The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 20, 2009, 06:53 PM   #1
jholland
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2008
Posts: 4
Looking for Kahr (Auto Ordnance) Thompson info about NFA conversions...

Hey guys... I just got a Auto Ordnance TA5 Thompson Lightweight Deluxe Pistol in the hopes of doing the NFA paperwork then adding a stock for an SBR and going full auto. I need some resources. I know what I need to do the NFA stuff but I need to know where to get the stock and the full auto conversion done. Is there a gunsmith that specializes in converting these into full auto and adding stocks?

Throw me some links or directions please...

THANKS!!!!

Jason
jholland is offline  
Old April 20, 2009, 06:58 PM   #2
B. Lahey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,857
Full-auto isn't going to happen. Conversions have been a no-go since around '86 unless you are a manufacturer/dealer selling to cops/mil.

SBR shouldn't be a problem, though.

If you do a search, I think VUPDblue wrote a FAQ a while back.
__________________
"A human being is primarily a bag for putting food into; the other functions and faculties may be more godlike, but in point of time they come afterwards."
-George Orwell
B. Lahey is offline  
Old April 20, 2009, 07:36 PM   #3
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
As said before, Full auto is a no-go.

Not sure about the stock. I thought they made the gun so it was difficult to attach a stock.

Here is the link to VUPDblue's FAQ FAQ's
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old April 20, 2009, 07:58 PM   #4
jholland
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2008
Posts: 4
I'm assuming all I need is a stock to be made to fit the contour of the frame and have the frame drilled by a gunsmith. The custom butt stocks are $110 from Dan Block and he custom makes them for the gun. I just don't know who to send the gun to in order to have it drilled for the stock. Anyone have a gunsmith they trust that doesn't take 2 years to get to work that needs to be done? Are there any Thompson specific gunsmiths out there? I just found the guys website that makes the stocks but I'm coming up blank on gunsmiths for Thompsons.

Thanks, Jason
jholland is offline  
Old April 20, 2009, 08:32 PM   #5
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
how much are you sinking into this project?

I just found this in about 5 seconds with google. http://www.shopwiki.com/detail/d=Tho...my_Gun_-_M1SB/

If they were half that price I would go for one.
__________________
"9mm has a very long history of being a pointy little bullet moving quickly" --Sevens
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old April 20, 2009, 08:54 PM   #6
jholland
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2008
Posts: 4
Current retail on them is just over 1k for the pistol. Dan Block just wrote me back and confirmed he can take care of the butt stock install with a custom butt stock that will match the rest of my wood for about $200 or so and HE will complete the machining of 3 holes needed to mount the stock to the frame and he's comfortable with it's strength. So with the ATF fee I'm looking at $1400.

TOO bad about the full auto. For some reason I thought you could still do conversions along with SBR and suppressors...
jholland is offline  
Old April 20, 2009, 10:43 PM   #7
David Hineline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 1999
Location: South Sioux City, Nebraska
Posts: 704
I would just get the factory short barrel rifle rather than form 1 on the aluminum framed pistol. That way no personal markings are needed on the gun. Have you talked to your local CLEO to make sure they will even sign the forms for you to get said NFA item?

http://www.auto-ordnance.com/PA-1TH_tsb.html#batf
David Hineline is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 03:21 AM   #8
impalacustom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Posts: 492
If you were planning on making the stock a detachable one your in for more than just drilling 3 holes on the frame. I won't explain the steps unless thats what you were planning on doing.

I converted my 1927 to a detachable stock but it's not the pistol, it is the regular rifle version. There are some Tommy only gunsmiths out there and they are not cheap at all, and the skies the limit on what you can do to them cosmetically.

Making a new Kahr full auto can't happen unless you have a whole lot of time and a whole lot of money, the receiver on the new Thompsons are not the same size as the old ones and you can't use any of the original parts from a 1921 or 1928 unless you do a lot of modification, it is cheaper to buy a real one then.

Also, you will be better off to buy a SBR with the steel receiver from Kahr instead of going SBR on the one you have. The cost will be less in the long run.
impalacustom is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 07:57 AM   #9
cat9x
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
I've got a factory Kahr M1 SBR. I'd recommend doing that, it's much easier.
cat9x is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 11:28 AM   #10
Hitech78
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 26, 2005
Posts: 14
Quote:
Current retail on them is just over 1k for the pistol. Dan Block just wrote me back and confirmed he can take care of the butt stock install with a custom butt stock that will match the rest of my wood for about $200 or so and HE will complete the machining of 3 holes needed to mount the stock to the frame and he's comfortable with it's strength. So with the ATF fee I'm looking at $1400.

