|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 20, 2011, 05:33 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2011
Location: washington state
Posts: 13
|
supressors and washington state
let me first say, it is my understanding that in washington state (through several legal hoops)it is legal to own a supressor, but it is illegal to use it.
my question is, can anybody tell me why? why is it that my state thinks that this is any sort of good idea? is there some aspect that i just dont see? it seems that it would have been easy to make the law either "supressors are illegal you cannot own them" or "legal to own, legal to use (with all the right paperwork of course)" but instead they come up with this in between idea that is just pointless. let me just put it out there that i dont have a need for, nor do i intend to buy a supressor. i just find the topic really intriguing. |
March 20, 2011, 08:08 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,399
|
I can't speak for Washington State specifically. However silencers were put into the NFA at the request of the Department of Natural Resources in order to minimize poaching. Originally, the National Firearms Registry as proposed was for all concealable weapons, which included handguns. In the 11th hour, handguns were removed from the registry status, and silencers were added. It seems to me that the law in Washington State is just poorly written, and puts a blanket "NO USE" instead of a "legal use" kind of language in the law. (Again, just an un-educated guess.)
Quote:
|
|
March 20, 2011, 08:30 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2011
Location: washington state
Posts: 13
|
well thank you for your "uneducated guess" its more than ive managed to come up with on my own.
|
March 20, 2011, 10:03 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2008
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 462
|
Correct....
For Washington State... you can own (with proper papers) but you can't shoot it.
As to why? Just how WA law dictates... hopefully for now. There is a bill in the state capitol that may fix this... You might want to check the new WA state firearm forum... http://www.waguns.org/ Starts up Monday, March 21, 2011. It has a section that covers suppressors, laws, history and basic information, etc
__________________
"Shoot Safetly, Shoot Often and Share Your Sport." Jim Scoutten, Shooting USA Check out my new website: www.shootonthemove.org |
March 20, 2011, 10:34 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2011
Location: washington state
Posts: 13
|
ah, another useful forum. thank you
|
March 21, 2011, 01:29 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2005
Location: Olympia, Wa.
Posts: 535
|
From what I learned at 1 Senate and 1 House hearing, the wa law stems from a 1934 poaching law. Hopefully that will chage some time in the next few weeks. The House bill (H1016) passed 88 to 4. It is now in the Senate for a second read with a "Do Pass" attached to it.
__________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce Drunk Driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars" Walk softly and carry a big SIG. |
March 21, 2011, 09:58 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 421
|
Looks like the emails paid off. Now on to SBRs.
__________________
Mal-"Jayne, how many weapons you plan on takin', you only got the two arms." Jayne-"Well I just get excitable as to choice-like to keep my options open." |
April 4, 2011, 12:51 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2009
Location: Washington Coast
Posts: 127
|
This is awesome news, it passed unanimously in the senate and is now going before the governor! There's a lot of Washington specific NFA talk over at http://www.waguns.org/viewforum.php?f=41
|
April 4, 2011, 02:33 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 344
|
Second that motion Rimfirechris
|
April 4, 2011, 09:03 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2005
Location: Olympia, Wa.
Posts: 535
|
While I am behind the SBR/SBS passing next I would expect 1 hell of a fight on this and also don't expect the backing of the Police and Sherfff's on this one like we had on the suppressor bill.
__________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce Drunk Driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars" Walk softly and carry a big SIG. |
April 7, 2011, 10:31 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: December 26, 2008
Location: Bonney Lake, WA
Posts: 77
|
It has passed and is setting on the Governors desk for signature.
|
April 12, 2011, 12:30 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 20, 2008
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 447
|
The bill was signed on Monday 4/11/11. It goes into effect 90 days after the session ends on July 23.
Ranb |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|