|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 7, 2015, 01:42 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 5, 2015
Posts: 171
|
Hard cast vs Jacketed Loads
Am I correct in using loads for jacketed bullets reduced 5% for hard cast?
|
June 7, 2015, 01:56 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,525
|
It's not that simple.
What do you plan on loading? Caliber, bullet, powder, etc. What is your purpose? Target, range practice, self defense, high recoil practice, etc. What concern do you have that prompts you to believe in a 5% reduction?
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
June 7, 2015, 02:22 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Yeah, the load data is powder and bullet specific for a reason.
Use only the data for the exact powder you are using, with the bullet you are using, with the recommended bullet depth in the case. Getting creative with reloading is for the experts.
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” Last edited by g.willikers; June 7, 2015 at 02:28 PM. |
June 7, 2015, 03:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
The load data is powder and bullet weight and material specific for a reason. You can't drive any cast bullet as fast as a jacketed. Cast bullets usually use different powders than jacketed too. So no you are not right.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
June 7, 2015, 03:57 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2014
Location: Nevada/Ariz/CA
Posts: 1,753
|
Probably most everone's "default" in reloading questions like the OP's pertain to handgun loading, but if rifle, that should be indicated (as well as handgun), since responses between the two will vary considerably. But for now the responders are assuming, no doubt correctly, you are referring to handgun loading rather than to use of cast bullets with rifle caliber loads. Using reduced cast bullet rifle loads, especially for some indoor shooting however, can be very practical from reduced expense and prolonging barrel life points of view. I realize this has gone off on somewhat of a tangent but posters really need to be specific and furnish details relative to what they are asking.
__________________
Ouch, the dreaded "M-1 thumb", you just know it will happen eventually, so why not do it now and get it over with?? Last edited by condor bravo; June 7, 2015 at 05:09 PM. |
June 7, 2015, 04:16 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,317
|
Quote:
Not to continue to dump on the op but if you don't have one, one of the reloading manuals would serve you well with both cast and jacketed information. http://www.amazon.com/SPEER-Reloadin...ding+manual+15 http://www.amazon.com/Lyman-49th-Edi...3KEN7EPPT93TSV http://www.amazon.com/Hornady-Editio...25BPPTN7JK3V3A |
|
June 7, 2015, 04:45 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,459
|
I surely agree it's not that simple, but let me share some real world examples.
.45 Colt Ruger Blackhawk 7 1/2" bbl: 300 Hornady XTP 22.0 gr H110 1,216 fps avg. 325 Cast Performance 23.0 gr H110 (1 gr below Hodgdon max) 1,346 avg. Hardcast generally has less friction than jacketed, therefore a little more velocity. But you had best work up slowly for loads like this, and never without some published test data. What are you working on? Give us some specifics, and we'll give specific advice, or even better, real world results. |
June 7, 2015, 10:54 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 890
|
With handguns, cast bullets generally give less pressure and more velocity than jacketed bullets of the same weight (ligonierbill shows a good example above). Cast bullets in rifles need to be kept down to around 2300 fps even with gas checks. I have no idea where the 5% thing came from, as each cartridge is a loading problem of its own.
|
June 8, 2015, 12:45 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,525
|
Quote:
Important rudimentary fact that every loader should know as general knowledge.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
|
June 11, 2015, 12:42 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 2010
Posts: 379
|
ligonierbill, your load for the cast performance boolit is the same powder charge and same velocity as my 325 grain hot rod setup out of the Bisley Blackhawk. My most accurate load is a mild load of 13 grains of HS-6 with the same 325 grain boolit at 1120 fps.
|
June 11, 2015, 05:50 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,459
|
Thanks, I am mostly loading 255's at less than warp speed. Those hot loads always bust my knuckle. I am working some Cast Performance 360's, so stand by for a new thread.
|
June 11, 2015, 07:23 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
|
|
June 11, 2015, 08:53 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2000
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,761
|
A cast bullet should develop more pressure than a jacketed bullet because it forms to the bore more efficiently than a jacketed bullet. However, it does give less friction than a jacketed bullet. That, and a cast bullet is generally sized larger than a jacketed bullet.
|
June 11, 2015, 10:19 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 189
|
A cast bullet should develop more pressure than a jacketed bullet because it forms to the bore more efficiently than a jacketed bullet. However, it does give less friction than a jacketed bullet. That, and a cast bullet is generally sized larger than a jacketed bullet.
