|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 6, 2013, 08:45 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
The outrageous behavior continues...
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...zon-customers/
Apparently the FISA court has authorized DOJ/NSA to collect under subpoena every single call made to or from a Verizon customer (and, likely, any call transaction placed through any Verizon backbone) from April through June. That's right - every single call (and likely text) record for this period will be given to DoJ for their perusal. Whilst the ostensible justification is for anti-terrorist/national security efforts, it doesn't take the brainpower of Albert Einstein to see how the supercomputers at NSA can collate and cross-reference this information - for example, it could, should it so choose, identify any and all calls placed on Verizon lines to or from NRA, 2AF, GOA, etc. etc. and fairly easily develop an essentially comprehensive enemies list. Now, I'm sure the wonderfully honest, open and transparent regime would never do such a thing... |
June 6, 2013, 10:12 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,416
|
From what I've seen lately of branches of the federal government, I just don't trust them.
And from the article: "Everybody at the NSA knows that if they're listening in on American citizens without a very special order or a ruling from their lawyers, they're going to jail." Pffft. Yeah, right. |
June 6, 2013, 10:18 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
|
The outrageous behavior continues...
Makes you wonder how many things going on and what they're doing you don't hear about.
|
June 6, 2013, 11:48 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Just for the record, it's not the content of calls and texts that they're collecting, but the call logs: information about phone numbers, length of the calls, etc. This NYT article says that the information doesn't include names of subscribers; but if they have the phone numbers... so what?
From the article: The disclosure late Wednesday seemed likely to inspire further controversy over the scope of government surveillance. Kate Martin of the Center for National Security Studies, a civil liberties advocacy group, said that “absent some explanation I haven’t thought of, this looks like the largest assault on privacy since the N.S.A. wiretapped Americans in clear violation of the law” under the Bush administration. “On what possible basis has the government refused to tell us that it believes that the law authorizes this kind of request?” she said.No kidding.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. Last edited by Evan Thomas; June 6, 2013 at 11:57 AM. Reason: revision. |
June 6, 2013, 11:57 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 779
|
I don't worry they are doing such a thing.
I assume they are doing such a thing to eliminate political enemies. There is literally no other reason they would need to do this. The fear of Terrorism is far more dangerous than the actual concept itself.
__________________
I told the new me, "Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'" But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back." Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor |
June 6, 2013, 12:45 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 545
|
I suggest that we stop using the words tea, party, patriot, and a few others like those in phone conversations. Otherwise expect an IRS audit.
I am amazed at all the old sci-fy stuff that has come to fruition in these modern times. We can't beam people up yet but who knows when. But it's clear to me that there is one thing we need quickly, The cone of silence. I do not trust the government |
June 6, 2013, 01:42 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
This particular order was to Verizon Business Services; "only" records of calls from businesses' phones are required to be turned over. The legal justification for this is a section of the Patriot Act requiring businesses to turn over their own records on demand, i.e. with no warrant required.
The actual court order is available on the Guardian's website. What's not clear is how many other orders of this kind have been issued.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
June 6, 2013, 01:58 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2011
Location: Ohio-Kentucky - florida
Posts: 1,221
|
The outrageous behavior continues...
Quote:
|
|
June 6, 2013, 02:07 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
There are elected officials who are opposed to this kind of invasion of privacy, and it's up to us to let them know we support them in this, and to elect more who feel the same way.
From the New York Times: Following the comments by Ms. Feinstein and Mr. Chambliss, Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, issued a statement confirming that the program was the one that he and Senator Mark Udall, Democrat of Colorado, have been cryptically warning about for years each time the Patriot Act has come up for renewal. He said he hoped the disclosure would “force a real debate” about whether such “sweeping, dragnet surveillance” should be permitted or is necessary.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
June 6, 2013, 02:35 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 755
|
This is all in the name of Patriotism... That's why the Patriot Act allows this type of stuff...<sarcasm off>
We live in a sad time. Trust me, the smart phone is one of the newest tools they can use. I know all newer cell phones have GPS tracking and all that, but now with the abilities to read emails sent to or from a smart phone, big brother is watching... That is the main reason the phone tapping and no warrant phone records are so important to the government. While they are construed as emails, they are also in the phone company's records. My sister-in-law works for a local phone/cell service in my area, she was the first to tell me about the texts and emails being able to be retrieved by law enforcement agencies..
__________________
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 6, 2013, 06:21 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Do you know which congressmen/women voted for the "patriot act" and FISA?
