The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 15, 2005, 08:01 AM   #76
Superhornet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 292
eeyore 11-------is it the intent, that everytime you face evil that you must run away or capitulate to the demands given ?? You see a crime being committed, a women beaten, a child hurt and we run away ?? Thats whats wrong in this country today. We have ran away from what is wrong for so long that the laws have become reversed and the victim is always blamed for the problem. But you are correct, I will retreat.........but only to reload if the chance is provided.......
Superhornet is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 08:12 AM   #77
OF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2000
Posts: 2,239
Eeyore, that is alot of 'if', speculation and add-water-and-mix psychoanalysis to bet your life on. And the outcomes of all of it firmly in the hands of your assailants.
Quote:
Those punks obviously believe that their genetic swelling is a gift that allows them to forgo a real job in order live the easy live of intimidating for money. Since they hate real work, they're not going to put much effort into anything that they don't consider fun. Mashing your face in might be fun, but that'll only happen if you're within reach. They might laugh when you run away, but they're not going to run after someone who may not have more than 35 cents on them.
That's quite the analysis you've done there, and you put all that together from your keyboard too! I imagine you'd be able to have them eating from your hand if you'd actually been able to see them...
Quote:
...warning signs that, had they been acted on, could have been handled (perhaps less than gracefully) without drawing.
More conjecture. You don't know what would have happened, you weren't there. It's possible the situation could have been defused without drawing, but it's also possible he could have had the living snot beaten out of him or worse. Again, an outcome determined by the assailants.
Quote:
Slightly less bad, a witness or cop sees me barking commands with gun drawn on two innocent and unarmed locals that just wanted to use the phone. I look like a paranoid/vigilante who's going to jail.
Yeah, I'd much rather have my family bawling by my hospital bed than be mistaken for a paranoid vigilante by some bystander.
Quote:
Thankfully, we know that the bullies left as soon as the gun was drawn.
Bullies? Lets call them what they were: robbers, criminals, muggers, bad guys, scum, slime, wastes of life. This wasn't a middle-school brawl shaping up here. The teacher wasn't going to come over and save him. He had only himself to rely on.

This hand-wringing and moral hair-splitting on the board here is so out of context that to just call it 'monday-morning quarterbacking' is being generous.

The man on the scene certainly thought the two 'bullies' were threatening enough to warrant displaying the weapon, the vast majority of 'reasonable persons' (in the legal sense) here on the thread seem to think that in his shoes, they'd do the same. And in support of his decision, it is worth noting that by displaying he ended the confrontation.

The bottom line is that by waiting longer than he did is putting himself at their mercy. The don't call that the 'point of no return' for nothing. Once they have the upper hand, once they are in the position of superiority (which they were moving to aquire), your life is no longer in your hands, it is in theirs.

That's the point: will you or will you not rely on the 'benevolence' of criminals for your continued existance? If you let them approach you, two men who obviously intend you no good to the point where they can control you if they so desire, what have you done? You've forfeited your life, that's what you've done. Maybe they'll let you go, maybe they won't. The point is it's no longer up to you.
OF is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 08:16 AM   #78
tjhands
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2005
Posts: 1,718
GRD, I can't believe you haven't received an "AMEN BRUTHA!" on your posts here. I'm with you, man. This guy who was almost attacked walked away without revokation of his Honor Card, his Man Card, and most importantly, his Life Card. Amen!
__________________
"If the sole purpose of handguns is to kill people, then mine are all defective." - Uncle Ted Nugent
tjhands is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 09:29 AM   #79
D.S. Brown
Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2004
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 57
GRD,

AMEN BROTHER!

I read your post after posting mine. I didn't realize that you were addressing another individual of less than sound judgement.

Again, AMEN BROTHER!

Beretta Cougar,

Without knowing the situation firsthand I would say that the gentleman acted reasonably and prudently. I submit that from the way you describe what should have occurred, had you been in the same situation as it transpired, you would have been robbed at the very least and dead at the very worst.

I don't know you personally. I don't know if you carry a weapon concealed. I don't know what your level of training is. I certainly don't know what your committment is to staying alive.

However from reading your point of view on this thread you may be dead and just not know it yet.

I too value human life and my life far exceeds the value of the two vermin described as the instigators in this thread. Remember they escalalated the situation. All they needed to do was mind their own business, let the gentleman in question use the phone unmolested without the implication of a threat implied or otherwise. They didn't do that. They anticipated that since there were two of them and one of him that they had the advantage. Of course they didn't know about the gun until they needed to. Once they became aware it appears sound judgement took over because these two wolves realized at that point that they had come across a sheep dog and not a sheep. Put it another way they realized that he had the advantage and that their lives were not worth the $10 that they were planning to forcibly extract from this person.

