The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 20, 2012, 12:23 PM   #1
codyj1122
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 4
Rifle Question/ Hunting Distance

I have a Winchester 270 but I recently placed a treestand on a spot of my property where I will have a long view over a ridgeline for white tail this season. Im looking to get another gun to mess around with and I think I want to get a 6.5 Creedmoor I was just wondering if someone can specify the main difference for me between the creedmoor and 6.5x55 I would greatly appreciate the inputs.
codyj1122 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 12:43 PM   #2
Rebel9793
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 134
why not just use the .270?
Rebel9793 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 12:48 PM   #3
codyj1122
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 4
It was my grandfathers gun who had passed and I am just not wanting to put the wear and tear on it anymore. I may get a synthetic 270 if I dont go with a 6.5.
codyj1122 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 12:51 PM   #4
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
There isn't very much difference between the Creedmor and 6.5x55 and both are very close to the 270.
With the 270 at 100 yds or less the 130 gr is too fragile ,use the 150.
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 01:09 PM   #5
codyj1122
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 4
I currently use a 150 learned my lesson last year lol. I really like my 270 just figured i would give something else a try for a while. If i go with a 6.5 do you think I should just go with the 6.5x55 or the creedmoor i heard complaints of the Creedmoor ammo being a little annoying to get. I wasn't sure if this was still currently a issue.
codyj1122 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 05:29 PM   #6
Rebel9793
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 134
I understand. If you want something different, maybe a .308? can find that ammo just about anywhere.
Rebel9793 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 08:31 PM   #7
codyj1122
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 4
I give the .308 a thought that is another one i may consider.
codyj1122 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 08:54 PM   #8
Rebel9793
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 134
its a great round. lots of different bullet weights/types. not to mention it packs on helluva punch without that stiff of a kick.
Rebel9793 is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 09:00 PM   #9
math teacher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 5, 2012
Location: Southwest WA Coast
Posts: 558
Gee, how did Jack O'Connor manage to kill just about everything in North America with a 130 grain bullet from his 270? Pick a good bullet and 130 grain will do just fine. You might consider puting a synthetic stock on grandpa's rifle and using it, just take care of the rifle. The stock is the part that gets dinged up the most. I am sure your grandfather would have wanted you to hunt with his rifle rather than turning it into a closet queen. You can always put gramp's stock back on later.
math teacher is offline  
Old October 20, 2012, 11:28 PM   #10
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
The starting point for any decision in comparing cartridges is the bullet weight and muzzle velocity. Most anything from around 100 grains to 180 grains and muzzle velocities above 2,600 or 2,700 ft/sec will do just fine for Bambi.

Range to around 400 or 500 yards is limited by basic skills and knowledge of the trajectory. But, generally, skill at doping the wind is highly important beyond 300 yards.

"...I will have a long view over a ridgeline for white tail..."

1. Is that actually overlooking a ridgeline? As in looking down on? I'd hope it doesn't mean shooting past a ridgeline.

2. About how long is this long view?
Art Eatman is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 09:41 AM   #11
hooligan1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2010
Location: Independence Missouri
Posts: 4,585
Quote: with the .270 at 100 yds or less the 130 grn is too fragile , use the 150.

Absolutely Not true Mete, I use the Nosler Accubond, and it's a bad boy at that range... Shot a big buck last year right through the ribs just behind the shoulder went clean through with a .277 entrance and a nickle exit, but it wasn't too fragile.
Proper bullets at proper velocities!
__________________
Keep your Axe sharp and your powder dry.
hooligan1 is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 10:25 AM   #12
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Via a .270, folks been killing Bambi for decades with the 130. That's pretty much been the standard since the .270 was first introduced. Back nearly fifty years ago, I used the Remington Bronze Point.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 05:13 PM   #13
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
Probably easier to find a rifle in 6.5 Swede than Creedmore.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 07:09 PM   #14
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
My comments should have been preceeded by defining things . I like to eat my venison ! I used a 6.5x55 for 25 years [the original specs with 140 gr] with great success. Very little meat ever lost. I have seen and butchered deer shot at under 100 yds with the 130gr 270.Spectacular kills yes ,meat damage ? far too much for me.
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 08:13 PM   #15
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
Aw, mete, didn't nobody never tell ya that you're not s'posed to shoot 'em in the eatin' part? There's a reason God gave Bambi a white spot.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 09:06 PM   #16
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
Eatin' part ? My shots are normally lung shots . I butchered a friends deer shot through the shoulders with a 130 270 . I threw out most of the shoulders ." it puts them down like lightning" he said .One first time experience for me - I was slicing up the thickest part of the ham and noticed a small whole .That went half way through that section .What was it ? Secondary projectile , a piece of bone almost 1/8 " from the shoulder all the way back through the ham !!
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old October 21, 2012, 11:10 PM   #17
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,242
Well you are going to get a lot of meat damage if you place any bullet through the shoulders even with the Swede. Deflate the lungs and you ruin very little as long as you don't hit an offside shoulder. Never had a problem ruining too much meat with a .270 inside 100 or past 400 on deer, lost one offside shoulder on a cow elk once though.
__________________
NRA Life Member
taylorce1 is offline  
Old October 22, 2012, 08:12 PM   #18
sc928porsche
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
I use a 300WM through the boiler room..........no problem with meat loss. However the liver and heart are always kaput. Yeah, it almost always takes part of a rib out the other side, but there isnt much meat on the ribs anyway.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it.
sc928porsche is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07261 seconds with 10 queries