|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 27, 2013, 01:40 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 1999
Location: Idaho
Posts: 489
|
The cat is out of the Bag - Total Confiscation
Well TFLers,
Here is the article that firms up what we all know and it is spelled out in a step by step progressive formula to totally confiscate our firearms. Not just a selected few, BUT ALL OF THEM. It is the old frog in the heated pot of water. Just a few of the paragraph's.... "The only way we can truly be safe and prevent further gun violence is to ban civilian ownership of all guns. That means everything. No pistols, no revolvers, no semiautomatic or automatic rifles. No bolt action. No breaking actions or falling blocks. Nothing. This is the only thing that we can possibly do to keep our children safe from both mass murder and common street violence. Unfortunately, right now we can't. The political will is there, but the institutions are not. Honestly, this is a good thing. If we passed a law tomorrow banning all firearms, we would have massive noncompliance. What we need to do is establish the regulatory and informational institutions first. This is how we do it......" Another: "We must make guns expensive and unpopular, just like cigarettes. A nationwide, antigun campaign paid for by a per gun yearly tax paid by owners, dealers, and manufacturers would work well in this regard. We should also segway into an anti-hunting campaign, like those in the UK. By making hunting expensive and unpopular, we can make the transition to a gun free society much less of a headache for us." Want to read the whole thing and its not that long: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/1...g-term-process Probably the rants of a mad man liberal crazy nutcase and I know that most of us will say "nah, can't happen here", however, I bet those in Germany, Japan, Russia, etc. said the same thing years ago to the tune of hundreds of millions of lives. What do you think????
__________________
To own firearms is to affirm that freedom and liberty are not gifts from the state. Winchesters Forever (Levers and Pumps 73s, 90s, 92s, 06s, 61s and 63s) |
January 27, 2013, 04:29 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,323
|
It's no secret that there are liberals out there, like many of California's elected officials, that want a blanket ban on all firearms.
That said, if you look over the comments the author of that article made in the comments section, you will see that he doesn't even have a clue about what the second amendment actually stands for, and that many of the commenters disagree with him. In fact, it's quite clear that he's your basic liberal idiot who thinks banning civilian ownership of firearms is going to somehow stop violence dead in its tracks.
__________________
"Si vis pacem, para bellum" - If you want peace, prepare for war. Last edited by Auto426; January 27, 2013 at 04:34 AM. |
January 27, 2013, 09:26 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2013
Location: Stalingrad Connecticut
Posts: 216
|
Heston
will come back from the dead |
January 27, 2013, 09:27 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 1999
Location: Idaho
Posts: 489
|
Auto246 -
Yes, you are right he is a typical liberal who knows nothing about the 2nd. It is also, even though a column comment, the first time that I have read in some sort of written specificity a citizens detail of the "confiscation map". This map to confiscation is an inherent learned lesson in the minds of the progressives of our country. My bet is that he is a 50ish college graduate in journalism from some liberal college and Saul Alinsky is his hero. To him, it doesn't matter about the meaning and reason for the RTKBA, it is the socialistic training he has received for this very thing that we all have been worried about. As we all know, registry in the form of Universal BG checks is the lead to control of weapons one can and cannot have and is being promoted almost daily in black and white All freedom loving citizens of this country need to become fully aware of this map to confiscation and that it lies squarely in "our" laps to make all aware of what will happon if we do not act now.
__________________
To own firearms is to affirm that freedom and liberty are not gifts from the state. Winchesters Forever (Levers and Pumps 73s, 90s, 92s, 06s, 61s and 63s) |
January 27, 2013, 09:42 AM | #5 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Guys, that is clearly written by a gun owner. When was the last time you met a gun control supporter who casually threw around terms like "7.62x54R" "AWB" and "GOA.". Outside of gun forums, those terms are meaningless. Opposition to guns is often driven by ignorance (see "shoulder thing that goes up") yet this guy is familiar with all the laws and functional specifics.