As I said I don't know your level of training and your level of judgement, but again just from what I've read are your responses to this thread, both appear low. You just seem too willing to give these predators the benefit of the doubt and too many advantages (as it was presented in this thread). For your safety and the safety of others that might be with you in a crisis get some solid training. It's out there, especially in Florida. I would recommend Options for Personel Security (OPS) which is based out of Sebring Florida. They do classes all over the Southeast and a little further North if I remember.

The life you save may be your own.

Respectfully,

Dave
__________________
Glock 23 .40 S&W DDT*** 9,500+ rounds
Glock 27 .40 S&W ELL*** 4,800+ rounds
Glock 35 .40 S&W GAD*** 3,400+ rounds
Glock 23 .40 S&W CLU*** 2,200+ rounds
D.S. Brown is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 09:42 AM   #80
Edison Carter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2005
Posts: 111
Quote:
eeyore 11-------is it the intent, that everytime you face evil that you must run away or capitulate to the demands given ?? You see a crime being committed, a women beaten, a child hurt and we run away ?? Thats whats wrong in this country today. We have ran away from what is wrong for so long that the laws have become reversed and the victim is always blamed for the problem. But you are correct, I will retreat.........but only to reload if the chance is provided.......
Superhornet, I agree with your sentiment.

But in this era there is a dreadful risk of legal persecution and civil litigation for involving oneself in what appears to be a crime of violence.

I carry a weapon to protect myself and my family, this is as far as I have clear legal right to do.

I have read of a case where a child has been attacked, asks for help from a passing motorist, and accuses said motorist of sexual assault.

I have read of cases where a woman is being beaten by a man, and when police or bystanders intervene she assaults the "rescuers".

Welcome to the twenty-first century.

EC
Edison Carter is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 10:55 AM   #81
eeyore_11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2005
Posts: 7
GRD,

None of us were there, so this entire thread is conjecture.

Quote:
The bottom line is that by waiting longer than he did is putting himself at their mercy. The don't call that the 'point of no return' for nothing.
I never suggested that he should have waited longer, what I'm trying to say is he waited too long. Not to draw, but to start actively dealing with the developing situation.

Moving away from the aggressors and away from the phone upon initial confrontation would have helped determine if the thugs were after him or just protecting 'their' phone. I may have mis-stereotyped them as the type that would back off at that point. Maybe not.

A CCW is supposed to be purely defensive, and only in life-threatening situations at that. I'm not saying this story didn't lead to a life-threateing situation, I'm merely suggesting that situation may have been avoided through prior action.

As it is, no one was attacted, no woman was beaten, and no child was hurt. While we know that a gun was brandished to protect the victims life, others may perceive that a gun was brandished because the victim wanted to use the phone.
eeyore_11 is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 11:32 AM   #82
shield20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 1,371
"When he gets to the phone two guys larger than himself start to walk toward him, and say that he would have to give them $10 to use that pay phone. He laughs and says yeah right. The guys tell him it's $10 or he wont be using that phone. He tells them to stop and not come any closer. They taunt and continue to get closer. when one starts to walk to his other side he pulls the gun. Both guys freak and throw up hands. He tells them to get lost, and they run."


Hmmm - Ok - so maybe replace "yeah right" with "no thank you sirs - I do not want to pay you $10". They insist & move closer, he says stop, they taunt and keep moving closer and split. He draws weapon...

Damn, what the hell do you "retreat without drawing" guys want him to do different? Seems the ONLY other thing he could have done would have been to see the 2 guys in proximity to the only phone around ahead of time and not even try to use it. (& then what?)
shield20 is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 11:37 AM   #83
OF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2000
Posts: 2,239
Exactly. I don't know how much finer this hair could be split...

What exactly should he have done differently. Lets have some kind of actual concrete detailing of how he could have handled this better.
OF is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 11:47 AM   #84
D.S. Brown
Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2004
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 57
Dr. Gary Kleck, whom I have met and spoken with, has done a study on the defensive uses of firearms, particularly handguns. I believe he is or was with Florida State but I can't remember. Anyway this study was done to illustrate said defensive uses and debunk anti-gun myths that handguns are useless for self defense. His study demonstrates that there are roughly 2,000,000 such usages annually by private law abiding citizens and excluding police confrontations.

