The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 6, 2014, 02:57 PM   #1
ColColt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2010
Posts: 354
Cleaning out Copper

I have a bottle of Sweet's 7.62 and a bottle of Wipeout. Which would be the best, in your experience, for cleaning the barrel, specifically copper? I know I could try for myself but was curious if anyone had used either of the products for any length of time.
__________________
Kids are for people that can't have dogs
ColColt is offline  
Old February 6, 2014, 03:33 PM   #2
me26245
Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2008
Location: midwest
Posts: 42
Sweets

I've used Sweets 7.62 for all my copper removal. It does a great job.
I use it when I get a used long gun to clean it up before I evaluate it.
If I've been shooting a particular weapon heavily I'll use Sweets afterwards to remove copper fouling before putting the weapon up.
I do a normal cleaning prior to using the Sweets.
me26245 is offline  
Old February 6, 2014, 07:37 PM   #3
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 7,478
Sweet's is generally considered to be the top end in aggressive copper fouling removers.

There might well be others AS effective, but I don't think anything else is MORE effective.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old February 6, 2014, 09:02 PM   #4
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
Where have you guys been? Get some Boretech Eliminator if you want the copper gone. Sweets can't touch that stuff.
603Country is offline  
Old February 6, 2014, 11:48 PM   #5
FoghornLeghorn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 961
I'm curious. My go-to gun is an old Browning Lever Rifle in 308. The bore is pretty much plated with copper but it still groups at about 1 to 1 1/2 inches at 100 yards.

As long as accuracy isn't negatively effected, what's the problem?

Also, and even if you get all the copper out, isn't it just going to reappear when you fire it again?
FoghornLeghorn is offline  
Old February 7, 2014, 12:32 AM   #6
Bezoar
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 578
COPPER SUCKS in small bore high velocity high pressure rifles. 243 takes a bit of work. me i use lots of soaking with #9 and patches. takes longer then my 30-30 with same chemicals but it does work.

now i could use sweets but the warnings about it hurting barrel steel makes me say 'if i let #9 sit in the bore half and hour its ok, but not if you go past that 15 minutes with sweets..."
Bezoar is offline  
Old February 7, 2014, 07:58 AM   #7
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
I have gone through a lot of Sweets and it did an excellent job.

A few years ago I found Wipe-Out, all I can say is WOW. Foam the barrel being careful not to get it everywhere and leave it sit. Later patch it out and presto, no more copper. I have found nothing as effective as Wipe-out and as easy as Wipe-out.

I still have a bottle of Sweets gathering dust on my shelf. I open it up once in awhile just to take a sniff to remind me how much I hate it and how much I prefer the odor free foaming method.
steve4102 is offline  
Old February 9, 2014, 07:52 PM   #8
oldcspsarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2008
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 441
IF you want to remove what you missed in copper fouling

you need to get Witches Brew by Darrel Holland.

www.midwayusa.com to order on-line. Nothing available does a better job !

I use it on 223, 22-250, 308 and 220 Swift. Makes a world of difference in my .17 Remington !
oldcspsarge is offline  
Old February 9, 2014, 08:04 PM   #9
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
Foghorn brought up an interesting point. I did find after taking ALL the copper out, accuracy suffered a bit till I laid down a bit more copper. It probably depends on the rifle and quality of the barrel, but I'm now of the opinion that you shouldn't take all the copper out. I'll just use Shooter's Choice till accuracy degrades, then I'll take the copper out.

This is what seems to work for me right now, but I reserve the right to show my feminine side and change my mind.
603Country is offline  
Old February 10, 2014, 06:02 PM   #10
hoghunting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2006
Posts: 1,559
Quote:
I have gone through a lot of Sweets and it did an excellent job.

A few years ago I found Wipe-Out, all I can say is WOW
That's my response too. Just spray Wipe-Out in the barrel, leave it overnight as it does not contain ammonia, then patch it out the next day. No odor, no scrubbing and no brushes. Can't get any easier than that.
hoghunting is offline  
Old February 10, 2014, 06:26 PM   #11
ColColt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2010
Posts: 354
I don't know what Wipeout has in it but it smells awfully strong to me-much like ammonia. I have it but the liquid, not the foam.
__________________
Kids are for people that can't have dogs
ColColt is offline  
Old February 11, 2014, 02:22 AM   #12
hoghunting
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2006
Posts: 1,559
Quote:
I don't know what Wipeout has in it but it smells awfully strong to me-much like ammonia. I have it but the liquid, not the foam.
The liquid cleaner is Patch-Out and this is part of the description from the website:

Quote:
XI. WIPE-OUT "PATCH-OUT" ™ contains NO ACID and NO AMMONIA.
http://www.sharpshootr.com/patchout.htm
hoghunting is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08551 seconds with 10 queries