|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 4, 2007, 10:48 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,944
|
pursuing robbery suspects
From:http://www.palmbeachpost.com/local_n...cxntlid=inform
Quote:
Something to think about before chasing after, or shooting at, someone who stole something. P.S. slimy lawyers make me :barf:. |
|
December 4, 2007, 11:10 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I agree about lawyers, but there is a point here. Defending yourself and your family from an immediate threat or protecting your property from an intruder is one thing, chasing crooks is another. There is no way anyone can warp the "castle doctrine" or "self defense" to cover this situation. Even if no gun were involved, the potential for a car crash is so great that I can't see the justification.
Sure, it goes against the grain to say that he should have left the BG's escape and called the cops, but what happened, and what nearly happened, simply is not justified by any "need" to apprehend the crooks, which is not the store owner's duty. The store owner would have been insured, so his loss would have been recovered. The loss of a life can't be. Jim |
December 4, 2007, 11:50 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: in a very anti-gun state :(
Posts: 565
|
Store owner shoulda shot the robbers dead right in the store....
then there would be no need for a chase... |
December 5, 2007, 12:06 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 11, 2007
Location: all over Virginia
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
|
|
December 5, 2007, 07:16 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 23, 2005
Posts: 955
|
we are not cops so dont act like them!! Our job is not to persue but to defend from an imediate threat!
__________________
Colt King Cobra .357 Colt Anaconda .44mag Springfield Armory .45 Double stack Loaded XD40 service XD45 Taurus 617 .357mag Smith M&P 40 |
December 5, 2007, 08:34 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Posts: 296
|
When you were a kid and someone decided to steal your bicycle, would you chase him? Sure you would unless you were a big fat wimp.
If anyone steals from me and runs, I'll be in pursuit and shooting if necessary. There comes a time when we all have to stand up for what is right. To hell with the courts and doctrine. "Thou shalt not steal"! |
December 5, 2007, 09:12 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 16, 2007
Location: Gardendale, Alabama
Posts: 665
|
Criminals shoot at me and hit someone else and I'm responsible because I'm chasing them after they have stolen from me? That's bull. Total and complete. Is chasing after them the best idea? I don't think so, but I don't think it is unjustified either.
I understand the defendants' lawyers position, but you cannnot justify a criminal act because someone is after you for committing another criminal act. IMO, the lawyer would be blaming police if they had been in pursuit. It's the old childhood "you made me do it, so it's not my fault" defense. It doesn't make much sense when put under even a little scrutiny, but it might represent mitigating circumstances that mean life with out parole instead of death (assuming Florida has mandatory capitol murder charges filed when the death occured during the commission of a felony).
__________________
"What is play to the fool and the idiot is deadly serious to the man with the gun." Walt Rauch,Combat Handguns, May '08 |
December 5, 2007, 09:23 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 16, 2007
Location: Gardendale, Alabama
Posts: 665
|
Quote:
__________________
"What is play to the fool and the idiot is deadly serious to the man with the gun." Walt Rauch,Combat Handguns, May '08 |
|
December 5, 2007, 09:45 AM | #9 |
Registration in progress
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 107
|
I think Koh should be charged with reckless injury and death. He put a lot of people into risk in the community and it was absolutly unnecessary. If he did not stop the robery in his own store he cannot turn the streets and the community to the wild west.
Safety first!!! If anyone in my family would loose his life because of an idiot like him I would be very pissed. Certainly would file civil lawsuit for damages. |
December 5, 2007, 10:22 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 298
|
While I am new to this site, I have a question/comment about this thread. I would agree that chasing the suspects was very poor decision by the victim however; if I or any of my family was injured by this chase, I would be seeking criminal and civil actions against the instigators...the suspected robbers.
|
December 5, 2007, 10:22 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 810
|
Quote:
Spare me the "unnecessary risk" BS. You take a risk every time you get in your car or step outside the door. Criminals ENHANCE THAT RISK to us but you're whining about a business OWNER and not the p.o.s. CRIMINALS that precipitated the whole damn event. Oh, that's right. If we'll all become sheep and simply hand over anything and everything a criminal demands, life will be good and nobody will be hurt. I think the business-owner exercised bad judgement taking the chase as far as he did. But I also think a whole lot of Americans are sick and damned tired of all the excuses that sheeple make for not doing a damned thing about it. Blame the freaking criminals. They're the start, root and origin of the problem. Sheesh. Jeff
__________________
If every single gun owner belonged to the NRA as well as their respective state rifle/gun association, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in today. So to those of you who are members of neither, thanks for nothing. |
|
December 5, 2007, 11:05 AM | #12 | ||
Registration in progress
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 107
|
Unfortunately I cannot 100% agree with my fellow Texan.
