The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 16, 2011, 06:03 PM   #1
ctjoe
Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 39
Recipes for 357 mag?

My friend said he would help me reload my 357 cases. I shoot at range so I am looking for a mild 357 shot nothing HOT. I would rather not shoot the 38 round as the 357 is better for accuracy. Any Recipes?
ctjoe is offline  
Old January 16, 2011, 07:11 PM   #2
700cdl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2010
Posts: 216
I shoot and load a lot of .357 mag. and have discovered a load that contradicted my expectations, and that of my Son's who shoot a bunch of my hand loads too. My high velocity load which is 110 gr. and 125 grain jacked bullets loaded with H110 or 296, are very uncomfartable to shoot because of heavy recoil, so that is certainly not the load of choice for you. But while trying to work up another high velocity load, which is what I prefer to shoot, I desiced on a 158 gr. jacketed bullet. I used the same powders,
H110 and 296, and loaded up at the maximum charge of 16.4 grains of 296. I was expecting a much heavier recoil, especially since they chronographed at nearly 1300 fps., This load was so nice I've decided to make it my self defense load. I don't know what gun you are shooting, but I fired these out of S&W model 66-5 and a Taurus model 608. The little S&W is a snub nosed and ususally leaves me with a sore wrist with full magnum loads, but these loads didn't even make it necessary to use a two hand hold. Try those 158s with 296 or H110 , I think you'll like them. I used Hornady XTPs.
Here is some data:
W-296 - 14.3 grains to 16.4 grains
H110 - 14.1 grains to 17.0 grains
DO NOT REDUCE THESE POWDER CHARGES BELOW THE MINIMUM OR PRESSURES INCREASE BEYOND A SAFE RANGE!
700cdl is offline  
Old January 16, 2011, 07:11 PM   #3
AlaskaMike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
Most of what you're looking for can be found in loading manuals. Midrange .357 mag loads are extremely common.

My personal favorite midrange .357 load uses a 158 grain SWC over 231 powder for about 900 fps velocity out of my 4" S&W model 28.
AlaskaMike is offline  
Old January 16, 2011, 07:17 PM   #4
AlaskaMike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
700cdl, where did you get that load data? The reason I ask is that the minimum charge weights you cite are more than 12% less than the max. Virtually all manuals warn not to decrease charges more than 3, 5, or 10%, depending on the particular manual when using H110/W296.

It's also worth pointing out that the original poster is interested in mild loads, so H110/W296 isn't a good powder for consideration. It's a powder that's only appropriate for full-house magnum loads.
AlaskaMike is offline  
Old January 16, 2011, 07:41 PM   #5
Doodlebugger45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2009
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,717
I have found several very mild .357 loads. The only one I remember off the top of my head used 4.6 gr of W231 with a 158 gr cast bullet. Very accurate and no leading from my Blackhawk. For more power, I use a 158 gr JHP with 16.0 gr of W-296 or H-110. Also very accurate but recoil is not severe with a larger revolver.

I have had good luck with True Blue as well but I can't remember the weight right now.
Doodlebugger45 is offline  
Old January 16, 2011, 08:35 PM   #6
mnhntr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 9, 2008
Posts: 972
for mild 357s I like Hodgdons Tightgroup
mnhntr is offline  
Old January 16, 2011, 08:42 PM   #7
zippy13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
If you want a light recoiling paper puncher, consider a 148-gr lead WC over 2.8-gr of Bullseye. Fun to shoot and inexpensive to reload.
zippy13 is offline  
Old January 17, 2011, 09:57 PM   #8
jhansman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2007
Posts: 680
My favorite .357 mag load is 5 gr. of Titegroup under a 158gr. LSWC. Very accurate in my GP100 and I can shoot it all day.
__________________
Blessed is the man who has nothing to say, and cannot be compelled to say it.
jhansman is offline  
Old January 18, 2011, 04:29 AM   #9
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I have a newer 357 mag with rough chambers, so I have to load it wimpy.
158 gr JHP 6 gr W231 and that is about all it will do and extract nicely.
Clark is offline  
Old January 18, 2011, 06:13 AM   #10
spacecoast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
Mine is 5.4 gr. of Titegroup under a 158 gr. plated bullet, very comfortable from a 6" 686.

5.3 gr. of Unique under a 158 LSWC is a good .38 spc. +P load, should work quite well in the .357 as well as a mild load.

Last edited by spacecoast; January 18, 2011 at 09:15 PM.
spacecoast is offline  
Old January 18, 2011, 11:01 AM   #11
overkill0084
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2010
Location: Northern, UT
Posts: 1,162
The .38 spec vs. .357 accuracy difference is mostly theoretical, IMHO. I prefer .357 based loads simply because I don't need to deal with the carbon ring that builds up.
I found an extremely accurate load for my Colt recently:
6.6 of Accurate#5 pushing a 158 gr LSWC, CCI 500, Winchester .357 brass. This is too hot for .38 but super mild for .357.

Lee has a few good ones in the .38 +P section of their manual. Worth a look.
__________________
Cheers,
Greg
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child – miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.” — P.J. O’Rourke

Last edited by overkill0084; January 18, 2011 at 11:09 AM.
overkill0084 is offline  
Old January 18, 2011, 11:26 AM   #12
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
What powders do you have?

Try any 158 grain bullet (jacketed or cast doesn't matter) or 148 grain DEWC with about 4.0 grains of Red Dot.

