The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 14, 2010, 11:37 AM   #1
Patrice
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 174
.451 or .454 pistol balls???

Hello, I received a Pietta replica 1858 Remington New Army for a birthday present. [<Sigh>That's what I get for eye-balling them in the Cabela's Display Case.] Beautiful gun, but cap & ball revolvers are totally foreign to me, at this point. Can you gentlemen tell me what is the appropriate-size pistol ball to use. I believe I saw reference to .451 & .454 size .44 caliber balls in the information that came with the gun. Looking at the product reviews doesn't help that much; I see some guys saying that they use the .454 size, & others saying they use the .451. Help me out here, guys?--Patrice
Patrice is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 12:22 PM   #2
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
I use .454's. They shave a little more lead giving a better surface for the rifling to grip.
Hawg is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 01:15 PM   #3
zippy13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
Gotta go with the Hawg. I was just shooting .451s in a Cabela's M-58 and got very little "halo" while loading. Also, the Pietta manual (downloadable .pdf) recommends .454 balls for their .44 cal revolvers.

Last edited by zippy13; March 14, 2010 at 01:37 PM.
zippy13 is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 01:36 PM   #4
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
.454 is just enough to give a decent ring in my Uberti.
wogpotter is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 01:45 PM   #5
horseman308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 526
I also use .454's in my '58. It gives a decent little shaved ring when pressing the ball into the chamber. I've heard people sometimes use .457's, which will give even more shaved lead for a bigger surface for the rifling to grip. But it also seems that those could be enough harder to load that it won't matter. Just go with. 454's and you'll be fine.
__________________
You only take one shot at a time - make it count.
horseman308 is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 02:36 PM   #6
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
Without knowing the actual chamber diameters of YOUR gun, it's just a guess. It is more LIKELY that .454 is the better choice, but some guns can use .451's. The only advantage, however, is a bit more velocity and they're a bit easier to load. Just a little bit, often not enough to notice.

If you have access to a vernier caliper, measure the chambers and you'll know for sure. Otherwise, the .454 is not a bad answer.
mykeal is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 03:00 PM   #7
Powderman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,166
Shaving a lot of lead or a little lead is a totally subjective thing. As long as you are shaving SOME off with each seating, it means that (using a dead soft ball, of course) the ball is slightly over bore diameter--which is a good thing.

Of course, if you want to really go to the races, contact Buffalo Arms Company, and order a mold, made in the exact diameter you want for the bullet you want.
__________________
Hiding in plain sight...
Powderman is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 06:07 PM   #8
Patrice
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 174
Okay, gentlemen; thankyou. I get the idea, as well as the information.--Patrice
Patrice is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 06:07 PM   #9
PetahW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,678
I guess that the Pietta .44 Remington pattern guns differ from their .44 Colt 1860 pattern, because my M1860 uses .457" commercial RB's (Speer), just shaving off a hair ring of lead during seating - exactly the same as my Ruger Old Army.

.
PetahW is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 09:01 PM   #10
zippy13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,442
I shoot .457 in my Ruger Old Army, too. As suggested by mykeal, I put the calipers to the holes, and the Pietta dials in at .443 to .444 and the Ruger's more uniform at about .4505.
zippy13 is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 09:17 PM   #11
Gatofeo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2004
Location: Remote Utah desert
Posts: 224
About 12 years ago I first entered the internet, and began discovering gun and reloading message boards.
Shortly after, I began posting replies suggesting that cap and ball sixguns be fed balls slightly larger than what was currently suggested.
I've been shooting cap and ball sixguns since about 1970. Through the years I've learned to use .454 or .457 balls in the .44s (the Ruger requires .457 balls, by the way) and .380 inch balls in the .36.
The larger balls tend to be more accurate, and they certainly hold in place better in the cylinder. In my Colt 2nd generation 1851 Navy, the chambers are so large that I've sometimes pulled the bull back out with the rammer after seating it. In fairness, Colt suggests a ball of .378 in the manual that came with it.
Try finding a .378 inch ball ...
But I found a .380 double cavity bullet mould years ago and started using that.
The difference in seating was obvious, and it appeared on the target as well.
This led me to postulate that the larger ball, when rammed into the chamber, naturally created a wider bearing band for the rifling to grip. So, I reasoned, accuracy was enhanced by the wider bearing band.
I believe I was the first to notice this. Prior to about 2000, I've never seen anyone suggesting that the larger ball not only sealed better, but gave a wider area for the rifling to grip.
My first cap and ball was a cheap .44 on the 1851 Navy platform. I started with .451 balls, then started purchasing .454 balls that were locally cast. Later, Hornady and Speer introduced .454 balls.
I've written Hornady and Speer, suggesting that they offer .380 balls, but never got a response.
__________________
"And lo, did I see an ugly cat. Smoke. Brimstone. Holes in parchment. And this ugly cat was much amused." --- The Prophesies of Gatodamus (1503 - 1566)
Gatofeo is offline  
Old March 14, 2010, 09:36 PM   #12
TXGunNut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: If you have to ask...
Posts: 2,860
What fascinates me about black powder shooting is that IMHO so much technology was lost with the development of modern smokeless powder cartridges. I suspect, Gatofeo, that you were very observant and have re-discovered what was common knowledge to shooting enthusiasts a century and a half ago. Thanks for sharing and please, keep on exploring and sharing. I think there are many more things that our forefathers knew about BP and lead that we still haven't figured out.
__________________
Life Member NRA, TSRA
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call Lonesome Dove
My favorite recipes start out with a handful of used wheelweights.
TXGunNut is offline  
Old March 16, 2010, 01:26 AM   #13
Hedning
Member
 
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Location: Eastern Norway
Posts: 43
Me and the blokes in our BP club over here in Norway use nothing but .457 balls. Some use .462 aswell. Makes a larger area for the grooves to grip the ball.
Hedning is offline  
Old March 16, 2010, 02:44 AM   #14
Bootsie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2007
Location: Hofheim/Germany
Posts: 102
With a new C&B revolver I measure the rifling groove diameter and the chamber dia. Ideally, they should be about the same. If that is the case the ball ought to be ca. .003 bigger than the measurements, i. e. if the dias are .451 I select a .454 dia ball.
If the chamber dia is much bigger than the rifling groove dia I return the gun because to correct that will be expensive. If the chambers are smaller, however, I will have that altered to rifling groove dia by a knowledgable gunsmith.
Just my 2 €-cent.
Bootsie
Bootsie is offline  
Old March 16, 2010, 05:00 AM   #15
drdirk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2004
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 179
I have also used both but now use 454 almost exclusively. I found that even if the 451 shave some lead, there was a good chance that they would actually move under recoil a bit. This was especially the case when the gun was getting very hot. Measure both, the cylinder and the barrel. Then try it out.
drdirk is offline  
Old March 16, 2010, 05:40 AM   #16
Delmar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Norhthern Indiana
Posts: 307
The guy who sold me my Pietta 1858 through in almost 500 451 balls with the deal, so I will shoot them all, but I'm going to go with 454 after that. I should go ahead and order some 454 because they don't shave any lead going into my 1851.
Delmar is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05359 seconds with 10 queries