December 5, 2011, 11:01 AM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
The whole point of owning a rimfire is to shoot it a LOT, and the Ruger will last a lifetime, which is more thatn you can say for most of the potmetal guns out there. |
|
December 5, 2011, 11:43 AM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
Umarex Sportwaffen GmbH & Co. KG is Walther's parent company. In that respect, all Walthers are made by Umarex to some degree. Postwar-designed Walther centerfire pistols, including the P99, PPQ, and PPS, are built at the original Walther plant in Ulm. (Well, it's only kinda the original plant. The first Walther plant in Zella-Mehlis was destroyed during a little disagreement various European countries had between 1939 and 1945. ) Ulm-produced pistols bear an antler proofmark. Umarex produces post-buyout rimfire pistols, including the P22, SP22, and the "Colt" AR replica, at a separate plant in Köln (aka Koeln / Cologne). It's my understanding that this plant was originally built to produce airguns under the Umarex badge. Köln-produced pistols bear a crown proofmark. Some Walther purists view the Köln guns as inferior-quality counterfeits that bring shame to the vaunted Walther name. That's why you routinely see people saying that the P22 and SP22 are "not real Walthers". OTOH many shooters don't really care as long as the guns shoot OK. Just to introduce a little more confusion, yes, Walther products are distributed in the USA by S&W, which also builds all US-market PPK and PPK/S variants at their plant in Houlton, ME to skirt the 68 GCA import regulations.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
December 5, 2011, 12:16 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,126
|
Ruger.
|
December 5, 2011, 12:52 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
It has: - A broken safety - A broken extractor - A broken firing pin spring. The gun was not abused in any way shape or form, these parts all just failed on a gun with a somewhat low round count. The good news is that - the gun still functions. Since it's a range only gun & one that only I shoot, the lack of a working safety isn't an issue. I also have a Ruger .22/45 with over 150,000 rounds through it. That gun is still 100% and 100% original. Moral? Everything, even a Ruger can and will break. Rugers are very robust however & should last a long time. Also - over engineered? Not at all. Ruger uses cast metal and stamped steel. The feed ramp on the Mark II is a rough slice of the chamber sort of pressed out of the surrounding metal as some sort of after thought. I've lost track of the number of Mark II's I've seen that refuse to feed hollow points because the nose digs into the bottom of the feed ramp. IMNSHO - Ruger's are minimally engineered. Over built probably, but, they are far from over engineered. Last edited by Hal; December 5, 2011 at 12:59 PM. |
|
December 5, 2011, 12:56 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2005
Location: A big city with far too many cars and people.
Posts: 932
|
Another RUGER vote.
__________________
No one reads or cares what is written in ones signature box. So I'm not writing anything worth reading or remembering. |
December 5, 2011, 02:36 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
The Ulm-manufactured guns (P99, PPQ, PPS, various Olympic target guns) are light years ahead of the Umarex-produced potmetal guns (P22, PK380, fake Colts, fake H&Ks, etc.) in terms of quality, durability, reliability, etc. The Ulm pistols are among the best in the world. The Umarex pistols are what the are - inferior potmetal guns that are Umarex's attempt to cash in on the Walther name. |
|
December 5, 2011, 02:44 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
The Mark III has an ever-so-slightly larger feed ramp. My Mark III has never has a failure to feed HP ammo. One of several improvements from the Mark II to Mark III that folks tend to forget about when complaining about all the lawyer-junk on the Mark III. |
|
December 5, 2011, 08:24 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 187
|
Ruger Mark III. Very happy with mine (target).
I wish I'd kept track of the rounds, about 4000 in a year, maybe more. |
December 6, 2011, 09:31 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2010
Location: East Tn. for 56 years
Posts: 540
|
HAL - You are absolutely correct, even the best of pistols can and do break. I'm glad to read your Ruger, even with broken parts, stills functions. So does this mean you would rather shoot a broken Ruger than load a perfectly good ________? Kinda sounds like some of the bumper stickers you see on the road; "I would rather push my _______ than drive a ______." Gotta try to keep some humor in this. I own 3 MKII's and all have been flawless, is that to say the next time I shoot one of them it will not break, not at all. But if someone asks me what .22 I would recommend they buy, depending on use and price - Buy a Ruger. Overall best bang for the buck. (no pun intended)By the way, you failed to address the OP issue; What .22 rimfire would you recommend, if any?
