July 16, 2008, 08:46 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: September 6, 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 44
|
Justified to Shoot?
Same situation, this justified to defend your family?
http://www.startribune.com/local/254...al%20+%20Metro
__________________
"Politicians and Bureaucrats, depend very much on the complicity of their victims, and like criminals, are flummoxed when we don't play the victim role." |
July 16, 2008, 08:57 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 18, 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 337
|
Depends on state.
In AZ You may shoot because of the molestation and also because of the significant number of bad guys.
__________________
XD 9mm service Ruger LCP Colt Python .357 magnum AK-47 Mossberg 500 12 gauge |
July 21, 2008, 02:06 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
|
July 21, 2008, 02:18 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
I have just deleted a couple of off-topic posts. If you wonder why, please go take a look at Bud Helms' comments in the following thread: http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...d.php?t=302789
Stick to the topic, please. pax |
July 21, 2008, 05:28 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 16, 2007
Location: Gardendale, Alabama
Posts: 665
|
Yes, for what they were trying to do to the girl and for what they did to the father. Very much justified.
__________________
"What is play to the fool and the idiot is deadly serious to the man with the gun." Walt Rauch,Combat Handguns, May '08 |
July 21, 2008, 08:58 AM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Posts: 3,668
|
Seems to me that, of course, the application of lethal force was called for. I know for sure, that, if I'm attacked as was the victim in this case, and I have the ability to stop the attack by using my concealed firearm, I'll do my best to do just that.
(Sure hope that's not construed as "chest thumping"!) |
July 21, 2008, 01:06 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
|
"Justified to Shoot? - Yes.
"Same situation, this justified to defend your family?" - And yes, again.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective |
July 21, 2008, 01:30 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,117
|
That many young men molesting or attempting to sexually assault my daughter would certainly be justifiable grounds for shooting. That many physically assaulting my son would also be justified. One of the perps looked like he weighed in over 280 pounds.
Most states have statutes on the books that makes ganging up on a single victim a felony. Where a fist-fight between two men might only be a misdemeanor, two (or more) against one usually changes the charges, especially if the single victim is seriously injured. These group-attacks have been increasing in frequency and in violence in the last few years. It reminds me of a pack of wild dogs. One member alone is usually afraid, but in a pack they're insanely viscious.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately) |
July 21, 2008, 01:38 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 3,925
|
"whose husband was severely beaten"
Clearly grave bodily harm. Unprovoked attack by a group. Deadly force was clearly justified.
__________________
"I swear to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemeis domestic or foreign WHOMSOEVER." |
July 21, 2008, 01:38 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2008
Posts: 175
|
AZ Med nailed it.
Groping your daughter is molestation and equal to rape as far as the step you may take to stop it. Combine that with a large disparity of force and you've got your green light. Furthermore, the law generally looks more favorably at older folks so if you're a man in your 40's that's another plus. That being said, if he'd shot them before things got ugly, I have my doubts as to whether he would have beaten the ride. |
July 21, 2008, 01:41 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: June 20, 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 96
|
This is a tough one..i had posted up on a THR poll.
I believe CC is illegal at the park and he obviously didnt make it to his car. Without knowing the details of the 'molestation' physical, verbal or other, I'd have to say that IF I was armed and IF my daughter were being molested by 1 or 8 does not matter, it would be a very tense situation. I'd like to think I'd have a few options to retreat or de-escalate..but I'm thinking nope. I'm protecting my family and self with everything I have at my disposal.
__________________
O.O.D.A Observe. Overreact. Destroy. Apologize. |
July 21, 2008, 01:44 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
|
In SC
Yes!
PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY ACT The stated intent of the legislation is to codify the common law castle doctrine, which recognizes that a person’s home is his castle, and to extend the doctrine to include an occupied vehicle and the person’s place of business. This bill authorizes the lawful use of deadly force under certain circumstances against an intruder or attacker in a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle. The bill provides that there is no duty to retreat if (1) the person is in a place where he has a right to be, including the person’s place of business, (2) the person is not engaged in an unlawful activity, and (3) the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent death, great bodily injury, or the commission of a violent crime. A person who lawfully uses deadly force is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action, unless the person against whom deadly force was used is a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his official duties and he identifies himself in accordance with applicable law or the person using deadly force knows or reasonably should have known the person is a law enforcement officer. H.4301 (R412) was signed by the Governor on June 9, 2006. |
July 21, 2008, 01:53 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: June 3, 2008
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 59
|
Considering that a person can use equal or slightly greater force to defend his/herself, the disparity of force in this attack, I believe that use of a deadly weapon would be justified.
However as a lone defender I would worry about being disarmed by a large group of attackers. To me it may be justified and legal, but would be a tough call to make. |
July 21, 2008, 02:02 PM | #14 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
|
Quote:
|
|
July 21, 2008, 02:09 PM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
Not just yes but heck yes.
There is no hesitation here for me. If my child was being molested and the bad guys refused to stop at my command there would be no further warning. If any one of them approached me they would be engaged. As for it being illegal to have a gun on park grounds even with a CWP...........oh well. I take my punishment knowing that I saved my daughter and myself from harm. I would die for my kids so jail is nothing. |
July 21, 2008, 02:20 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: June 3, 2008
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 59
|
I didn't say I wouldn't, just said it would be a tough call.
The father in this attack did protect his daughter without a deadly weapon. He is lucky to be alive, but still... |
July 21, 2008, 02:43 PM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 24, 2007
Posts: 296
|
When you get jumped by a group you are justfied, period. Shoot the SOBS.
|
July 21, 2008, 02:45 PM | #18 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
With or without a weapon my daughter is getting my help until I am physically unable to continue.
|
July 21, 2008, 03:01 PM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: June 3, 2008
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 59
|
With or without a weapon my daughter is getting my help until I am physically unable to continue.
Exactly, just as the father did in this attack. He was able to protect his family with no one getting shot and without presenting the BGs with the tool to kill him and his family outright. Still think it would have been justified though. |
July 21, 2008, 03:22 PM | #20 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
|
Quote:
"We'll all charge him together, he can't get all eight of us." "OK, big mouth, YOU get it first! Make your move." BTW, in this situation, I don't believe a warning ("Stop or I'll shoot!") is necessary, pull your piece and start blasting. |
|
July 21, 2008, 03:32 PM | #21 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
Quote:
He was acting on his fatherly instincts. If he had done the same (unarmed) to save a stranger I would admire his bravado and point out his lack of brains. It is foolish to engage multiple large men unarmed unless you are throwing yourself to the crocodile to save your loved one. |
|
July 21, 2008, 03:46 PM | #22 | ||
Member
Join Date: June 3, 2008
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, we are dealing in what-ifs, maybes, and suppositions. Was just throwing some out there. |
||
July 21, 2008, 04:54 PM | #23 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 2,933
|
Quote:
|
|
July 21, 2008, 05:00 PM | #24 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 1, 2006
Location: Tampa,Fl
Posts: 4,000
|
Quote:
|
|
July 21, 2008, 05:32 PM | #25 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Yes, empty the gun. Also an interesting rebuttal of the "You don't need more than 6 (or 8 or 10) rounds argument.
Although, it always goes without saying: Many, many BG's will run at the sight of a gun, even when it is 8 to 1. So maybe a revolver or low cap. auto would be enough.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
|