|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 26, 2009, 12:20 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,430
|
SURRRPRISE SURRRPRISE SURPRISE!!
Holder is not one to make a public policy speech without every word having a tactical purpose. Addressing gun control issues was neither a foolish slip of the tongue nor an generic, offhand remark. I said it before and am saying it again, they will use an event such as a school shooting, mall massacre, or Mexican drug lord violence as the catalyst for proposing what they have clearly stated is a core issue to them: gun control. |
February 26, 2009, 12:28 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2007
Posts: 551
|
Just tell me this... under the previous ban, were ALL magazines that held more than 10 rounds banned or just those for certain weapons? i.e. would me 15 round mag for my Sig P226 be illegal if we were back under the AWB?
|
February 26, 2009, 12:34 PM | #28 | |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Quote:
The latest versions of the 1994 AWB that were introduced in 2008 actually reduced the number to 5 rounds. |
|
February 26, 2009, 12:36 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 3, 2006
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 998
|
NRA email tool
http://www.nraila.org/ActionCenter/
Select write your reps and you can fire off emails to all of them at one time. |
February 26, 2009, 12:58 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
Didn't take Holder long to show his, and Obama's, true colors. Just sent E-mail messages to both Arizona senators (McCain & Kyl) and Congress woman Giffords urging them to oppose any AWB bill that is introduced.
|
February 26, 2009, 01:02 PM | #31 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,383
|
WHOA! Who would have thought that this would happen?
I love how Pelosi says that the Bush administration didn't enforce existing laws when in fact the Clinton administration, which forced passage of both the Brady Act and the 1994 AWB, did virtually NOTHING to enforce those laws. http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...009-02-26.html Pelosi tosses cold water on assault weapon ban By Mike Soraghan Posted: 02/26/09 11:59 AM [ET] House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tossed cold water on the prospect of reinstating the assault weapons ban, highlighting Democrats’ reluctance to take on gun issues. Attorney General Eric Holder raised the prospect Wednesday that the administration would push to bring back the ban. But Pelosi (D-Calif.) indicated on Thursday that he never talked to her. The Speaker gave a flat “no” when asked if she had talked to administration officials about the ban. “On that score, I think we need to enforce the laws we have right now,” Pelosi said at her weekly news conference. “I think it's clear the Bush administration didn’t do that.” Outside of the dig at the recent Republican president, that phrase is the stock line of those who don’t want to pass new gun control laws, such as the National Rifle Association. The White House declined to comment on Holder's remarks, referring reporters to the Department of Justice. The DoJ did not respond to The Hill's request for comment. |
February 26, 2009, 01:03 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2000
Location: Minnesota, Twin Cities
Posts: 1,076
|
No Surprises Here.
Any gun owner who voted for this fool and his band of merrymen should have understood that with a decidedly anti gun majority in both houses of congress, and a wolf in sheeps clothing (regarding gun rights) named Barack Obama, that he'd move quickly to implement a new ban on assault weapons. There were enough hints during the campaign, as well as his previous record to look at. This was a slam dunk for him, Reid, and Pelosi. And Joe Biden has never seen a gun control bill he didn't kiss and fondle until his hair plugs stood on end. I'm guessing most of us here understood that this was coming sooner, rather than later.
__________________
"If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams. Last edited by USAFNoDak; February 26, 2009 at 01:04 PM. Reason: clarity and punctuation. |
February 26, 2009, 01:03 PM | #33 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,383
|
Oh, and FAR more acceptable, Doc540.
Even Gomer approves... |
February 26, 2009, 01:03 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Quote:
As Speaker Pelosi's comments make clear, Democrats in Congress DO realize that this is a non-starter. Emails sent, anyway, to the nice folks in D.C.... Last edited by Evan Thomas; February 26, 2009 at 01:36 PM. Reason: punctuation... oh. horrors. |
|
February 26, 2009, 01:11 PM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: July 19, 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 84
|
What weapons were banned under the "Assault" Weapons Ban.
Wasn't it like 19 types? Were AR-15's banned for 10 years? I had no idea. I had read something a while back that the Assault term will be broadened if they try to push the ban. Why is it the legal gun owners fault that Mexico has a problem with cartels and our Federal govt can't control the border and trafficking. So the problem isn't addressed. The Federal govt is to protect our borders and protect it's citizens, not try and fix the problem by taking our guns away. |
February 26, 2009, 01:12 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,184
|
Quote:
|
|
February 26, 2009, 01:14 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
The media drives the public to this with their misinformation, and propaganda. This is where the battle must be fought, as well as in the congress. If gun rights activist were to send not one, but TWO letters, it would be exponentially more effective.
