The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 22, 2009, 04:25 AM   #26
olmontanaboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2009
Location: Northeast for now
Posts: 266
Quote:
When they DO make something fool proof, we'll just grow some smarter fools.
Amen brother.
__________________
Olmontanaboy
No good deed goes unpunished.
A loaded gun, a faithful dog,,, consider yourself lucky.
olmontanaboy is offline  
Old November 30, 2009, 07:05 PM   #27
tpelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Posts: 120
I have an older Pietta 1860 Army - a late-1980's manufacturing code. Hadn't shot it for years until about a month ago, when I became interested in cap & ball revolvers again. I read about "short arbor syndrome" and tested my Pietta, and sure enough it WAS too short.

My solution was to find a couple of thin washers - actually washers for 1/8" pop-rivets were just about perfect in diameter. I ended up stoning the two washers to get them to just the right thickness (one by itself was too thin, but two together were too thick), then used blue Loc-Tite to "glue" 'em into the bottom of the arbor hole in the barrel.

Fit is perfect now.

Maybe today Pietta fits the arbor correctly, but not back when my old revolver was made.

I understand that the deal was that, back in the day when Colt was making these revolvers, they made all of their arbors too long, and during the barrel fitting process the gunsmith would file the end off of the arbor and keep test fitting and filing until he got it perfect - you can always cut more off, but you can't ever cut more on, so to speak. Pietta (and Uberti) made all of their arbors purposely too short so that any barrel could mate with any arbor/frame.

I understand that Pietta invested in some new, modern CNC machining centers fairly recently. That's probably why the new Piettas have a reputation for their arbors being right - their manufacturing tolerances are so much better with the new machinery.
tpelle is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 10:40 PM   #28
AdmiralB
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 88
Quote:
My solution was to find a couple of thin washers - actually washers for 1/8" pop-rivets were just about perfect in diameter. I ended up stoning the two washers to get them to just the right thickness (one by itself was too thin, but two together were too thick), then used blue Loc-Tite to "glue" 'em into the bottom of the arbor hole in the barrel.
That's interesting; traditional Loc-Tite wouldn't have been my first choice since it's not really primarily an adhesive.

Having said that, I've done a similar thing. Of my seven Ubertis, only two had arbor-to-barrel fit issues (and they are both 1851 variants, go figure).

I used a shim washer and an internally-toothed lock washer, which I flattened gradually in a vise until it was the proper thickness...then I JB-Welded them to the end of the arbor. So far, so good. And the wedges fit a lot better now.
AdmiralB is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 09:33 AM   #29
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralB
That's interesting; traditional Loc-Tite wouldn't have been my first choice since it's not really primarily an adhesive.
Actually it is a high temp adhesive available in different strengths, just not marketed as that. If you need a gap filling adhesive you can use the loc-tite 'stud and bearing mount' Several years ago I attended a two day seminar put on by loc-tite about product application.

Here's a method of using JB on the end of the arbor. I think Devcon would be a better choice for this as it is stronger that JB in my experience. This diagram was copied from another forum, I think it originated with articap. I want to try this once and see how well it holds up in actual uses. It may be a good method if you are working with a very thin layer.

madcratebuilder is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 10:06 AM   #30
Noz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2009
Posts: 643
DEVCON vs JB Weld.

Tried using Devcon to replace JB in the hammers of Colt style revolvers. No comparison. Devcon did not last a single firing. JB will go several shoots.
Noz is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 11:51 AM   #31
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
This diagram was copied from another forum, I think it originated with articap.
I've never seen that diagram before in my life!

Last edited by arcticap; December 4, 2009 at 12:10 PM.
arcticap is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 02:01 PM   #32
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noz
DEVCON vs JB Weld.

Tried using Devcon to replace JB in the hammers of Colt style revolvers. No comparison. Devcon did not last a single firing. JB will go several shoots.
That's strange. I've been using Devcon for thirty years. Repaired cast iron engine blocks and cylinder heads. I have machined it on mills, turned it on lathes and tapped it for threaded fasteners. Always has worked well for me with in it's limitations. Devcon comes in several formulas, steel, titanium, aluminum, stainless steel to name a few. Maybe you used the small tube stuff, that's it's not the good Devcon, it shears at 1600psi, the good stuff shears at 3200psi. It does have it's limitations, heat over 350* or so kills it, adheres much better to a textured surface vs a smooth surface.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06410 seconds with 11 queries