November 5, 2004, 07:38 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2004
Posts: 11
|
IDPA vs IPSC
For those of you who shoot in either of these disciplines:
Why would someone choose one over another? Which of the sports is the next "logical" step after range shooting (moving up--or on) from target shooting to improving on that skill and taking your shooting to the "next level" of competence? Which sport offers a person the most realistic chance of improving their possibility of surviving an attack from bad guys (if I'd decide to pursue a CCW permit and would therefore be armed when the attack occurs). I live in an area that has both IPSC and IDPA chapters within about an hour of me. Do you guys have opinions about which makes sense to participate in? Equipment---Sig 220 and CZ85 Combat. No holsters, belts, magazine pouches. Experience---I've been target shooting for 8 months and have taken basic handgun course and 2 extra hours of instruction. Thanks |
November 5, 2004, 08:28 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Posts: 107
|
Since you mentioned surviving an attack I would definitely choose IDPA.
|
November 5, 2004, 10:03 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 21, 2004
Posts: 316
|
I haven't shot an IDPA match yet, but I've been shooting IPSC matches for about 5 years.
IDPA rules and course design are closer to what you might encounter in a real world situation. IPSC courses are usually a little less realistic but the round count (shots fired) is generally higher. You get out of it what you put into it. Try both and see what you think. You will find your fellow shooters to be very friendly and helpful. When people think IPSC, they tend to think of open class. Open class guns have a speed and mag capacity advantage, but are not practical in the real world. Don't worry about it. IPSC has several classes and you only shoot against people in your class. You also don't need full race gear to compete. I started out with a cheap Uncle Mike's holster and borrowed mag pouches. With your guns, you could compete in Limited, Limited 10, or Production class. For IDPA, 3 mags is the limit plus a "barney" mag for loading the chamber. For IPSC, you will want about 50 rds worth of mags. Your main concern will be maximizing trigger time while having to move, reload your gun, and mainly THINK while you are shooting-all in a situation that is a bit stressful. For more info, try: USPSA.org brianenos.com |
November 6, 2004, 04:24 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2001
Posts: 115
|
Do both.
Any time someone brings up the whole IDPA vs. IPSC, I post Rob Leatham's response he posted at Brian Enos forum Quote:
|
|
November 6, 2004, 10:23 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2004
Posts: 11
|
Scooter2, Scottys1, GaryXD,
Thanks for the information and advice. I'll check out both as well as reading some other postings on the competition thread. |
November 12, 2004, 06:35 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: October 3, 2004
Posts: 19
|
Shoot Both
I vote for both.
I started out shooting IDPA, now I am expanding out and shooting IPSC and PPC... I shoot them all because I enjoy shooting. If you're looking for training for carry, this isn't necessarily the way to do it;None of them are going to be true indicators of what you'd do in a reall life situation. That said, they all give you more trigger time, and time to get comfortable with a firearm than most folks I know who carry (many of whom seem to make sure to take one good class and then never practice, or shoot for fun etc). |
November 13, 2004, 12:24 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: March 26, 2002
Location: MARYLAND
Posts: 65
|
Just shoot
Try em out and see what is more of a challenge. I think that shooting one or the other will not be the differnce. The key is knowing your firearm of choice, how it runs, and what makes it run, shooting in the most uncomfortable / impossible ways you never thought you would shoot. I shoot both sports and enjoy them.
|
December 29, 2004, 10:49 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2004
Posts: 24
|
Both Seems Like a Good Choice
I will side with the crowd voting for both. Although I have not shot an IDPA match, one of my shooting buddies is big into IDPA. I am into USPSA, and have been since the late 80's.
On the USPSA side, you will learn to shoot and move fast to be competitive. I honestly can't consciously remember focusing on the front sight much after the first shot. Yes, I do use it throughout each stage, but it becomes a subconscious task. My club runs 8-stage matches with about 160-180 rounds required to engage each target. Although not "realistic" in the sense of "Clearing a house", I have gained immense confidence in rapid target acquisition and engagement. Of recent, I have tried to do "less" planning of each stage and let it flow naturally after the buzzer. Makes me a little less competitive in overall standing, but adds to the enjoyment for me. I have also shot a few rounds of PPC. Compared to USPSA, it feels like bullseye shooting pace. Still fun and good for concentrating on pure accuracy. Overall, try both and see what you like better. You may find that you will want to get a combination of both. One word of warning though, pick one of your pistols for competition and stick with it. I went through a season of juggling between a couple pistols and my season was terrible. I drifted back to the reliable ol' single stack 45acp and love it. Good luck and enjoy. |
January 2, 2005, 06:00 AM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 13
|
These guys are right, try both. I shoot both and like it even more trigger time and I get to play with more gun stuff. I have found I do better in each sport when I shoot the other also.