Your math is off by $200, you need to pay $200 to MAKE it a SBR and another $200 for the stamp.
Hitech78 is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 12:33 PM   #11
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
@Hitech78
$1000 for the pistol
$200 for the form 1 tax stamp (before work is done on gun)
$200 for the stock work.

= $1400. Where is this other $200 coming from?

@ jholland I just hope your aluminum frame holds up.
__________________
"9mm has a very long history of being a pointy little bullet moving quickly" --Sevens
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 12:36 PM   #12
Hitech78
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 26, 2005
Posts: 14
I thought you had to pay a total of $400 in fees...
$200 to MAKE/register
$200 to get the class III stamp

I was thinking about doing this to an 870 but I didn't want to pay $400....I might do it for $200. I must have been mislead.

Last edited by Hitech78; April 21, 2009 at 12:44 PM.
Hitech78 is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 04:18 PM   #13
cat9x
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
aluminum frame? No thanks
cat9x is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 08:27 PM   #14
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
Move to Montana and find a Machinist!!! Full auto's back baby!!!
JK, someone is going to jail over that bill. If not how awesome would that be?
Hi-points are made in Ohio, so I would probably be able to get a full auto hipoint 9mm carbine.

OH my!!!
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 08:57 PM   #15
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
Quote:
Move to Montana and find a Machinist!!! Full auto's back baby!!!
Full autos aren't covered under that law. That's not the point anyway.

First, that law is a big middle finger toward the federal government. (That by itself makes it a good thing.) Second, the law will be challenged and the best way to get it to go in our favor is for someone to produce a 100% Montana made single shot .22LR and not an open bolt MAC-10. (Political correctness is a PITA, but that's the game we have to play.)

Once/if single shot .22s get OK'd, then we can move up to mag fed bolt 22's, then semi-auto mag fed 22's, then short barreled semi-auto mag fed 22's, then semi-auto mag fed centerfires, then maybe we might be able to get full auto back. (Then we can move onto suppressors.)

Remember, baby steps is how the gun grabbers have been able to do what they have. We can beat them at their own game. If we go for all or nothing we will end up with nothing.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old April 21, 2009, 11:17 PM   #16
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 3,006
Quote:
Full autos aren't covered under that law. That's not the point anyway.

First, that law is a big middle finger toward the federal government. (That by itself makes it a good thing.) Second, the law will be challenged and the best way to get it to go in our favor is for someone to produce a 100% Montana made single shot .22LR and not an open bolt MAC-10. (Political correctness is a PITA, but that's the game we have to play.)
I'm sorry, I missed a post. What law are you guys talking about?
__________________
"9mm has a very long history of being a pointy little bullet moving quickly" --Sevens
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 02:54 AM   #17
impalacustom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Posts: 492
This one Willie http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm
Alaska is just passed something very similar and from what I hear Texas is on it's way to doing the same.
impalacustom is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 08:13 AM   #18
Ricklin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: SW Washington state
Posts: 2,011
No full auto

The bill specifically excepts firearms that fire 2 or more bullets with one pull of the trigger, so no new manuf. full autos, even in Montana.

Ya gotta read the bill!!
__________________
ricklin
Freedom is not free
Ricklin is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 03:24 PM   #19
saboteur
Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2006
Posts: 27
correct me if i'm wrong:

I thought that since it is already a pistol, he would only have to register it as an AOW ($5 tax stamp) to add a butt-stock.
saboteur is offline  
Old April 22, 2009, 05:11 PM   #20
Ridge_Runner_5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,925
AOW is $200 to register, $5 to transfer...and that is only for things like a VFG. If he wants a stock, he has to make it an SBR...
Ridge_Runner_5 is offline  
Old April 23, 2009, 12:39 PM   #21
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
If it has a butt-stock, it is by definition either a SBR or SBS. AOW's can't have butt-stocks.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old April 23, 2009, 12:45 PM   #22
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,981
To further confuse things, some AOWs CAN have stocks. Ex.- Marble's Game Getter.
The OP's gun would be a SBR, though.
__________________
Bill DeShivs, Master Cutler
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10301 seconds with 10 queries