The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 14, 2008, 03:36 PM   #1
Brad Clodfelter
Registration in progress
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Posts: 925
Kansas Bruiser Buck

All I have is this buck was supposedly killed near Baldwin this month.

Brad Clodfelter is offline  
Old December 18, 2008, 03:37 PM   #2
Brad Clodfelter
Registration in progress
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Posts: 925
Here's a better picture.

This deer is going to score real well even as a typical.

Brad Clodfelter is offline  
Old December 18, 2008, 03:38 PM   #3
Dr. A
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2007
Location: Salina, KS.
Posts: 215
HOLY smokes!
Dr. A is offline  
Old December 18, 2008, 03:44 PM   #4
freakintoguns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 6, 2008
Posts: 496
daaaaaamn
freakintoguns is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 12:34 AM   #5
Brad Clodfelter
Registration in progress
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Posts: 925
I think this deer green scores 250. I'm guessing it might have a shot at breaking the Hanson buck world record typical if it is legit. Even after deductions and the abnormal drop points, it is going to score very well net typical as a main frame 12pt.
Brad Clodfelter is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 12:44 AM   #6
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
Nothin a little newspaper, corn starch and photoshop can't do...
Seriously what a strange way to grow antlers...
Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 01:18 AM   #7
Brad Clodfelter
Registration in progress
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Posts: 925
You might not want to bark before you bite.

http://www.awesomeantlers.com/showphoto.php?photo=21801
Brad Clodfelter is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 01:39 AM   #8
onthejon55
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 411
thats the kind of deer i would total my truck for
onthejon55 is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 02:05 AM   #9
HOGGHEAD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2008
Location: Rivesville, WV
Posts: 637
No Way

I ain't buying it. I may be wrong. Those horns are over ten inches wider than that fellow at the shoulders?? My bet is on a cropped picture. Tom.
HOGGHEAD is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 02:17 AM   #10
Brad Clodfelter
Registration in progress
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Posts: 925
Time will tell I guess. You may be right. But we will know more soon.

http://www.boone-crockett.org/news/t....asp?area=news
Brad Clodfelter is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 10:42 AM   #11
Dr. A
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 17, 2007
Location: Salina, KS.
Posts: 215
A little more realistic view. My brother has a friend of a friend. I do believe that one shot was either a enhanced version, or a strange angle.



I see a split brow tine on this one that is not on the other. The brow tine looks a little more like one of the other antlers.

Last edited by Dr. A; December 19, 2008 at 10:52 AM.
Dr. A is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 05:09 PM   #12
Brad Clodfelter
Registration in progress
 
Join Date: January 26, 2007
Posts: 925
Dr. A.,

Thanks for the picture. I would like to see another head on. It definately looks smaller than the other, no doubt, but it's still looks to be a very huge rack. If you hear anymore, let us know.
Brad Clodfelter is offline  
Old December 19, 2008, 05:40 PM   #13
globemaster3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 28, 2006
Posts: 1,482
If you look at the original picture, look at the size of the guy's fingers. He's using the same photo technique you see in a lot of fishing photos: hold the fish as far away as you can to make it look bigger. That's why the horns appear to extend 10" either side of the guy.

If he really had hands that big, I would pray he's not a proctologist!

All that being said, that is still an incredible rack. Double drop tines on both sides almost symetrically! Very rare.
globemaster3 is offline  
Old December 20, 2008, 12:22 AM   #14
LateNightFlight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 2007
Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 552
Quote:
I ain't buying it. I may be wrong. Those horns are over ten inches wider than that fellow at the shoulders?? My bet is on a cropped picture.
I was thinking the same thing. A pro photog once explained to me how to shoot pics that make the game look huge. You have the animal as forward as possible in front of the hunter and shoot with a fisheye lens, leaving plenty of space around the top, bottom and sides of the subject. The reason you don't fill the lens with the subject is because you're going to crop out the outer areas of the shot where there will be distortion from the fisheye. The effect is awesome.

Out of curiosity, I copied this photo and pasted it into a cheapie photo application to see if it had something other than a standard aspect ratio that would hint at cropping. It measures 610X458, but if you bump it up to 105%, it's 640X480 - a standard aspect ratio. My guess: Authentic.

Wow! Nice buck!
LateNightFlight is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06426 seconds with 8 queries