You have guns you can use in either one, go check them out. Bring some ammo and what gear you have. Both ipsc and idpa guys will try to get you to shoot when you go to check it out, just do it. Everyone is new I was, everyone here was. They will walk you thru the rules a bit and safty stuff.
__________________
Shoot First |
January 2, 2005, 01:33 PM | #10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 30, 2004
Location: San Francisco, Sissyland
Posts: 2
|
Comparing IPSC and IDPA is like comparing offroad racing to formula 1- They're two totally different things.
|
January 2, 2005, 07:14 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2001
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 776
|
Actually they are the same thing with slightly different rules!
__________________
Gun control theory - A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet. |
January 4, 2005, 06:05 PM | #12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 7
|
This is a great question and, being new to competition, I've been wondering the same thing.
I understand all the comments about how both IPSC and IDPA are good in their own ways and that using both is also good. But, unless I read it wrong, the rules seem to favor different types of equipment. For example, in IDPA, the equipment is that which would be worn in concealed carry. So, slimmer (single stack mags) weapons like the 1911-style pistols would be the norm, I guess. In IPSC, the production class doesn't allow single action pistols and, due to the number of rounds fired, it looks like one would be at a disadvantage with only 7 or 8-shot mags. Yes, there are other classes in IPSC but then you're up against custom stuff, right? Personally, I like both my 1911-style and my H&K USP. I know I should pick one and stick with it. I haven't decided which one to go with. So I thought maybe the type of competition might help me decide. It seems the USP would be more suited for IPSC while the Colt would be more suited for the IDPA. Dazed and confused newbie (to competition, not to shooting) Michael |
January 4, 2005, 07:04 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 3, 2002
Posts: 919
|
Good, reliable 10-round magazines
for your 1911 can be gotten from Chip McCormick and other manufacturers. Use the 10-rounders for USPSA and you can shoot L-10 with no capacity disadvantage.
|
January 4, 2005, 08:21 PM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 7
|
Hmm. Then I wonder why it's not more popular. Since my interest is a little off the topic of the original poster, I've started a new thread.
__________________
Michael Fox NRA Lifetime Member |
January 8, 2005, 09:54 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
truth
NOW this is easier to answer: Because all you new 'cheaters' (those with now-banned gear) can bring it to USPSA. You can still do all the stuff you had to do in IDPA, too.
Except you won't win.
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
January 8, 2005, 11:02 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2005
Location: the great state of Texas
Posts: 854
|
do both! any trigger time is better than no trigger time! I shot IDPA and IPSC at the same time. It's fun just do it!
|
January 9, 2005, 12:21 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 86
|
If you're really new to competitive shooting I'd say go with IDPA for awhile at the local club level. It is great for beginners, you can compete with almost anything (new rule book notwithstanding!) AND it's closer to playing cops and robbers than the other shooting sport.
Once you get used to the buzzer and spectators try IPSC. I've heard it said that you will learn to shoot faster and more accurately here than any other sport. YMMV of course. I think IDPA is fun and more compatible with my goals, but that is me. If you grow weary of playing games go to some more shooting schools and concentrate on more tactical skills. Then, based on your experience with IDPA and IPSC, choose one and use it to hone your new skills in order to better yourself, not win plaques. |
January 9, 2005, 12:54 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2004
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 715
|
IDPA or IPSC?
Shoot both!
You have a Sig 220. Get a bunch of spare magazines and an appropriate holster and you can shoot both IDPA Stock Service Pistol and IPSC Production Class (I do with a Sig 226R-DAK). However, last week IDPA did change their holster rules!! A lot of the kydex holsters that were previously approved are no longer. So consider that when buying a holster and a mag pouch. Get something you can use in both disciplines. Most IDPA stages are simple tests of basic skills, as are the IPSC classifier matches. I like to shoot the "run & gun" assault courses, but actually prefer the classifiers in IPSC because they cycle faster so there is usually less down time at the range waiting to shoot. And I particularly like the IDPA classifier match as a good test of basic skills, even though it's 90 rounds and takes a long time to run. There are advantages and disadvantages to both games. Remember that you will be learning dynamic shooting and the scenario you participate in may or may not be realistic or tactically correct. Just take it for what it is, be safe, have a good time, learn what you can and have a good time. |
January 12, 2005, 05:31 PM | #19 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
|
My .02
IDPA. Or both. Both have some elements of silliness about them, such as IDPAs too-strict holster limitations (IMO), and the classification of the XD in ESP because of the trigger. But IDPA still tries to be more realistic in terms of trying to duplicate actual possible defensive encounters at realistic ranges, not 75 yards and such. Notably, I personally have an intense disdain for the IPSC race holsters, as being the quintessential NON-practical gear item, for a game with a "P" in its name. Beyond stupid. To a lesser extent, disdain for open class too. However, red dots and comps are not nearly as stupid as race holsters, because one might actually make a holster to accomodate your pistol with red dot, and carry it, whereas one NEVER uses a race holster in everyday life - sure would like to hear if someone does. However, these details can be overlooked - just use your standard carry holster and don't shoot open - it won't make a real difference in where your score ends up. All the above is if you look at the game as preparation for actual defense. If you look at it as strictly a game, then they're both a kick in the pants.
