|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 30, 2010, 04:05 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
Need help to ID S&W Revolver before I trade for it.
I came across this S&W revolver and it has no model number on it. On top of the barrel it says Smith and Wesson, Springfield Mass, USA. Patented Dec 17 1901 - Feb 6 1908, Sept 14 1909. On the side of the barrel it says 44 S&W special ctg. Above the trigger guard it has Made in USA. The only number markings are W 64272. The pictures are not very good, but it is all I have. Thanks for any help.
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! Last edited by breeze; May 30, 2010 at 08:50 PM. |
May 30, 2010, 06:07 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,534
|
S&W .44 Second Model Hand Ejector. Made from 1915 until 1940. (They didn't get model numbers until 1957, before that, they had real names.)
A very desirable revolver. |
May 30, 2010, 06:42 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
S&W
Thanks for the info. Any idea of what the value of this may be? I am pretty sure it has been re-blued. I am asking only because a person wants to trade me for another gun. Thanks again. Bruce
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
May 30, 2010, 08:46 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
S&W
What I am asking is that I am trading a $600 gun for it. Would it be worth the trade? Thanks.
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
May 30, 2010, 09:59 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 384
|
I don't think there's enough info to really put a value on it. I agree with Jim that it looks like a .44 HE 2nd Model. That's the only model that didn't have an ejector shroud. The barrel doesn't look quite long enough to be the standard 6-1/2 in. barrel. But it doesn't look short enough to be 5 in. Maybe it's just the pics (or maybe my eyes). A 5 in. barrel would be worth more. If it's been reblued then that would affect the value too. If it was done by the S&W factory then it doesn't push the value down quite as much. Where on the gun is the W number? That doesn't look right for being the serial number. The serial number should be on the butt of the grip frame (and not covered by the grips, I don't think). And do you know its condition? That affects the value a lot too.
|
May 30, 2010, 10:21 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
S&W
The number came from the frame where the model number would be and on the bottom of the butt. Thanks
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
May 30, 2010, 10:28 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
S&W
SORRY, the butt has 26243 on it.
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
May 30, 2010, 10:39 PM | #8 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
It is impossible to tell from the pictures, but the gun may have been refinished. The hammer and trigger appear to be polished where they should be color case hardened and the finish looks a bit too shiny for an S&W of that period. If considering purchase, I advise careful scrutiny.
Jim |
May 30, 2010, 10:57 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
S&W
Jim, I am 98% sure that the gun has been refinished. It looks way to good to be as old as it is. The person I'm thinking about trading has mentioned he has had the gun for about 15 years and has not shot it more than 25 times, but it looked like it does now when he got it. From the looks of the wear on the grips, the rest of the gun should show more wear. The lettering and insignia do not show much polishing so I suspect that it was a pro job. I would like to add it to my collection, but I would hate to trade off a higher dollar gun for a gun that could be worth much less. Thanks for the help.
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
May 31, 2010, 08:12 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Posts: 384
|
Serial number 26243 = manufactured in 1926.
|
May 31, 2010, 04:21 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
S&W
Thanks to all for the great and helpful information, I think i will add it to my collection.
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
June 2, 2010, 05:32 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
Better pics
Maybe these will help
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
June 2, 2010, 05:37 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
more
more pics
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
June 2, 2010, 05:41 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
couple more
I hope these help with positive ID, THANKS!
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
June 5, 2010, 12:47 AM | #15 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
|
Breeze,
Nice revolver. Unfortunately it's missing the lanyard ring, but that is fairly easy to replace. If the gun is not refinished, it's worth WELL in excess of $600, probably closer to $1500. Even refinished, a good refinish job, which is what you think it is, is worth at least $600 as a shooter. The big .44 Smiths are very desirable as shooters. Unless something really stands out, I'd be inclined to make the trade, but then again I LOVE the big Smiths.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
June 5, 2010, 12:50 AM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
|
You know, given how sharp that trademark looks under the thumb latch, I would not at all be surprised if this gun was in original finish.
It's virtually impossible to refinish one of these old Smiths without seriously damaging the logo during polishing. Unfortunately, the pictures you posted of the barrel markings are undecipherable. If you're using a digital camera, read the manual and figure out how to turn the macro feature on to get good pictures of fine, close up details.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
June 5, 2010, 01:13 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 129
|
Thanks Mike
Thanks for the info, after taking a relly good look, I don't think it has been re-finished. I made the trade and am happy to say that it locks up very nice and all operations are correct. Thanks ALL for the info.
__________________
Don't mistake kindness for weakness! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|