|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 9, 2009, 09:23 PM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,466
|
Letter 2 Editor, re: AK-47 Saves Life, Captures Murderer
I just e-mailed this to the Atlanta Journal & Constitution. I don't figure it'll ever get published, but I would appreciate my fellow TFL members' critiques:
Quote:
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own craven apathy; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the valor of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) |
|
May 9, 2009, 09:36 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Eastern, TN
Posts: 1,236
|
Good on ya' Gary, This is a factually stated and well expressed letter, I had thought to do the same when I read the story on the other thread but, I could not hope to do better than this.
Kudos, Dan
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska - |
May 9, 2009, 09:45 PM | #3 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,660
|
Excellent!
It would be nice if the editors to published it. Sometimes they do, just to stir-up controversy. Let's hope this is one of those times. |
May 10, 2009, 08:37 AM | #4 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Good letter. It picks a single point and stays focused while being brief and informative.
I'm torn between whether you should point out that the semi-automatic rifle used was technically an AK47. On the one hand, it adds a separate argument that might make the letter longer and less easily understood. On the other hand, there is already a lot of confusion among non-shooters between a semi-auto AK-action and an actual AK. Maybe the "semi-automatic copy of the AK47"? Don't know... ideally, the way to do it would be to have your letter as is and then have somebody else write a separate short letter explaining the difference between an AK47 and a semi-auto copy of it. Anybody want to write the Atlanta Journal-Constitution with me? That is one of the great things about Internet news discussion forums. If every gun owner just comes in and hits one single point of the many issues in a brief, concise manner, it is pretty convincing. |
May 10, 2009, 08:58 AM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,769
|
Excellent.
Instead of "medium powered", I would have called those rounds as "HIGH POWERED" as that is how the media would surely have described them. Let us know if you get a response... |
May 10, 2009, 01:05 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,466
|
I appreciate the compliments! I am rather pleased with how the letter just sort of fell together, without requiring a lot of wordsmithing on my part.
Bartholomew, I gave quite a little thought to the "assault rifle / assault weapon" issue. Notice I put "assault weapon" in quotes, indicating that is otherpeoplespeak. As to the difference between a real military AK-47 and one of the castrated versions now routinely sold, I didn't want to get caught up in the side issue of full-auto vs. semi-auto versions. When you look at the ads in Shotgun News and other gun magazines, you'll see the semis called "AK-47." We really can't blame the news media for labeling them that also. So be it. Creature, great suggestion about using "High-Powered" with quotes around it. If I'd have thought of it, I would have done that, though at the risk of having the sarcasm whisk right over the heads of 99.9% of the readers. The other risk, of course, is that the editor would have simply edited out the quotation marks, as the sarcasm whisked right over his head, too. I wanted to point out that the 7.62X39mm cartridge is not very high powered, although technically it is a "High-Powered Rifle" cartridge. In any event, "High Powered" would have done quite nicely. Side Issue: Shouldn't we have some intermediate cartridge category between rimfire and "High-Powered Rifle" It is ludicrous to talk of the .22 Hornet or even the .223 Remington as a "High-Powered Rifle Cartridge" in the same vein as the .30-06 or .300 Win Mag. In point of fact, the only centerfire rifle cartridge I've never heard referred to as "High-Powered" is the .30 Carbine. Again, thanks for the compliments, folks.
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own craven apathy; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the valor of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) |
May 10, 2009, 01:15 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 811
|
I also say 'excellent!'. I also admire Mr. Pugh in that he had enough self control to not permanently end Mr. Redding's life.
__________________
sailing ... A way to spend lots of money and go real S L O W |
May 11, 2009, 03:47 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 4, 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 95
|
Is this the best argument you got for the use of AK's?
believe me I have no opinion on AK's Auto or not, I'd like to shoot one in a range one day but, I mean come on I have several counter points here. 1. A rifle sucks in an apartment for SD 2. it was his primary SD gun because if his HandGun was it reach I'd bet he would grab it instead 3. he "only" shot him in the arm and sholder because it was probably dark and his only intention was to stop the threat like it should be. Boy, some of yall sure in the hell talk big. let me guess, if it was you you would have done a double tap to the chest and a shot to the head, RIGHT? I mean don't get me wrong I believe in SD/HD just as you all do, but I think the story about the riots in L.A and the guy standing on the rooftop to keep 15/20 crazy riot people from distroying his house was more plausable.
__________________
Gabe Vega I just started a blog about my experiences being a blind gun owner and a target shooter, check it out at http://theblindmansbluff.blogspot.com |
May 11, 2009, 06:09 AM | #9 | |
Junior member
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,769
|
Quote:
|
|
May 11, 2009, 06:31 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,716
|
Quote:
Just like guns don't kill people, they don't save lives and capture people either. In this case, I don't see where the AK-47 had anything to do directly with Redding's capture. Redding left the scene and wasn't captured for 3 months. So the 4 month delay is because charges have finally been filed? http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/pri...aying0509.html It may be a shame that Pugh's shots weren't more lethal as apparently he has gone into hiding after being attacked again, apparently in retribution for the January 7, shooting. Redding spend the next three months out on the street and apparently rallied his friends to his cause.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|