super eagle vs M2

wacki · July 11, 2006, 07:25 AM

Does the split receiver on the super eagle have any disadvantages? Theoretically speaking, I would think it could cause some problems with reliability.

wacki · July 11, 2006, 12:06 PM

Also, comparing costs:

Benelli M2 Field (12 Gauge, 21", 3") - ComforTech Stock, Matte Synthetic Finish
Stock # [BN11026] $1,039.00
http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/prod...742a76f360e816

Benelli Super Black Eagle II w/ ComforTech (12 Gauge, 24", 3 1/2") - Matte Synthetic Finish
Stock # [BN10026] $1,339.00
http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/prod...742a76f360e816

I'm not sure I can see a good reason to spend $300 more for what my be an inferior product that is merely easier to clean. Feel free to correct me.

Kestrel · July 15, 2006, 10:11 PM

I've never heard of problems inherent to the two-piece receivers. The decision between the two, is more a matter of chambers. If you need 3.5", go with the SBE. If not, the M2. (If you're getting a Benelli.)

BLKLABMAN · July 16, 2006, 02:42 PM

How you feel the split receiver is inferior???

On Benelli's
I have hunted with my SBE I (H&K model) going on 10 years now. It has been on countless hunts here, in other states, as well as Alberta, and Manitoba.
It has been nothing but reliable in all kinds of conditions from 100 degree heat to below zero goose hunts.
The SBEII I bought two years ago, and the Cordoba I bought at the same time, are just as reliable.
The M2 and M1 20ga my wifes shoots, have been reliable as well.

The SBEI/II can fire 2 3/4. 3" and 3.5" shells, and have split receivers which makes cleaning a snap.
The M1/M2 can fire 2 3/4 and 3" shells, and have a solid receiver.

It depends on what the owner wants.
Neither design is in any shape, form, or fashion, inferior.

July 11, 2006, 07:25 AM	#1
wacki Senior Member Join Date: December 19, 2004 Location: Moving out of Indiana Posts: 426	super eagle vs M2 Does the split receiver on the super eagle have any disadvantages? Theoretically speaking, I would think it could cause some problems with reliability.

July 15, 2006, 10:11 PM	#3
Kestrel Senior Member Join Date: October 28, 2001 Posts: 363	I've never heard of problems inherent to the two-piece receivers. The decision between the two, is more a matter of chambers. If you need 3.5", go with the SBE. If not, the M2. (If you're getting a Benelli.) Last edited by Kestrel; July 17, 2006 at 11:29 AM.

July 16, 2006, 02:42 PM	#4
BLKLABMAN Senior Member Join Date: January 9, 2005 Location: Georgia Posts: 230	How you feel the split receiver is inferior??? On Benelli's I have hunted with my SBE I (H&K model) going on 10 years now. It has been on countless hunts here, in other states, as well as Alberta, and Manitoba. It has been nothing but reliable in all kinds of conditions from 100 degree heat to below zero goose hunts. The SBEII I bought two years ago, and the Cordoba I bought at the same time, are just as reliable. The M2 and M1 20ga my wifes shoots, have been reliable as well. The SBEI/II can fire 2 3/4. 3" and 3.5" shells, and have split receivers which makes cleaning a snap. The M1/M2 can fire 2 3/4 and 3" shells, and have a solid receiver. It depends on what the owner wants. Neither design is in any shape, form, or fashion, inferior. __________________ 10mm Fringe

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

July 11, 2006, 12:06 PM	#2
wacki Senior Member Join Date: December 19, 2004 Location: Moving out of Indiana Posts: 426	Also, comparing costs: Benelli M2 Field (12 Gauge, 21", 3") - ComforTech Stock, Matte Synthetic Finish Stock # [BN11026] $1,039.00 http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/prod...742a76f360e816 Benelli Super Black Eagle II w/ ComforTech (12 Gauge, 24", 3 1/2") - Matte Synthetic Finish Stock # [BN10026] $1,339.00 http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/prod...742a76f360e816 I'm not sure I can see a good reason to spend $300 more for what my be an inferior product that is merely easier to clean. Feel free to correct me.