He would state that this is a situation by which the presence of a handgun and the potential victim's willingness to present it prevented a crime from occurring. In fact Dr. Kleck would say that this is how the vast majority of those two million defensive usages occur. Most end this way without being reported to the police. The potential victim is left intact physically and financially and our criminal leaves still alive and moving up half a notch on the criminal Darwinian Scale. The latter criminal(s) isn't likely to contact local law enforcement regarding this incident because they probably have a pre-existing relationship with said organization and know that the latter may not believe their version of the story. Only in a small percentage of these encounters is the gun ever discharged and the number injured or killed is a smaller percentage than that.

After reading through these threads I find something that I believe is more disturbing and also a wake up call to us concealed handgun licensees.

Be advised that if you use your handgun lawfully there is still a great likelihood of a grand jury hearing followed by a jury trial if you don't get "no billed" by the grand jury. Okay the thought that scares me of that process is that both the grand jury and the trial jury will be peppered liberally with persons such as Beretta Cougar and eeyore, having entirely unrealistic expectations of a victims "obligations" and a criminals culpability in a possible lethal force encounter. No offense to either of you. I assume you're gun owners and possibly carry concealed lawfully in your respective states. I wouldn't consider either of you as being part of a jury of my peers.

Best,
Dave
__________________
Glock 23 .40 S&W DDT*** 9,500+ rounds
Glock 27 .40 S&W ELL*** 4,800+ rounds
Glock 35 .40 S&W GAD*** 3,400+ rounds
Glock 23 .40 S&W CLU*** 2,200+ rounds
D.S. Brown is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 01:33 PM   #85
eeyore_11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2005
Posts: 7
Quote:
What exactly should he have done differently. Lets have some kind of actual concrete detailing of how he could have handled this better.
The only detail is that I (would like to think I) would be moving away from the confrontation and phone before they got close or started a flanking maneuver, and therefore before I drew.

I will admit that may not be the best solution, just different. Maybe I am too worried about legal ramifications, but if I can stay untouched and avoid having to draw, that's the path I'll try to take.

Last edited by eeyore_11; July 15, 2005 at 01:34 PM. Reason: spelling
eeyore_11 is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 01:56 PM   #86
Peaceful Henry
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2005
Location: KCMO
Posts: 14
Where are you going to go?

To those that suggest some kind of retreat, where are you going to go? Back to the car that doesn't run (250 yards away)? To the deserted mall? Do you just want to see if the BGs are going to chase you and thus be justified in shooting them? If they don't know you're armed, why wouldn't they chase you? Sounds like a good plan to get a couple BGs killed, whereas how it actually ended up, no body got hurt.
Peaceful Henry is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 02:22 PM   #87
OF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2000
Posts: 2,239
Quote:
Maybe I am too worried about legal ramifications, but if I can stay untouched and avoid having to draw, that's the path I'll try to take.
Of course. And we should all be worried about legal ramifications, and I don't think anyone wants to shoot somebody no matter how evil they are. Life typically changes after that.

But it's important to recognize when you are and are not in serious danger. As was mentioned earlier a typical man standing still has the ability to cut you when inside of 20 feet or so in a couple of seconds, less time than 99% of CCW'ers can make a concealment draw on the range on a Sunday afternoon with your buds, let alone while backpedaling to avoid a rushing neanderthal or two in the dark.

It's also important to realize just how dangerous turning your back to an adversary like this is and factor that into your decision making. This is, IMO, one of the two great benefits of the new FL anti-run-away statute. Making a retreat because of legal pressure to do so can put you in more danger than standing your ground with a weapon. The decision to retreat should be based on the situation and what it requires, not fear of being sued or jailed when fighting for your life - and the minute those two slimes laid eyes on our hero here, he was fighting for his life from that point forward.

The other great benefit to the statute is that it tips the scales to the good guys in an official way. It's a huge societal middle finger to the criminal element. FIGHT CRIME, SHOOT BACK is just a bumper sticker, but that law is for real. It embodies the spirit that the community has had enough and it's time for the animals to start being fearful.
OF is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 04:06 PM   #88
eeyore_11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2005
Posts: 7
GRD

All valid points.

I guess I am picturing a situation where there was initially enough space (a couple rows of parking lot) between the hero and the assailants that some movement on his behalf could be accomplished without turning his back on them or giving up the only cover available. Rather than run I probably should have said cautiously make distance.

The story reads like the thugs continued walking towards the teller during the initial 'offer' and subsequent taunts, which to me suggests the conversation started at some distance.

