January 9, 2007, 05:35 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 7, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh Pa.
Posts: 195
|
150....165.....180 Gr.!!!
I see the reasoning for the 150 gr. and the 180 gr. bullets but where in this choice does the 165 fit and for what reasons???
__________________
Gotta Love The Smell Of A Good Rifle Powder!!! |
January 9, 2007, 07:17 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 1999
Location: Arkansas USA
Posts: 436
|
I assume you speak 30 cal. If so I have at least 3 rifles that shoot the 165 / 168 gr rounds very accurately! My "target" 308, a Rem 700, is only OK with 150s, really bad with 180s, but sub MOA (like shoot the fly at a hunderd<L>) with 168 and almost that good with 165 Gamekings.
You have to understand that every rifle is different, so the greater the options, the better your chance to find just the right load for your rifle. |
January 10, 2007, 01:35 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2006
Posts: 2,519
|
For .30 caliber rounds..
I like the 165 Sierra SPBT for hunting, for all my rifles my hunting loads will cloverleaf @200yds from prone position. Its' about 2550, slower that commercial loads but I prefer accuracy not velocity.
For bigger game may load up some 180's. Also I use the 168 for Hi-power match (200-600yds) so I somewhat duplicate ballistics. |
January 10, 2007, 03:07 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
|
Quote:
|
|
January 10, 2007, 12:04 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 11, 2001
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,462
|
Most 30-06's I've had experience with seem to like that 165 weight.
Meaning it seems easier to come up with a very accurate load with that slug weight that any other in that chambering.
__________________
From my cold dead hands......... NRA certified rifle, pistol and shotgun instructor. Hunter education instructor |
January 10, 2007, 01:55 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 7, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh Pa.
Posts: 195
|
I had forgotten about, and didn't consider the accuracy isue!!!
As far as caliber...........30 caliber was what I was referring to........308 Win,.30-06, and the .300 mags! The 15 gr. jump seemed a bit small.............but then the jump from 180 gr. to 200 gr. is only 20 gr................Oh Well Winter And All!!!
__________________
Gotta Love The Smell Of A Good Rifle Powder!!! Last edited by rahtreelimbs; January 10, 2007 at 10:52 PM. |
January 10, 2007, 10:43 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2005
Location: Central , OR
Posts: 1,888
|
For my .308 win a 165,168grn bullet gives me the best performance and accuracy. For the 300 win. mag. it may be the 180grn. For the 30-378 it may be a 200grn.
So why is there a 150 grn .30 cal |
January 11, 2007, 10:06 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2002
Location: high up in the rockies
Posts: 2,289
|
All of my .30 cals seem to like 150. And by choosing the right 150, Speer BTSP for deer, and Barnes"X" for elk, I have no need for lighter or heavier bullets for anything in the lower 48.
__________________
If you think a mighty military force is expensive, wait 'til you see what a weak one costs. |
January 13, 2007, 03:11 AM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
|
Besides accuracy,
It is a compromise weight, and unlike many compromises, it actually works. Most of the speed and trajectory of the 150gr (sometimes even better), and most of the penetrating performance of the 180gr.
When shooting something smaller than the big .30 cal magnums, which have the powder to speed the 180s, the 165s are a fime choice, if your rifle likes them.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|