__________________
If something is worth doing well, it is worth failing at to get there. |
December 6, 2011, 10:28 AM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 84
|
Ruger MK ll
The Ruger MK ll/lll is more accurate than me. As far as tearing it down for cleaning, it is a pain so I havn't done it in years. Just a spray of carb cleaner every so often and a little lube. Have not had it fail to fire since I bought the gun many thousand of rounds ago.
|
December 6, 2011, 01:40 PM | #36 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
I'm really curious how many parts of the thing can break before it stops. I shot a bunch one day @ the range w/it and only found out when I got it home and stripped it to clean it that the firing pin spring had broken into two pieces. I have no idea at what point it broke, but, it didn't bother the gun at all. I cleaned it up, put the two pieces back in and took it out again. A few times later,again, when I got it home and stripped for cleaning, that the extractor was broken and the "hook" was gone. Same thing, I cleaned it & on the next few trips to the range, I packed it along and fired it some. No problems at all - it ran perfect. Amazing! Quote:
I'm very partial to a Ruger .22/45 and I dearly love my wife's Buckmark Micro - when I can pry her hands off it . I like my other two Buckmarks as well - the Camper and the really beautifuly finished Plus. The only word to describe the trigger on my High Standards is - magic. You touch the trigger & by magic a hole appears downrange exactly where it's supposed to be. My (broken) Mark II is ok. It's a slabside model. I took some wet/dry up to 1600 grit to the slabs and brought them up to a mirror finish. I think it looks sharp in contrast to the brushed satin on the rest of the gun. I believe Ruger or Browning both make a good gun for casual use. |
||
December 6, 2011, 04:45 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2010
Location: East Tn. for 56 years
Posts: 540
|
HAL - I have never shot a High Standard but I hear more and more how nice of a pistol they are. About 2-3 months ago I had the opportunity to buy an older Trophy High Standard; I believe that's the correct model. Anyway, it was perfect and in the correct box - the guy was asking in the $700 range. Is that reasonable? If so, I can probably get my hands on it. I am in no way a competition shooter nor will I ever be, however, I do enjoy shooting different pistols. With the cost of ammo these days the .22 rimfire is really all a person needs as far as range shooting. Yes it's fun to shoot a 9mm or
.45 but if you don't reload yourself it can be cost prohibitive. With that said, I'm certainly not opposed to letting go of larger caliber pistol to fund the purchase of a something that is more economical to shoot. Not to mention a very nice piece. Thanks.
__________________
If something is worth doing well, it is worth failing at to get there. |
December 6, 2011, 07:42 PM | #38 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,469
|
Quote:
That said, I don't think Umarex is trying to fool anyone. Their advertising doesn't try to make you think the frames and slides are ordnance steel. Umarex is an airgun maker that's expanding into recreational firearms. Obviously, a .22 plinker doesn't NEED an ordnance steel frame or slide ... so they don't spend the money to provide one. I don't have a problem with that. |
|
December 6, 2011, 08:19 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Southern MI
Posts: 250
|
Did a LOT of research on this when I was looking to buy a .22 pistol. Basically, it boils down to the following:
Tier 1: S&W 41 But you're looking at something like double the price of the other guns, maybe more (Haven't checked the price in years). Tier 1.5: Ruger II, III <---> Browning Buckmarks Extremely aggressively priced with rave reviews all around. Browning probably inches out the Ruger (mostly due to disassembly/reassembly) unless you're willing (eager?) to tinker and upgrade the Rugers (Which you can do far more of). Ergonomics on the guns are dramatically different, so that could be a factor as well. Tier 2: P22, S&W 22a, Neos, Mosquito Had fun plinking with all three, but these aren't the guns you see in competition shooting. I picked the Ruger Mark III and couldn't be happier with it. I'll note that I went from liking the gun to LOVING the gun after putting the Volquartsen trigger kit into it. The price of the trigger kit in the Bull Barrel model was competitive with the price of the mid-range Bucks. Other stuff exists, but it's all pretty challenging to get a hold of due to being out of production. |
December 6, 2011, 09:01 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
|
|
December 7, 2011, 01:59 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Arkansas-Oklahoma Line
Posts: 336
|
Ruger MKIII. My buddy talked me into shooting it with him. I put my S&W down and plinked with his. It has a red dot scope on it. After a couple saturdays shooting, I am plinking golf balls at 30 yards. It taught me to hold the pistol correctly and squeeze the trigger better. For target shooting, the Ruger would be my choice. Just my $.02.
__________________
Teach a kid to respect wildlife, then teach a kid to hunt and fish. |
December 7, 2011, 02:59 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,679
|
RUGER MKII,Great little gun.
|
December 7, 2011, 07:19 AM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2011
Posts: 1,405
|
The Beretta 87 Target is on my list but they usually run around 750 or more.