Quote:
The business owner escaleted the risk level to an unacceptable level (to me) for innocent bystanders. Lets assume you go to SeaWorld and somebody takes your wallet out of your pocket. You start chasing him and he stops and pulls out a gun and tells you let him go. 1. If you keep chasing the guy he might start shooting and hits you and a couple of kids waiting for the dolphin show. 2. You pull out your gun (not sure if SeaWorld is an "ammusement park" and you can legally take your gun) and get into a gun fight risking that even more kids get hurt or killed. 3. Stop chasing the guy. This is a bit extreme but my choice would be definitely opt. 3. The owner should have justified his act and give it up and not trying to recover the stolen money at all cost and turn it into a tragedy and lossing innocent live(s). Quote:
Not sure if you follow Houston news but couple of months ago HPD changed its car chase policy after several innocent people died in accidents caused by evading criminals. In this case I guess even HPD would have stopped the pursuit. I did not want to piss you off by the way just exposed my opinion. I am 110% anti criminal agreeing that criminals should have no rights at all and would 100% agree the business owner if he simply "executed" the "suspects" on the spot. |
||
December 5, 2007, 11:23 AM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Posts: 296
|
Some of the thinking on this board makes me understand why our country is in the shape it is in. We have more criminals in jail than any other country in the world yet we are the greatest with the most opportunity.
Once police give up chasing criminals in vehicular pursuits, no one is going to stop. Why should they? |
December 5, 2007, 11:35 AM | #14 |
Registration in progress
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 107
|
Because once a suspect gets into a suburb living community where kids play on the streets and sidewalks a 100 miles per hour carchase is a definite danger to innocent bystanders. There are other ways to capture the suspect; following from air, capturing license plate and track him down etc.
I am not sure what would you say if a 18 years old would run over your 3 kids playing in front of your house because he had a bag of pot in his pocket and running from the police. Or slam into the minivan your wife is driving with the 3 young kids on the back seat tip them over and killing all four of them. Would you say: Good job? I doubt any reasonable human being would do. |
December 5, 2007, 12:23 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
The shop owner was foolish to chase them. Is he legally cupable in the innocents' death and injury - not a lawyer here so I don't know.
I just think he was an idiot as his action went beyond risking his own life to spread the risks to others. His sense of personal violation and loss is not sufficient to engage in behavior that can put innocents in the line of fire. I don't know if he should go to jail (have to think about that) but if he is a decent and thinking person, his psychological health will be at serious risk now.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
December 5, 2007, 12:30 PM | #16 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
hup, that settles that. One horror story / scenario with the children in it can't be argued against. Nice, playing that for the children card. If the suspect in your scenario killed your kids then the police would not be held responsible, for they were ...in the course of their duties blah blah blah.
It wasn't the store owners bullets that killed the guy. He didn't initiate the course of events leading up to the incident, and shouldn't be held responsible. Yes, it's a tragedy what happened. What would you have us to do, Mr. Champion of the children, lay down and die? Not resist any crime? My god man, there's children everywhere. If we never resist because there might be a child around...soon thugs will be taking their kids to work with them. |
December 5, 2007, 12:43 PM | #17 |
Registration in progress
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 107
|
Hehe! Good idea. I'll take a few kids with me to my next bank robbery.
|
December 5, 2007, 01:04 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
What are you talking about, folks?
Resistance isn't a car chase that risks others. It's very simple to understand.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
December 5, 2007, 01:25 PM | #19 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: Steubenville, OH
Posts: 4,446
|
Quote:
People say that domestics and traffic stops are the most dangerous things a cop can do. Baloney, and I say that from experience. It's vehicle pursuits. They're terrifying and they're dangerous. I've been in a lot of 'em over the last 25 years, and the most serious injury I've ever sustained in this business was the result of a vehicle pursuit gone bad. I was off work for four months and in substantial pain for years afterward. Lots of cops get hurt or killed during pursuits, and they have the benefit of extensive training in offensive/defensive high speed driving, skid pan, PIT maneuvers, etc. Do you think the average motorist can do better? This guy had every right to be angry, but when he put others at risk to satisfy his own rage, he stepped over the line.