If a cast bullet gives less friction than a jacketed bullet, doesn't that equal less pressure? |
June 11, 2015, 12:25 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
You can think about whatever theory you want, but I handgun hunt with Hornday jacketed XTP bullets. I duplicate them with cast SWC bullets of the same weight for target practice. Whether it be 240gr .44 Mag, or 158gr .357, with identical loads, the cast bullets are always faster.
|
June 12, 2015, 03:36 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2008
Location: Colo Spgs CO
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
The one single factor that, IMO, makes it almost impossible to use 'common sense' or 'intuition' to explain actual results is that burn rate and pressure both depend on burn rate and pressure. Combine that with the liklihood that the static friction of each bullet type--the amount of pressure it takes to get the bullet moving in the first place--is likely also different between the two, and so that impacts the peak chamber pressure, presumably. I wouldn't expect a better-sealing bullet to make as much of a dent in the efficiency of a revolver though, in terms of percentage increase in MV. Sort of like trying to keep boat afloat that has a 2" hole and 1/4" hole in the hull, and you plug the 1/4" hole and expect things to improve. Again, intuition doesn't save the day here. Anyway, rather than speculate and use intuition, this seems like a case where actual experience serves best. In an earlier post, identical loads with identical weight bullets from the same firearm produced what I think was at least a 10% increase in muzzle velocity. I know I generally end up using identical charges for both cast and jacketed, but have never intentionally done a side-by-side comparison. In tens of 1000s of rounds shot in handgun, I've never seen any significant issues with pushing cast just as hard as jacketed--the oft-cited threshold of 1,000 fps or so is pretty much pure nonsense.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member “If I had to live my life again, I'd make the same mistakes, only sooner.” T Bankhead "I think only the authorities should have weapons." The New American Electorate Last edited by Bongo Boy; June 12, 2015 at 04:00 PM. |
|
June 12, 2015, 07:15 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 890
|
I pulled some loads from the most recent online load data from Ramshot. Comparing loads of 44 mag with two different pairs of bullets, lead and jacketed. In both examples, the lead bullet developed more velocity with less pressure using more powder.
Counter-intuitively, bullet diameter has very little effect on pressure. P.O. Ackley did some tests decades ago loading the next full caliber larger into cartridges and firing them (e.g.: .284 bullets in a 270 Win). You would think they'd blow up the rifle, but the effects were negligible. |
June 13, 2015, 10:50 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 2000
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,761
|
The problem for some of us...at least for me, is that I have no scientific way of actually measuring the pressure, so its sort of a spitball theory
|
June 14, 2015, 01:35 AM | #19 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 22, 2014
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,549
|
The correct answer is it depends on the specific loading for handgun or rifle and the individuals expertise at casting and reloading.
I hardcast and I am shooting gaschecked 160 grain bullets out of my 1956 Remington 721 in 30-06 at 2500 fps with no leading. I also handgun hunt with a .44 magnum and use Hornady XTP hollow points for SD and my 240 grain hard casts for practice and hunting with no leading. I use 22.7 grains of 296. |
June 14, 2015, 07:19 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: March 7, 2015
Posts: 47
|
I think you cannot really state a hard and fast rule. Way too many variables. Several that you miss, and sorry, if you are assuming identical, you would be wrong as each bullet is shaped different. Oal was never mentioned, this plays big factor. Just looking up Lyman manual 49th version for my 9mm, same bullet weight, two different powders give alternative results, velocity is fairly consistent, cast is faster, but pressure can be high for one powder and lower for different. Max and min powder volumes can be same or vary, different results... Don't make blanket statements, use published data, and vary at your own risk.....and published is not what you find in forums. Be very careful in using that....
|
June 14, 2015, 08:37 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 1,752
|
A straight up 5% reduction from jacketed to cast is not going to work in all instances, things like this never do, just too many variables .
This 5% reduction might be more applicable for plated bullets, they aren't as hard as jacketed but are harder than cast . If you wish to load cast, use cast bullet data....Lyman Cast Bullet Handbook is a wealth of information, even listing pressures of loads. I have both the #3 and newer #4 editions and find them invaluable, highly recommend you get one. Gary |
June 15, 2015, 04:24 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2009
Location: Deary, Ideeeeeeho
Posts: 531
|
Poconolg,
You give far too little information for us to give good answers that may apply to your need. However, as said earlier by a poster that cast bullets can not be driven to the velocities of jacketed bullets, I'll have to say, That Depends! Frankly to develop high quality cast bullet loads it is very likely to take much more load development when compared to "J" bullets. The simple reason it the much higher level of variables. However, from my RUGER #1 - 45/70 I have done a bunch of testing with loads of over 2000fps, testing as high as just over 2500fps and hunting with a 355gr Wide Flat Nose cast at 2300fps. It is not uncommon for some cast bullet shooters to exceed those velocities. I have found a 465gr Cast WFN at 1650fps to be MUCH better in the end result area, but am currently in the process of testing IMR 4895 with this bullet and should I see much improved groups over my current load or H335, I will possibly end up with a load in the 1700 - 1800fps range. Typically a cast bullet develops less pressures the a "J" bullet of equal weight, but as has been suggested, get some information from a good source before you make a serious mistake. Lyman is one good source for such info. Crusty Deary Ol'Coot |
June 16, 2015, 10:10 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
Poco,
Invest in Lyman's pistol and revolver reloading manual, it covers cast and jacketed bullets. Lots of loads and lots of info that may be helpful to you. |
|
|