|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 27, 2012, 01:37 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 99
|
Taurus M380 mini Revolver.
I had been interested in something like this, and I got a chance to check one out at a gun shop recently. I can't say I was too impressed. The quality wasn't the greatest, and the trigger pull was excessively hard.
I wish Charter Arms would do their own version of a .380acp revolver, similar to their 9mm and .40 semi-auto cartridge Pitbulls, but a true mini revolver with a lightweight aluminum frame and DAO. The quality and looks would be better as well. I think there is a need for something like this for us who only carry revolvers. There really isn't anything out there between one of those tiny NAA revolvers and the standard .38spl/.357 snubbie. Sometimes, I don't want to carry something even that big. I'm not against the concept of a .380acp revolver, I just didn't care much for the way Taurus did theirs. Still, I might get one if I come across a great deal. I have a feeling these unique and unusual revolvers won't find too many buyers, and may become collectible someday. |
November 27, 2012, 02:09 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Posts: 1,229
|
Chris... I also have looked at(well, here on the net)the M380, as I have older parents, and eventually the question will come up about hand strength, autoloaders vs revolvers, recoil tolerence, and all the things that goes with older people and guns. I would really like to have a revolver in a common caliber, but ballistically lighter than 38 special. Yes I know there were some 32 cal revolvers, but I want something you can get ammo for at any LGS. Unfortunately, the Taurus M380 just doesnt get the comments I want to hear. I dont like the fact its DAO, and from what I have read about the trigger pull, it seems that its not something Im going to be interested in.
I just bought a KelTec P32, have not fired it yet, but will be at the range tomorrow for a shake down of it. It might just be the answer Im looking for. Taurus could certainly make the M380 I want. I have the Taurus 905(9mm revolver)and recommend it when ever I can. A 380 revolver, Double Action, 6 shot, with a useable trigger, would be perfect. Offer the same in 32ACP, a 3 or 4" barrel, and either one would be a winner. |
November 27, 2012, 02:17 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,979
|
I still say that if a major manufacturer introduced a D/A revolver in .32 acp, and SCALED TO THE CARTRIDGE, it would sell like hotcakes (or Judges!)
|
November 27, 2012, 02:31 AM | #4 | |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
I've read that the trigger had to be that way in order for the hammer to hit the rimless cartridges hard enough to ignite, but something tells me it could be done differently, and better. I actually sent an email yesterday to Charter Arms marketing suggesting they come out with a .380acp version of their semi-auto cartridge "Pitbull" revolvers. But I haven't yet received a response. |
|
November 27, 2012, 04:05 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2010
Location: WesTex
Posts: 958
|
Charter Arms is a pretty small company (I think they employ about two dozen people). I really don't think they'll take the gamble of designing and producing a .380 revolver from the ground up.
I do wish the .32 family would see more of a comeback in smaller revolvers. A five (heck even four!) shot .327 magnum would be some good medicine in a small package.
__________________
"And I'm tellin' you son, well it ain't no fun, staring straight down a .44" -Lynyrd Skynyrd |
November 27, 2012, 07:37 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 12, 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,598
|
I am not a Taurus basher, first of all. But.....I bought one and it was not a very good example of very good quality control. Uneven finish, EXTREMELY heavy trigger, and the gun shot 8 inches low at 10 yards regardless of ammo. Just my two cents. And I like Taurus.
Last edited by mk70ss; November 27, 2012 at 07:55 AM. |
November 27, 2012, 08:59 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2010
Posts: 647
|
A friend let me shoot this thing (.25 ACP):
And guess what? I absolutely loved it. I someone made a modern equivalent in .32 ACP I'd jump at the opportunity to buy one. |
November 27, 2012, 12:22 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2012
Posts: 561
|
My wife was looking for a smaller and lighter than my old taurs 85 to carry and the m380 was on the list but after pulling the trigger on one that took care of that. We all ready have a TCP 380 in the family, daughter claimed mine as her CC and after my wife shot it she bought her self one of those .
|
November 27, 2012, 04:32 PM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
There has been one of those Taurus .380 ACP revolvers in the case at the local range shop for many months. No sign that anyone is remotely interested. It's one of those things that's an answer to a question nobody asked.