Quote:
But it's important to recognize when you are and are not in serious danger.
Again, my position is the victim probably didn't realize soon enough he was in serious danger. If I was in his shoes, I would have been moving away in order to give the bullies another opportunity to break off and to keep as much distance as possible between them and me, which also reduces the chances of me being flanked. I have no problem with someone holding their ground, but had things gone badly (which wasn't the case here) I think they would have more difficulty staying out of jail and/or bankruptcy.

But I don't live in Florida.
eeyore_11 is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 04:32 PM   #89
Wraith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 22, 2004
Location: The Free State
Posts: 498
And you also don't know where they came from.

IMHO, he should have shot the bstrds.
__________________
June 23, 2003
GRATZ et al. v. BOLLINGER et al.
The day America died.


Never Forget 9/11.

Cold dead hands...
Wraith is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 04:44 PM   #90
joab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2002
Location: Orl Fla
Posts: 3,254
Quote:
I would have been moving away in order to give the bullies another opportunity to break off and to keep as much distance as possible between them and me, which also reduces the chances of me being flanked. I have no problem with someone holding their ground, but had things gone badly
One thing that you are forgetting.
His car was a out of commission, he needed access to that phone for his safety and well being.
His only other option was to assume the prey position and slink away to the safety of his car to wait for help to happen upon him.

These guys were predators sizing up their prey plain and simple.
At that point his only option was to assume an aggressive posture to let them know that he was prepared to meet the threat.
Anything less would have shown the weakness that predators look for. Sometimes standing your ground and even pushing back is the best way to deescalate.
__________________
Joab the Bugman
Founding member- Lords of Pomposity
It's a Yankee Doodle thing
joab is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 05:12 PM   #91
XavierBreath
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2002
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 2,800
Quote:
Sometimes standing your ground and even pushing back is the best way to deescalate.
Well put joab. Submission and retreat would not have de-escalated this confrontation.
__________________
Xavier's Blog
XavierBreath is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 07:43 PM   #92
BerettaCougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,224
Quote:
IMHO, he should have shot the bstrds.
If the anti's were a fire, this comment would be gas...just being dumped onto the fire.

He displayed his weapon to gain the upper hand, which in my opinion was a draw too soon, but he felt his life was at risk.. but shooting them would not have been just at all, man slaughter if you ask me.
BerettaCougar is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 09:20 PM   #93
tINY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 26, 2005
Location: Orygun
Posts: 2,589


Cougar, I don't think you are going to passify most of us here into thinking we shouldn't stand our ground. I must assume that you benefit from this.

Are you a thug too?



-tINY

tINY is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 10:24 PM   #94
BerettaCougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,224
Thug? far from it!

Passify members into not standing their grounds? when did I do that? or try?

Benefit from what??? I dont get your post, please explain it if you can/may?
BerettaCougar is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 10:45 PM   #95
Duxman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,294
Cougar,

May I ask why you are so concerned about what the anti's might think of our opinions?

Personally I really dont give a crap what the anti's think. Those of us who live in America have the right to free speech. And if we think that the person was in the right to draw, then so be it.

Let us not forget - we owe our freedom to the patriots who fought the oppressors at that time - the british. Outgunned, outnumbered, they fought with nothing more than guts and will.

What would our forefathers think of us now, blessed with the freedom to defend ourselves, giving in to the BG's because we are afraid of lawsuits or are too afraid to assert our moral imperative.

Certainly prudence should be excercised - not every situation calls for drawing our weapons or putting holes in BGs.

But when we are threatened, put in deliberate danger, hesitation is the worst enemy. Train, prepare, and so when the time comes, your muscle memory, instinct, and good judgement all combine to save your life.

Here's to hoping I never have to make this choice, as I hope none of you are subjected to it as well.
Duxman is offline  
Old July 15, 2005, 11:22 PM   #96
BerettaCougar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,224
I worry about what the anti's think, I do.. California/NYC/NJ/DC and every other anti state happened because the people of those states didnt care what the anti's thought.

I guess I was brought up and taught differently than most posters in this thread.. I will only draw if i absolutely think I will die or be badly injured if i dont.

My brother had to draw once, even my mother had to draw once, and in both cases they exhuasted all other options presented to them. both are happy with what they did, none have guilt on their minds, I never had to draw on someone, and i hope i never will have to, but if I ever have to draw on someone I would want to be able to look back and say to myself I did all I could but this person was set on taking my life.. but that doesnt seem like the mindset of the "I would of shot them" posters, to me it seems like their itching to shoot someone, just waiting for someone to give them justification.

