m1 receiver questions

orsogato · September 28, 1999, 11:04 AM

Hi all,

I am rebuilding an m1 rifle. I want to have my receiver refinished as there is some wearing on the op rod rail guide, and the original finish is quite worn.

The receiver is an H&R. Would blueing help protect the receiver at all, or should I just have it re-parkerized? The main goal is not so much to make the gun look pretty but to protect the receiver from any more wear.

Thanks

Orso

. · September 28, 1999, 06:05 PM

Orso,
I'm copying your question to The Smithy forum, as I believe you will get a faster and more practicable response to your question there.

------------------
Mykl
~~~~~
"If you really want to know what's going on;
then, you have to follow the money trail."
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Gale McMillan · September 28, 1999, 06:59 PM

I would have it re parkerized. The reason being that pakerizing holds oil .We make parts for a Mini gun and certain parts absolutely will not function unless they are parkerized. It's the lurication properties of the oil held in the finish. When all the moving parts of the rotor are operating if they are not parkerized they just freeze up

**4V50 Gary** · September 28, 1999, 07:19 PM

I concur with Gale. From my experience, a parker finish is very durable and besides, it's historically accurate for the M1. If you have a bead blaster, you can parkerize it in the comfort of your own home on the stove (just don't let the missus know what your up to).

------------------
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt

orsogato · September 29, 1999, 08:57 PM

thanx all,

I am going to get it re parkerized.

September 28, 1999, 11:04 AM	#1
orsogato Senior Member Join Date: July 20, 1999 Location: Steeler Country Posts: 628	Hi all, I am rebuilding an m1 rifle. I want to have my receiver refinished as there is some wearing on the op rod rail guide, and the original finish is quite worn. The receiver is an H&R. Would blueing help protect the receiver at all, or should I just have it re-parkerized? The main goal is not so much to make the gun look pretty but to protect the receiver from any more wear. Thanks Orso

September 28, 1999, 06:05 PM	#2
. Senior Member Join Date: October 6, 1998 Location: My wife's house... Posts: 2,659	Orso, I'm copying your question to The Smithy forum, as I believe you will get a faster and more practicable response to your question there. ------------------ Mykl ~~~~~ "If you really want to know what's going on; then, you have to follow the money trail." $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

September 28, 1999, 06:59 PM	#3
Gale McMillan Member In Memoriam Join Date: September 10, 1999 Posts: 411	I would have it re parkerized. The reason being that pakerizing holds oil .We make parts for a Mini gun and certain parts absolutely will not function unless they are parkerized. It's the lurication properties of the oil held in the finish. When all the moving parts of the rotor are operating if they are not parkerized they just freeze up

September 28, 1999, 07:19 PM	#4
4V50 Gary Staff Join Date: November 2, 1998 Location: Colorado Posts: 21,833	I concur with Gale. From my experience, a parker finish is very durable and besides, it's historically accurate for the M1. If you have a bead blaster, you can parkerize it in the comfort of your own home on the stove (just don't let the missus know what your up to). ------------------ Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt

September 29, 1999, 08:57 PM	#5
orsogato Senior Member Join Date: July 20, 1999 Location: Steeler Country Posts: 628	thanx all, I am going to get it re parkerized.