P.S. If there were to come a day where I show up at an IDPA match, and the holster which I *actually* use for everyday carry is disallowed, then I would shoot the match with my disallowed holster, and simply not be scored (or not have my score count), and never attend again, because then IDPA will have lost its way as much as IPSC. The holster restrictions are starting to border on ridiculous. |
January 12, 2005, 11:56 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2004
Location: Northcentral Florida
Posts: 161
|
I suspect the decision may largely be driven by what is available or popular in your area and which group gives you the biggest welcome. By all means, shoot both if you can but have fun regardless of which you choose.
__________________
CONSISTENCY -It's only a virtue if you're not a complete screwup.
|
January 13, 2005, 01:31 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,518
|
michaelefox - A good IDPA-legal rig will serve for IPSC, too. The reverse is not necessarily true. A HK USP is a great gun for both sports. If you have it in .40, with the trigger module that allows either DA/SA or cocked 'n' locked use, you can shoot in SSP (DA) and ESP (SA) in IDPA, or Production (DA), Limited or Limited 10 (SA) in IPCS/USPSA. 10-round mags are fine for all, but will put you at a disadvantage in Limited; you'll want hi-caps for that. If it's a 9, then you can still competitively run SSP, ESP, and Production.
|
January 14, 2005, 12:35 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: July 18, 2004
Posts: 23
|
75 yds? 3 gun match??
|
January 14, 2005, 10:18 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2001
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 776
|
In case some of the people here dont know. The quote Scooter 2 posted near the top was from the winningest IPSC AND IDPA shooter ever.
__________________
Gun control theory - A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet. |
January 23, 2005, 12:21 PM | #24 |
Registration in progress
Join Date: April 28, 2000
Location: New Orleans, USA
Posts: 785
|
I love shooting both. IDPA does not really offer any more real world scenario encounter than the other, but it does in pre-production USPSA world offer a place for the $500 glock to compete without having to add this and that. I like USPSA as it usually is more round counts per stage. At a atch that has 30 shooters, one has to wait a while before being called- set restage costs about the same amount of time between shooters so in IDPA where you shoot 12 rnd (mostly) vs USPSA where you shoot say 24 rnds, I get more trigger time in. I like the you decide how to shoot the courses in USPSA, but sometimes appreciate the tactical order and sequencing of IDPA.
What I dislike about IDPA- besides BOD banning nonsense is sometimes the stages get too trite trying to up round counts while keeping the stage practical, what I dislike about USPSA is the seemingly unlimited time people can wander through the stage airgunning and sometimes a great deal of time on the firing line while the person repeatedly thinks through the stage.
__________________
Violent behavior is an expression of failure. It always takes more brains, resourcefulness, and heroism to make peace than war. |
March 20, 2005, 10:58 PM | #25 |
Junior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5
|
Shoot both
Any comparison that leads to a measurement of which is better is bull-oney. They both serve a function, which is to give you trigger time. The more you shoot, the better you are. Simulated stress in both is a great training tool. One will be better (more tactical) when the stage design has someone shooting live rounds back at you. Neither does that, yet. All these race guns that some people trash work like a 1911 single stack. I have two race guns but 5 single stacks. The controls are the same on all of them. Rob Leatham (he really is the greatest of all time) was right. Neither is better. Shoot them both.
.45 is my caliber of choice for defense, but Matt Burkett had the best defense of 9mm I've heard. Paraphrased..." everyone makes fun of the 9mm for defense, but I've never seen anyone volunteer to go downrange and catch them". When anyone starts getting too sanctimonious about their sport/organization, remember this. As long as they're keeping score, it's still a game. Jim |
|
|