I have so much to type but I am not great when it comes to wording things. so I will let some of you respond.
BerettaCougar is offline  
Old July 16, 2005, 12:17 AM   #97
generallobster
Member
 
Join Date: May 7, 2005
Posts: 19
I understand what Cougar is saying, but in this situation I doubt waiting longer or even trying to retreat would have changed the outcome, and it very well might have been worse for the victim as others have already concluded. The fact that it was an empty parking lot except for the three of them means there isn't really a place to retreat to once they have engaged. The friend could have tried to slowly walk backwards I guess, but the guys were walking toward him and would have simply followed. It doesn't seem likely that they would give up chase simply because the friend made it known that he wanted out of the situation. Anyone who's been mugged by two or more guys before understands this. Even if you haven't, it's not hard to picture. Cougars brother and mother apparently used up all their options before drawing, but I would say that there was only one other option the friend did not use up prior to drawing, and that was to simply turn and run away hoping that he was faster and had better endurance than his assailants. Though, where would you run to in an empty parking lot? Not the safty of the broken down car.
generallobster is offline  
Old July 16, 2005, 12:57 AM   #98
D.S. Brown
Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2004
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 57
Once again let's throw the responsibility of this situation where it belongs, square in the laps of the two dirtbags that threatened and intimidated this man to the point where he had to draw a weapon to defend himself.

LET ME BE CLEAR! IF THEY HAD SIMPLY MINDED THEIR OWN BUSINESS AND LET THE PERSON IN QUESTION MAKE HIS PHONE CALL UNTHREATENED AND UNMOLESTED THIS DISCUSSION WOULD HAVE BEEN MOOT!

Our man did everything right! I am tired of the lack of accountability for the scum who initiated this encounter. Why aren't they being held to the same standards. Shouldn't they have known that the pursuit of this criminal endeavour might have some unintended consequences i.e. the victim might be armed and thus not quite so compliant, that maybe they might have ended up tagged on the toe dead. I'll say this much they did execute their duty to retreat prudently when they found themselves at a gun fight without a gun(s).

Dave
__________________
Glock 23 .40 S&W DDT*** 9,500+ rounds
Glock 27 .40 S&W ELL*** 4,800+ rounds
Glock 35 .40 S&W GAD*** 3,400+ rounds
Glock 23 .40 S&W CLU*** 2,200+ rounds
D.S. Brown is offline  
Old July 16, 2005, 01:17 AM   #99
payne
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 26, 2005
Location: SE US
Posts: 519
Let me help ya'll out with a few more details. This man was my sunday school teacher from a few years ago when I was in high school. He's middle aged and kindly round. Bad knees too. These thugs were bout my age, early twenties he said. He was at the pay phone and didn't see them till he was already at the phone. Said, "yeah right" cause he thought they were kidding. Situation happened in Memphis, TN on his way home to Alabama. He does have family; a wife and a son a year older than me.

Couger, I understand what you are saying. But, retreat for this man wouldn't be outrunning these guys. they would easily catch and beat the ever loving crap outta him. I figure that's what they probably woulda done.

My friend is a nice guy and would be hard pressed to pull the trigger, but Im sure he woulda if he had to.
__________________
If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles. - Sun Tzu
payne is offline  
Old July 16, 2005, 01:20 AM   #100
Half-Price Assassin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2005
Location: Oh
Posts: 602
I hate the ANTI-Gun crowd, most of them live in nice safe (not to mention VERY expensive parts of town, gated communities, with own private security), so its no wonder they dont feel the need to carry a firearm. but for most, "real", americans who have to go out into the real world, where we might meet real P.O.S. people that would love to do us harm, we carry a firearm. your friend, thank God he is safe and wasnt harmed, or even killed, did the right thing. i was watching a show on t.v. about police training drills, where they said 19 steps was the magic number you need to keep between you and a threat. at that distance a badguy with a knife can rush you, and stab you before you can grab your gun, draw your firearm, and aim your weapon. they showed how with new recuits how a guy just standing there acting calm and peaceful one second, can run at the officer and stab him mulitiple times before the officer can pull his gun, and point it on the, once calm and peaceful badguy. if you dont believe it, try it with your friend, get a dummy gun, and a rubber knife, and have your friend stand 19 steps away, and run at you, without you knowing, and see if you can draw and get a shot off in time.

its too bad we live in a country, were the Bad guys, can use the court system to, for a second time in some cases, destroy the lives of good, and honest americans. you can thank the Anti-gun people for that.
__________________
Bernhard Goetz
Real American Hero

HK Marketing Department's new slogan "HK. Because you suck. And we HATE you"
Half-Price Assassin is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07392 seconds with 8 queries