The fact that it uses moon clips doesn't help. Yes, I understand why, but I don't think people are willing to deal with the nuisance factor (or the expense) of the clips for the dubious benefit of firing an underpowered round in a revolver. The .380 ACP round makes more sense in places (countries) where "military" calibers (such as 9mm Parabellum) are not allowed for civilian ownership. Here in the U.S. we can buy and shoot 9mm, so guns the same size as 9mm but firing a less powerful round are very much a niche product. There's just no good reason for most people to buy one. And, yes ... Taurus generally has horrible trigger pulls on their revolvers. |
November 27, 2012, 04:51 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2012
Posts: 561
|
I have a 26 years old model 85SS that when new I radiused the edges of the trigger parts and polished them. And carried it for 20 years. Allways seem to have a very smooth trigger. When it was retired from CC I lightend the pull for my girls to shot and learn with a larger caliber handgun, I put a wolf RP hammer spring only and was suprised by the weight and ordered a trigger gauge. The DA pull is 4 1/2lb pull and SA is 2lb pull weight. Fires every handload or facrtory load ever tried. Must be the new revolvers have redeigned lawyer triggers inthem and are lost. This is the unly taurus revolver I have ever pulled the trigger on. My only other revolvers are DW revolvers.
|
November 27, 2012, 06:38 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Posts: 1,229
|
I have a new(2012) Taurus 905(9x19) revolver. It has a very nice trigger. I also have a new(2012) Taurus 94(22LR) and the trigger pull was RIDICULOUS. It must have been 50#. Seriously. I understand that rimfire revolvers need a strong mainspring, but out of my 7 other 22 revolvers, it was the worst, by a long ways. I installed a centerfire mainspring, and smoothed thing internally, and it is much improved. Reliability is still 100%. I would assume the M380 has the same spring weight that the rimfire versions come with. Its a shame, because it doesnt need to be that heavy. I have a Taurus POLY PT-22 and its a DAO 22 LR pistol. It has a smooth, reasonably light trigger, the M380 should also have a trigger like that. Its a shame because I would buy one. I might end up buying one anyways, and fiddling with the springs, as they have to be able to be lightened, without effecting reliability.
|
November 27, 2012, 08:11 PM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
|
|
November 27, 2012, 08:29 PM | #13 | ||||
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But I may still get one if and when they go for cheap on a close out deal or something. I'm not expecting these to be in their catalog for very long. Last edited by Chris9472; November 27, 2012 at 08:38 PM. |
||||
November 27, 2012, 09:24 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 22, 2011
Location: central Ohio
Posts: 135
|
For those of you screaming about a .32 revolver, most of you let one go by without even a nod. Taurus had an M327 revolver in 2" and canceled it last year.
This revolver would shoot 327 mag., 32 H & R., 32 Long and 32 acp. I have one that has never failed and has a good trigger. Wish I had another. |
November 27, 2012, 09:32 PM | #15 | |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
BTW... the M380 will most likely go the way of the M327 in a year or so. |
|
November 27, 2012, 09:54 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Posts: 448
|
Will 380ACP work in Charters 9mm?
|
November 27, 2012, 10:00 PM | #17 | |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
Too bad though that their 9mm revolver has no DAO verison. |
|
November 27, 2012, 10:11 PM | #18 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
Without question, the WORST trigger I have ever encountered on a new-in-box revolver. Even worse than my Taurus Model 94 ... and that's tough to be worse than. But it's a magnum, and built on the same Taurus frame as the Model 94 and the M380. It's not scaled down to be proportional to a lower-power .32 caliber round. |
|
November 28, 2012, 02:15 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
Last edited by weblance; November 28, 2012 at 02:27 AM. |
|
November 28, 2012, 02:32 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
|
Will be the only 380 I will ever buy again, looks neat I must say.
|
November 28, 2012, 09:17 AM | #21 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
|
|
November 28, 2012, 10:04 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
^^^ +1 Aquila.
Igousigloo: Although firing .32ACP in a .32 H&R Mag revolver isn't necessarily unsafe from a pressure standpoint, the undersized case rims can cause ejection problems. There is a very real risk of bending or breaking the ejector star if it tries to jump over one of the case rims and gets hung up. IMHO using the proper ammo is a better choice; .32 S&W Long isn't much more expensive than .32ACP if you mail order or shop around.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
November 28, 2012, 10:40 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2010
Posts: 647
|
For me, the crucial fact in a .32 ACP revolver would be its size. If the cylinder can accommodate 327 mag, I am not interested.
|
November 29, 2012, 05:57 AM | #24 | |
Member
Join Date: November 26, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 99
|
Quote:
Does S&W still make a 9mm revolver? I'd rather support my American arms manufacturers if possible. |
|
November 29, 2012, 09:15 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2011
Location: on the north side of DFW
Posts: 970
|
For those wishing for an "in-between" revolver, I would suggest finding a good old Smith and Wesson in .32 long. I see them very frequently at gun shows, and in gun shops. It seems there is not a huge demand for them, so the prices are usually surprisingly low.
I still plan to buy one, simply because they are so well made, but SMALL. The double action is the classic smooth-as-glass Smith and Wesson, and they hold 6 rounds. Since I reload, I would have a ball with it, but even non-reloaders can find ammo for it pretty readily. I think some of the russian/czech/import companies have loads for it. Worth looking at...
__________________
I always felt that if I got to the point where I thought it was time to bury my firearms, it was actually time to pick them up.. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|