__________________
Colt M1911, AR-15 | S&W Model 19, Model 27| SIG P238 | Berreta 85B Cheetah | Ruger Blackhawk .357MAG, Bearcat "Shopkeeper" .22LR| Remington Marine Magnum SP 12GA., Model 700 SPS .223 |
December 7, 2011, 07:29 AM | #44 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
It all depends on when/where it was made & the actual condition. I'd definatly take some time to visit a few of the High Standard forums and look over what similar ones are going for on the online auctions/sales boards. The real acid test though will be to shoot it if you get the chance. A High Standard is the type of gun that a hundred or two in either direction make very little difference once you've shot one. |
|
December 7, 2011, 08:40 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 1, 2011
Location: LoneStar State
Posts: 156
|
Well, y'all convinced me! Picked up a Ruger 22/45 yesterday (Merry Christmas to me!) and can't wait to blow through a bunch of cheap bullets this weekend. I've been considering this for awhile....for a good plinker and one I can take along on camping and hiking trips.
Thanks for all the comments and insight! |
December 7, 2011, 09:08 AM | #46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
But on the whole, it a relatively easy task if you just take your time. No special tools are needed other than a screwdriver to remove the grips and a small eyeglasses screwdriver (or something similar) to depress the slide stop spring and a few other parts. Here is an excellent guide showing how to completly strip down and reassemble a Mark III: http://www.guntalk-online.com/detailstrip.htm |
|
December 7, 2011, 05:05 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2008
Location: Southern MI
Posts: 250
|
Like Fish said, it's pretty easy if you're mechanically inclined. I put it in the 2nd time I took apart the Ruger, which also happened to be the 2nd time I'd taken apart ANY gun.
The videos/guides online make it pretty idiot proof. The only nasty bits are making sure the sear spring is oriented correctly (just look at pics) and a couple of small parts (Like the safety ball). It's easier than, say, rebuilding a carbuerator, harder than putting a new part into the computer. Shoot it stock a few times and then buy yourself the Volquartsen kit - the happiest $60 you'll ever spend. Oh, and get the VQ extractor while you're at it. You'll need it sooner or later. |
December 8, 2011, 10:48 AM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 187
|
Thanks for the info guys.
|
December 8, 2011, 11:21 AM | #49 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
|
Quote:
Basically, Umarex's responce when asked where the P22 is made is "Made in Germany by Walther." However, several forum members there have been to Walther's Ulm factory and can confirm that the P22 is not manufactured there. Furthermore, the proofmarks on P22s verify that they are proofed in Cologne, not too far from the Umarex factory in Arnsberg. All Ulm-manufactured Walther pistols are proofed in Ulm and carry the "staghorn" proofmark. This is only one example - Umarex produces an entire line of H&K rimfires that have "Manufactured by Carl Walther/Ulm" printed on them that are not manufactured in Ulm. The proofmarks bear this out as well. Now technically, since Umarex is the parent company of Walther, they can do all of this legally. But I for one still find it rather deceptive, since the Walther name indicates a level of quality far above what one actually receives from the potmetal P22. Of course, every industry does this - it's called "brand engineering." By definition, it means "cashing in" on an established name. Quote:
Please don't take this the wrong way. I know that many folks like the look and feel of the P22, and have a lot of fun with them. But for the price, there are more durable, reliable, and accurate guns out there. And I am certainly not a Walther-hater. I own a 9mm P99AS (the gun the P22 copies the looks of) and it is by far the most reliable and high-quality pistol I've ever owned. I think that is why the stories about the Umarex P22 aggravate me so much. Unfortunately, or many people, the P22 will be their first exposure to this great line of products, and it's low quality will no doubt cause many folks to tune out on the truly great pistols beling produced by Walther at Ulm. Last edited by Fishbed77; December 8, 2011 at 11:45 AM. |
||
December 8, 2011, 12:10 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Code:
Did a LOT of research on this when I was looking to buy a .22 pistol. Basically, it boils down to the following: Tier 1: S&W 41 Get a used one rather than a new one (they are better quality and more affordable). I have used mine for hunting, target shooting and it was my self defense gun for many years on trips (easier to conceal than my larger revolvers and could dissemble it and carry it in several locations on my person and in bagage so no one would get a complete gun). for you list it is the single choice that meets all of them. Others are too much and cost, or are far lesser and not nearly as capable or good. Its accurate, trigger is amazing, its reliable and has terrific adjustable iron sights (with a newer barrel you can add a rail for a dot or laser) |
Tags |
.22 , competition , pistol , suggestion , target |
|
|