. If memory serves me correct, it was an earlier schoolyard shooting in Stockton, CA, by a nut with a semi auto AK47, in which several children were killed, that served as the final push for successful passage of this bill and its signing by a Republican Governor. Up until that time, California had not been particularly unfriendly to gun owners, but it seems like that year was the beginning of the numerous anti gun laws California has seen since.
|
July 30, 2015, 10:39 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
Quote:
|
|
July 31, 2015, 12:35 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Location: sydney
Posts: 135
|
Wow. That's more messed up than some of our laws.
ps. I had a look at the california one. It says that olympic pistols are exempted from being considered an assault weapon. |
July 31, 2015, 10:34 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Posts: 17
|
Dragline- I believe that's only true for handguns for NYS, but all guns for NYC
|
July 31, 2015, 10:44 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 1,970
|
CA & NY
I'm moving from NJ to PA where I can have a lot more freedom and still work in NJ
__________________
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". --Thomas Jefferson |
July 31, 2015, 07:27 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
Quote:
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
|
July 31, 2015, 10:05 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
"Simply FALSE." No, half false, half true. Handguns must be in FOPA condition. Long guns sans "assault rifles" can be brought in. But nothing into NYC.
__________________
Jim Page Cogito, ergo armatum sum |
August 1, 2015, 09:28 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 2014
Posts: 6,446
|
The statement I was referring to was the one above where it was mentioning not being able to bring a "GUN" into NYS, no mention of the city. That is simply BS.
__________________
"I believe that people have a right to decide their own destinies; people own themselves. I also believe that, in a democracy, government exists because (and only so long as) individual citizens give it a 'temporary license to exist'—in exchange for a promise that it will behave itself. In a democracy, you own the government—it doesn't own you."- Frank Zappa |
August 1, 2015, 11:11 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2013
Posts: 167
|
Quote:
David |
|
August 1, 2015, 11:12 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,716
|
Quote:
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth. |
|
August 2, 2015, 09:52 AM | #13 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
|
|
August 2, 2015, 09:52 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2008
Posts: 318
|
California, and CT have exemptions for olympic style handguns with the magazine outside of the grip. But they have different peculiarities as to which ones qualify, and how they have to be recognized by the state. I don't know if NY and MA have similar exemptions, but the CT exemption is based on the California exemption.
I'm in CT and I want a Ruger Charger. I wonder if I could buy one to train for the olympics with it. |
|
|