Or look up ".38 Special +P" or .38 Super Auto load data for whatever components you have, and load that in .357 brass instead of .38
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old January 18, 2011, 06:59 PM   #13
crowbeaner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,943
If you need a good reliable accurate midrange load, try 11.0 of 2400 under a 158 Speer swaged lead bullet. You can shoot hardcast as well with the same load. Standard primers, and a good firm roll crimp to make it all burn. I shot a LOT of 150 hardcast over 9.0 of 4756 for years, but IMR has detuned their data since then. Make sure the cast bullets are sized to .358" to seal the chambers. There are many good loads under the Hodgdon site, you just have to try them and see what your particular gun likes. That's the beauty of handloading.
__________________
If you want your children to follow in your footsteps, be careful where you walk.
Beware the man that only owns one gun; he probably knows how to use it.
I just hope my ship comes in before my dock rots.
crowbeaner is offline  
Old January 18, 2011, 10:37 PM   #14
GP100man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2007
Location: Tabor City , NC.
Posts: 1,969
Just be aware of the powders that will work the best for your application will not fill the case & many have room for alot more powder , Titegroup is 1 that was mentioned ,I use CLAYS alot it`s another & 4.0 grs. of RD is not much either!! But all these are excellent midrange powders for the 357.

I load in batches , meaning I size all the cases then move on to the next step wth all the cases & when I charge em all I look under good lite with em in a loading block to see the powder levels to see if they all look the same & when satisfied seat bullets .

This simple step has kept me out of trouble a few times , mainly powder hanging in the dispenser , & gives me peace-of-mind !

You & your friend enjoy yourselves & stay focused on the task at hand , wish I had someone to take me under there wing when I started this madness!!!
__________________
GP100man
GP100man is offline  
Old January 18, 2011, 10:50 PM   #15
GURU1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 22, 2010
Location: SEALY, THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS
Posts: 501
.357 eazy shooting loads

My favorite do-anything recipe since 1975. Comfortable, accurate, & cheap to shoot: 158 hard cast lead swc---6.0 unique---win sp primer
GURU1911 is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 01:09 AM   #16
700cdl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2010
Posts: 216
Hello there AlaskaMike,
That data is Hornady data out of the One Book/ One Caliber manual which is consistent with other sources as well. Speer data is actually reduced more than that which does concern me. I noticed that in the most recent data from Speer, they increased the minimum charge and max charge with those powders. I've been loading with those for many years and have always stayed away from minimum load data. And regarding my reason for posting that data in the first place, is it was so nice to shoot with very low recoil. Not so with the 125 grain bullet or the 110 grain bullet using those powders. And yes, he did ask for middle of the road loads, and I did reiterate the fact that this powder isn't typical of that, but the particular load with 158 JHP felt nice to shoot.
700cdl is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 06:32 AM   #17
spacecoast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
Quote:
powders that will work the best for your application will not fill the case... when I charge em all I look under good lite with em in a loading block
GP100Man -

Good point, when I charge (with a dipper), I move the cases from the empty pile to the full pile (in rows) and that way it's pretty much impossible to double-charge a case. I tried the loading block but found it was easy to forget where I was. Even so, I still look at all of them with a light before moving on to seating the bullets.
spacecoast is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 11:51 AM   #18
AlaskaMike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
700cdl, re: H110/296 load data:
Quote:
That data is Hornady data out of the One Book/ One Caliber manual which is consistent with other sources as well. Speer data is actually reduced more than that which does concern me. I noticed that in the most recent data from Speer, they increased the minimum charge and max charge with those powders.
That's interesting. We hear virtually constant warnings urging us to not reduce from the max load by more than a tiny amount, and then we come across published data like this. I want to go over my own manuals now and see how many have a similar discrepancy. I guess it just goes to highlight the fact that manuals are guides, not gospel.
AlaskaMike is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 02:18 PM   #19
wild willy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2006
Posts: 404
700cdl those loads may be listed in One book/ One caliber but they are over max In the newer Hornady,Hodgon,and Speer manuals
wild willy is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 03:09 PM   #20
AlaskaMike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
Max loads for H110/296 have dropped noticeably across pretty much all the data sources. Lyman #48 actually has the max for certain 158 grain bullets being somewhere just above 17 grains if I remember correctly. I'm sure Lyman 49 has reduced that.

It's also understandable that Hornady data from the One Load booklets is different from the current Hornady manual--the data that companies sell the publisher of those booklets sell them older data, not their current stuff.
AlaskaMike is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 04:17 PM   #21
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Y'all realize he asked about light loads? 296 and H110 will not work for light loads.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 04:24 PM   #22
spacecoast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
Quote:
Y'all realize he asked about light loads?
Funny how a lot of .357 threads end up talking about H110 no matter how they started. JFTR, my first contribution on this thread was on topic.
spacecoast is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 06:10 PM   #23
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
If you are going to reload any ammo, get a reloading manual, or three. Look in your manual for a +P 38 Special load and use that in .357 Brass.
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
mikld is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 06:42 PM   #24
zxcvbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
Quote:
Funny how a lot of .357 threads end up talking about H110 no matter how they started. JFTR, my first contribution on this thread was on topic.
My middle-of-the-road .357 Magnum load is 8.0 grains of Herco with a 158 grain SWC, and I've started playing around with 7.0 grains of WSF with a 148 grain DEWC (not a light load by any means.)
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth
zxcvbob is offline  
Old January 19, 2011, 08:49 PM   #25
AlaskaMike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
zxcvbob wrote:
Quote:
Y'all realize he asked about light loads? 296 and H110 will not work for light loads.
You missed a post or two. 700cdl brought it up, I pointed out that the original poster was specifically looking for light loads, and then 700cdl mentioned his reasons for bringing up H110/296. The thread just sort of forked for a bit there, no biggie.
AlaskaMike is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.13427 seconds with 8 queries