Here is a listing of all current members of congress along with their votes on the so called "patriot act" and FISA: http://news.yahoo.com/heres-exactly-...164654883.html |
June 6, 2013, 06:41 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Thallub, thanks for posting that.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
June 6, 2013, 07:56 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 779
|
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013...iants-nsa-data
It get's worse. Basically anyone on or using the big tech giants is very likely monitored
__________________
I told the new me, "Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'" But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back." Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor |
June 6, 2013, 08:36 PM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2013
Posts: 1
|
Imposition
The imposition of my privacy is CRAP!! And not a darn thing I can do about it. Please don't tell me "You can vote them out of office".
|
June 6, 2013, 08:39 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Upper midwest
Posts: 5,631
|
Just to show how powerful so-called "metadata" is as an intelligence tool, here's an article from the ACLU on the role of this type of information in the sex scandal involving former CIA director David Petraeus. Here's the first paragraph:
When the CIA director cannot hide his activities online, what hope is there for the rest of us? In the unfolding sex scandal that has led to the resignation of David Petraeus, the FBI’s electronic surveillance and tracking of Petraeus and his mistress Paula Broadwell is more than a side show—it's a key component of the story. More importantly, there are enough interesting tidbits (some of which change by the hour, as new details are leaked), to make this story an excellent lesson on the government’s surveillance powers—as well as a reminder of the need to reform those powers.And these were two people who were trying not to leave tracks... it's chilling to read.
__________________
Never let anything mechanical know you're in a hurry. |
June 6, 2013, 09:59 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: May 9, 2013
Posts: 40
|
The Patriot Act was put in place by the Republican Government and here we are with the Democrats.
Has anyone noticed that the same tyrranical behaviour happens regardless of which party is in power? Why do you think that is? There is really only one party. It never changes. |
June 6, 2013, 10:36 PM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
As others have mentioned, this is proof that party loyalty gets us nowhere when it comes to civil liberties. You have to know your legislators' records, you have to vote intelligently, and you have to hold their feet to the fire.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
June 7, 2013, 05:24 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 38
|
The outrageous behavior continues...
http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013...iants-nsa-data
NSA taps in to systems of Google, Facebook, Apple and others, secret files reveal |
June 7, 2013, 08:44 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 755
|
I would worry. Our government(no matter which party nostrils it) has too much power. Each branch now basically answers only to itself... When the FBI,CIA,DHS,DEA..etc can do basically what they want with no repercussions we as a people are the ones who lose. Our freedoms are gone. When they do this in the name of security, we are all being treated as if we are criminals. A government by he people for the people only lives in history and other nations.
__________________
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government...." - Thomas Jefferson |
June 7, 2013, 09:20 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
Government has grown so much that it feels the need to protect itself from citizens if they truly were interested in threats from around the world our borders and immigration policies would be far more restricted. Much like the TSA searching old ladies in wheel chairs & small children it's all nonsense.
We are losing freedom and privacy at a fast rate and as government grows so will the intrusion into our lives. Political correctness and liberalism equal less freedom. |
June 7, 2013, 09:52 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
I don't have a problem with it. Gathering the data blind is fine as long as a warrant - signed by a judge with probable cause-is required to actually pull a particular phone call. This is just building the data bank.
I'd already assumed anything sent over the wires/online was out there forever. Did you think it wasn't? |
June 7, 2013, 10:27 AM | #22 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
They have the information. They only need a warrant if the evidence is going to be admissible in court. Whether or not they're "allowed" to look at whatever they want is irrelevant. Since no one will know except them, it won't matter until the evidence has to go to court and all they have to do use that evidence is gather enough OTHER evidence to justify a warrant for the evidence that they already obtained and it's magically admissible.
It's like when I worked at the bank. No one was "allowed" to look at any account without a specific reason but since no one knew or could possibly keep track of who did what/why/when, anybody could look at anything they wanted to look at whenever they wanted.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
June 7, 2013, 10:32 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
Thats all you're guaranteed under the Constitution.
Police can make a search. If that search violates the Constitution on one or more grounds that search and fruits therein can be thrown out. Nothing says they can't spy on you. They just can't use it against you in a court of law unless they have a valid warrant. |
June 7, 2013, 10:41 AM | #24 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
As a general matter, secret courts make me nervous for our civil liberties.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
June 7, 2013, 10:50 AM | #25 | ||
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
We're protected from unreasonable SEARCH and SEIZURE. Quote:
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
||
|
|