__________________
TFL Members are ambassadors to the world for firearm owners. What kind of ambassador does your post make you? I train in earnest, to do the things that I pray in earnest, I'll never have to do. --Capt. Charlie |
|
December 5, 2007, 01:33 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Normal, IL
Posts: 60
|
That's just BS--it's unfortunate someone got killed, but what's the root cause of it? The storeowner chasing? I think not. He chased after being threatened. The BG's pulled the trigger. He wouldn't have chased had they not robbed him in the first place. Unintended consequence-people will think twice about robbing his store again, or any other that has an owner that may be like him.
Just hand over the money if the BG's have a gun? Then what? Hope they don't kill you on the spot? May as well put a sign on the door that says "I won't resist". It's hard to tell ethnicity from the name, but he's more than likely asian. When I was in the LA Riots in '92 (I was with one of the two Marine Battalions sent up there), the Korean store owners were the only ones that didn't need our help. They were patrolling the areas around thier homes and businesses, and had OP's (for lack of a better term) on the roofs of their stores. They were almost as well armed as we were. End result: they didn't get messed with in the chaos that was erupting all around them. I felt very safe in their area of influence. Scott MSgt USMC |
December 5, 2007, 01:41 PM | #21 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Yeah, I know Glenn. I'm just sick of hearing don't resist criminals, give em what they want, stand down. It might overpenetrate, miss, be a drunk neighbor, or a girl scout. Then the law goes after the real victim. Wronged by the law? Offer no resistance, let em have thier way, go and beg mercy from the court. And it's always for the children...:barf:
We citizens are stuck between a rock n a hard place with LEO's and thugs. When we do nothing, we lose on both fronts. It's not right. The worst thing is that some of us citizens buy into it and espouse standing down as a proper thing to do. Maybe the guy went too far and maybe he didn't. |
December 5, 2007, 02:39 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Excuse me - the issue was not resistance. Why do folks keep banging this drum?
The issue was engaging in a high speed chase that had the probability of harming innocents. One has to look at the totality of possible outcomes. As Capt. C said, a civilian chasing armed criminals puts others at significant risk. Risk you own butt but not everyone else on the highway. I have no problem with resisting but being stupid is another thing.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
December 5, 2007, 04:14 PM | #23 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
Guy robs ya, leaves you alive, so you chase him and he shoots at ya and kills others. Hmmmmm I see it as both have a little fault here, not all but some. He is lucky he didnt get shot. Quote:
|
||
December 5, 2007, 05:26 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 997
|
This is a pretty tough one...if the guy hadn't pursued them, the robbers would have likely not been shooting while making their getaway right? To a reasonable person that's a fair statement right?
So did his actions result in escalating the situation and exposing himself, the robbers, and others to injury and death? I think a reasonable answer is yes. I don't care what happened beforehand, his act of chasing led to death. It should be reckless endangerment or something similar, he did what he did with no malice or pre-meditation but we are all held to be responsible for our actions. The other guys get charged with murder during the commission of a robber...maybe a capital crime depending on how much was stolen. Chasing and resisting/self defense are not in the same category. For all the good he did a description of the car and a license plate number would have been far better. Should he have been armed and stopped the robbery in progress? I would if I owned a business dealing with cash...I'd like to think I would anyway. I've said several times already...I'm really afraid that if I am ever in a situation where I have to use my handgun for self-defense I am more afraid of some of our resident cowboys than the BG's...I hope I am never around when one of them is chasing a mugger or robber through a crowded area while shooting a 1911 in one hand, a S&W J-Frame in the other, with at least one polymer subcompact in a SOB holster ready for use next. |
December 5, 2007, 06:35 PM | #25 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Posts: 296
|
I've been in pursuits. Have you seen the Cop shows showing pursuits? They are all hairy! None of them are safe and they all put lives in danger. The street is a rough place.
There is no such thing as a safe pursuit. There will always be a kid somewhere during it or people on the sidewalk. Police can back off when an air unit is available but sooner or later you have to close in and take the suspect down. No fare saying the guy just might have a roach in his pocket or be driving without a license because he just as well might have kidnapped your daughter. I say chase down the bad guys and be relentless. I'll chance the colateral damage in order to get them off the street. |
|
|