The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 2, 2016, 07:32 PM   #26
Llama Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2016
Posts: 337
.308, 7mm-08, .270, .30-06 and 7mm Mag are the do-it-all Western US calibers. There's very little difference in capability between them.
  • .270 shoots a little flatter
  • .270 has a bit more trouble with elk and moose due to low sectional density bullets and smaller diameter
  • .30-06 and 7mm Mag recoil a more
  • .30-06 can begin to push into great bear territory, but is not ideal for that
  • The 7mms have higher BCs and thus retian energy better than the .30s or .270

Anything you pick out of that list is going to be fine. Personally I have a .308, a 7mm-08, and a 7mm mag and find them largely interchangeable.
Llama Bob is offline  
Old February 2, 2016, 07:39 PM   #27
Llama Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2016
Posts: 337
Quote:
...it is plenty capable of taking elk which I would not trust the .243 or 7mm-08 to do that cleanly.
Nonsense. The 7mm 160 Accubond and 175 Partition are perfectly well suited to elk and the 7mm-08 can drive them at suitable velocities out to about 350y depending on elevation. If you don't like the round that's your business, but objectively it's 100% suited to the task of shooting elk.

The .243 is in fact too light however. 6.5mm caliber is probably the absolute minimum.
Llama Bob is offline  
Old February 4, 2016, 10:26 AM   #28
Photon Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2015
Posts: 291
When I went deer hunting I used a shotgun as shotguns are the only type of firearm allowed for hunting deer where I was hunting. A shotgun is a good choice for deer hunting but if you want a deer rifle I would recommend a .30 06 which is good for hunting any of the large, not as dangerous game.
Photon Guy is offline  
Old February 5, 2016, 01:54 PM   #29
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
All are fine and you would be hard pressed to see much difference real world.

To really muddy up your waters, the 30-06 is also a great choice. A little more recoil, a little more performance.

Bottom line, if you want a .308 there is no reason not to buy it.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Old February 5, 2016, 02:24 PM   #30
kilimanjaro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
You will have to hunt for 7mm-08 ammo in some places at some times, it's best to stick with .270, .308, or .30-06, for a newbie. In addition, if you don't like hunting some ways down the road, oddball calibers are harder to sell.

The .270 is a bit light for elk, if you can't keep your range under 150 yards with it, might upgun to .308 or .30-06. Use a heavy bullet with the .270 for elk.

I hate to say this, but gun shop clerks sometimes like to push stale merchandise on the newbies, or just do them favors, in their thinking. The .308 is an excellent choice and there is no reason at all to get something else.
kilimanjaro is offline  
Old February 8, 2016, 01:16 AM   #31
samsmix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2006
Location: Montana (Montucky?)
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
The .270 is a bit light for elk, if you can't keep your range under 150 yards with it, might upgun to .308 or .30-06. Use a heavy bullet with the .270 for elk.
There is nothing about the .270 with a 150gr bullet that would suggest that sort of limitation, yardage wise. Certainly going to a .308 IS NOT up-gunning from a .270. The .30-06 might be, IF we were talking about the great bears, but on deer and elk please tell me what shot you would take with a .308 or a .30-06, that you would pass up with a .270?

The .270 IS a .27-06 after all. (I know, I know: .27-03, but...)
__________________
You'll probably never NEED a gun. I hope you never do. But IF you do, you will need it worse than anything you've ever needed in your life.

IF we're not supposed to eat animals,
howcome God made 'em outta meat?
samsmix is offline  
Old February 8, 2016, 10:21 PM   #32
Llama Bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2016
Posts: 337
Quote:
Certainly going to a .308 IS NOT up-gunning from a .270.
For bigger game it probably is. I'd take a 180gr. .308 paritition over a 150gr. .277 partition for elk or moose any day.

It's also worth noting that 150gr .277 bullets are only marginally stable in many guns. With a 1-10" twist barrel, 180gr .308 is comfortably stable at all elevations and temperatures.
Llama Bob is offline  
Old February 9, 2016, 07:24 AM   #33
samsmix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2006
Location: Montana (Montucky?)
Posts: 1,273
I take your point Llama Bob, and I....sort of agree, but by such a thin margin that I'd hate to live on the difference. I just don't see what one is going to do that the other does not. It is a 6 of one, half a dozen of the other type situation, so I'll take the flatter shooting gun...but then I hunt a lot of prairie too.
__________________
You'll probably never NEED a gun. I hope you never do. But IF you do, you will need it worse than anything you've ever needed in your life.

IF we're not supposed to eat animals,
howcome God made 'em outta meat?
samsmix is offline  
Old February 9, 2016, 11:06 AM   #34
old roper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
I have very little experience with 308 and I don't own one. I don't think 308 is step up using 180gr partition compared to the 270 and the 160gr partition that Nosler been making. That bullet been in every Nosler reloading manual starting with #1.

I use the 180gr partition in my 30-06. My 270 I have no problems with getting Stability Factor of 1.5 or greater with either 150gr Partition or 160gr Partition.

There are reason why 270 been around long time and I'm not taking anything away from 308.
__________________
Semper Fi
Vietnam 1965
VFW Life member
NRA Life Member
old roper is offline  
Old February 10, 2016, 07:35 PM   #35
Geo_Erudite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2013
Location: SE WI
Posts: 158
I would choose .260 Remington, 6.5 Creedmoor, 6.5x55 or 6.5-.284 Norma. If you need a magnum, .264 Winchester Magnum. But a lot of people would say the .264 caliber is too small for elk. If that's your belief, then go with a .280 Remington.

Last edited by Geo_Erudite; February 10, 2016 at 07:42 PM.
Geo_Erudite is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04600 seconds with 10 queries