|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 23, 2012, 12:56 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2011
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 337
|
Primary Arms red dot magnifiers
Anyone have any experience with these? I see they also have a 6x now as well. I spent the money to get a great red dot sight (Aimpoint Miicro H1, 2MOA), but have an issue paying top dollar for the G23 3x magnifier. Will be using it primarily when I go target shooting 200-300 yards.
https://www.primaryarms.com/Red_Dot_...iers_s/910.htm |
September 23, 2012, 01:21 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 980
|
Is the 2 MOA dot increased by the same amount as the magnifier? If so, I wouldn't want one. I couldn't imagine shooting at several hundred yard with a red dot optic that has a 6 or 12 MOA dot in it.
Last edited by arizona98tj; September 23, 2012 at 01:26 PM. |
September 23, 2012, 01:51 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2011
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 337
|
Good question? I'm going to call PA tomorrow and find out some details.
|
September 23, 2012, 03:16 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 980
|
I checked out the EOTech site. They showed their optic with a magnifier. The magnifier sits between your eye and the red dot optic.
That means your red dot will be magnified X times. So....a 2 MOA dot times 3 power magnifier gives a 6 MOA dot. At 300 yds, that would cover approximately 18 inches of the target. If my math/process is incorrect, I'm sure someone will point it out. |
September 23, 2012, 04:22 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2011
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 337
|
Thanks for the clarification
|
September 24, 2012, 09:36 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
IMHO red dot magnifiers have terrible optic quality. A clear target at less magnification is better than a fuzzy magnified target. Then there's the added weight, if used with a flip over mount it's awkward.
|
September 24, 2012, 11:57 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 13, 2011
Location: Carolina
Posts: 3,415
|
Quote:
+1 I've tried them but in the end just end up selling them.
__________________
Mrgunsngear Youtube Channel |
|
September 24, 2012, 02:17 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 16, 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,891
|
I actually have one of these from Primary Arms. I think it's the 3x magnifier.
It's not that bad at all for the price. The flip mount that they sell for it is no good though. Too much movement when mounted.
__________________
Hopp Custom Leather <------ click for HOLSTER awesomeness!! -There is no theory of evolution... Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live. |
September 24, 2012, 07:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2011
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 337
|
I think I'm going to pass on the 3x magnifier. I'll probably just pick up a 1-3x scope for those trips that I want magnification.
|
September 24, 2012, 10:53 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 980
|
FWIW....I would stay away from the Millet DMS-1. I have one...wouldn't recommend it to anyone. First time I gave it a good thump during some range drills, the illuminated reticle stopped illuminating. That didn't make much of a difference though because it wasn't bright enough to see on a sunny day. It weighs 1 1/2 pounds....too heavy in my opinion for an optic of that power range. Aside from the previously mentioned issues, and the distortion viewable at the edge of the glass, it's really pretty good.
|
September 24, 2012, 10:57 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2011
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 337
|
Most likely the Leupold Mark AR 1-3x
|
September 25, 2012, 09:07 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2002
Posts: 108
|
The magnifier will NOT change the size of the dot relative to the target; both are magnified the same amount. For example, a 3 MOA dot covers the bottom of a soda can @ 100 yards with no magnification (1x); with a 3x magnifier, the dot will still cover the bottom of the can, no more, as the can got 3x bigger, too.
|
September 26, 2012, 02:58 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2012
Posts: 423
|
What he said.... Your dot is magnified with the target but it's not covering any more of the target than it was unmagnified.
|
|
|