The first letter should go to you representatives in congress, and the second to any SPONSOR of any network running the propaganda. Let the SPONSORS know that their financial support of anti-constitutional propaganda comes with a a heavy price. Tell them that you will boycott any service or product that their corporations or any of their underlings produce or provide. Corporations are responsible to their stockholders, legally, and otherwise. Using corporate funds to promote their political agendas should not be tolerated. I guarantee that if a sponsor KNEW they would be the subject of scorn by a significant portion of the population, they would think twice about forking over millions for network sponsorship. We have to hit them where it hurts. And we need both a carrot and a stick. I just described the stick. The carrot could be: if you hear a network run a story or documentary favorable to our cause, send an email to their sponsor explaining that you appreciate their sponsorship, and that it will positively impact your future buying decisions. Last edited by maestro pistolero; February 26, 2009 at 01:32 PM. |
February 26, 2009, 01:21 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 16, 2007
Posts: 2,153
|
I hate to say it, and it's way too risky to be adopted as a strategy, but if the WORST were to happen, and they got their ban, there may be a silver lining.
There would then be an opportunity to get a SCOTUS ruling, once and for all, that civilian (semi-auto) versions of standard military small arms are protected, due to their direct relationship to militia use. Wouldn't THAT be nice? I am unaware of any other scenario that would set up a SCOTUS case so directly. Believe me, I don't wish for it, because it could be disaster. But Heller could have been a disaster, too. |
February 26, 2009, 01:22 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Location: Ona,West Virginia
Posts: 1,215
|
Hey did you all see the follow up story about
U.S. Guns Arming Mexican Drug Gangs; Second Amendment to Blame? Mexico's strict gun laws are being subverted by the easy availability of weapons in the U.S., the Mexican attorney general, Eduardo Medina-Mora Icaza, told ABC News. "The Second Amendment," said the attorney general, "is certainly not designed to arm and give fire power to organized crime abroad." More than 3,400 people have been killed by the drug cartels in the last 15 months, 2,000 of them law enforcement officials, according to the Mexican attorney general. U.S. and Mexican officials say they have traced most of the thousands of high-powered weapons seized from the drug cartels to gun dealers in Texas, California and Arizona. |
February 26, 2009, 01:28 PM | #40 | |
Member
Join Date: August 4, 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
|
|
February 26, 2009, 01:29 PM | #41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2006
Location: Western Montana
Posts: 913
|
Quote:
|
|
February 26, 2009, 01:34 PM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
dabigguns357
Quote:
Of course, this still leaves the question of who's feeding the media this "OMG GUNS ARE GOING TO MEXICO!!" stuff... |
|
February 26, 2009, 01:39 PM | #43 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
|
Do ya love the infighting here:
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...009-02-26.html Pelosi knows there is an election cycle coming up and she wants to keep her seat.. Attention corrupt dealers in the great southwest.....they know who you are, watch indictments come left and right WildcloseemdownAlaska ™ |
February 26, 2009, 01:40 PM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2000
Location: Minnesota, Twin Cities
Posts: 1,076
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams. |
|
February 26, 2009, 01:42 PM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,531
|
That sure came a lot faster than I expected. Not surprising, but I thought they'd wait a bit to gage next election prospects and make this either an end-of-term or second-term initiative. I don't take Pelosi's resistance as an indication she's suffering from an acute infection of common sense, but rather that she realizes the smorgasbord powergrab going on is burning all the Dem's political capital about two years too early.
Hopefully the bill would/will get smacked down. I don't want to bank on getting a ruling favoring bayonet lugs and pistol grips. So who's going to give Gaffemaster Joey a buzz and let him know that Beretta makes hi-cap handguns and carbines? (Are we still in violation for talking politics if the administration forced the hand? It's only self-defense, right? ) |
February 26, 2009, 01:46 PM | #46 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,383
|
"The Second Amendment," said the attorney general, "is certainly not designed to arm and give fire power to organized crime abroad."
And I don't recall our Constitution being written in a manner conducive to helping a foreign nation control its criminal elements when, in fact, they have never been able to do so. |
February 26, 2009, 01:49 PM | #47 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,728
|
To the President:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
NRA Member NC Hunter's Education Instructor PCCA Member (What's PCCA you ask? <- Check the link) |
||
February 26, 2009, 01:50 PM | #48 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2000
Location: Minnesota, Twin Cities
Posts: 1,076
|
Mike Irwin posted:
Quote:
__________________
"If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams. |
||
February 26, 2009, 01:51 PM | #49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Posts: 1,149
|
Holder seems like a loose cannon.
I'd like to think the Democrats in the House and Senate are aware of how tenuous their lead is and how many of those seats they just won are from areas that won't re-elect someone who bans guns. |
February 26, 2009, 01:51 PM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Quote:
He's from Nevada, fergoshsakes. |
|
|
|