IIRC, that article was written by someone at AR15.com who was just trying to provoke liberals into arguing for even more insane laws. |
January 27, 2013, 10:06 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2008
Location: Upper Michigan, above the Mackinac Bridge
Posts: 568
|
Obamacare
Be aware that how they will derive the list is through the CDC. With his recent executive order mandating/clarifying that all healthcare professionals MUST ask if you have firearms in your home as part of the pre-screening process, they will have their list nice and tidy. The premise is so that your regular doctor can now decide if you are mentally stable enough to own firearms. If they feel you are not, your name goes to the CDC and they come knocking on the premise of safety. They don't need to pass anything, the government already did!
|
January 27, 2013, 10:12 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,084
|
Some Non-Gun People have good comments
This from the Editorial of my local paper. If only it could make it into the Washington Post! Here is the entire article,
Quote:
__________________
Gbro CGVS For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18 |
|
January 27, 2013, 10:12 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 3, 2009
Posts: 509
|
This is part of the Progressive agenda and nothing new. To my mind, the Progressive movement is the greatest threat to our country. Sorry if this is too political...
|
January 27, 2013, 10:18 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Quote:
|
|
January 27, 2013, 10:20 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2012
Posts: 527
|
I heard this morning that govt. employees (congress) are exempt from the law if passed, anyone else hear that rumor?
|
January 27, 2013, 10:58 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 27, 2012
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 525
|
Still, all I am seeing are more ideas that will take away firearms from law abiding citizens, but yet does nothing to adress the use of firearms used in crimes. I just don't get why people can't see that all a full ban of guns would do is give the criminals the upper hand.
__________________
I don't always go to the range, but when I do, I prefer dosAKs. They say 5 out of 4 people are bad at math. |
January 27, 2013, 11:04 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 1999
Location: Idaho
Posts: 489
|
Grizz12 -
The words in the Diane Feinstein bill (which has only been introduced) has the words "exemption of law enforcement and government officials" embedded in the bill structure. This is probably what you heard or read. What is a Government official? Who knows at this point. The Govt could use the language to exempt only Senators and Congressman, but could extend that to as minor an "official" as a janitor in the warehouse in a Government stationary store???? This is precisely why the citizens of the US feel a need to arm themselves against the government. As long as those in power abuse their power by exempting themselves and who they choose from the controls they are all too willing to place on the citizens, the citizens will recognize those in power as being a threat.
__________________
To own firearms is to affirm that freedom and liberty are not gifts from the state. Winchesters Forever (Levers and Pumps 73s, 90s, 92s, 06s, 61s and 63s) |
January 27, 2013, 11:06 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 5, 2011
Posts: 350
|
The cat is out of the bag? Really?
You guys need to find something else to be paranoid about. Take a look at the poll at the end of the article... even on Dailykos there is less than 2% support. |
January 27, 2013, 11:55 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2008
Location: Upper Michigan, above the Mackinac Bridge
Posts: 568
|
With all due respect, his EO did clarify the requirement for healthcare professionals to help with the mental illness aspect. Thats what the professionals who do that for a living have said. That isn't my opinion, but rather their interpretation in relation to all of his recent EO's.
|
January 27, 2013, 11:59 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 7, 2008
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 122
|
Here's the thing: with the Heller decision, the only way you could legally do this would be to add an amendment to the Constitution repealing the 2nd amendment. Even if this actually happened (I would put the probability of this happening at zero percent), there is the practical matter that the government would have to somehow try to enforce it. Consider the local and state LEO agencies which are sending open letters to the president specifically refusing to enforce laws they feel violate the 2nd amendment (high capacity mag ban, "assault weapons").
I have zero concern about a total ban. |
January 27, 2013, 12:24 PM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: June 2, 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
Here's the bottom line: enforcing the existing laws (anywhere from 300 to "more than 20,000") has been, and remains, financially unaffordable, and so would a new one which calls for universal registration (the basis for taxation, and BTW, confiscation) of the 300 million (ok, make it 200 million, or even 50 million, post boat accidents) firearms out there. The government couldn't even keep track of the 2K guns in Fast & Furious (so far they've located two, with disastrous consequences). As an AZ resident, I am furious about how such a negligent and dangerous mindset (and accompanying performance) on the part of those in .gov connected with this failed program continues to have the support of the liberals. I've seen denial, but this takes the cake. MR2 PS. The image of riding a two-wheeled device in an anti-hunting campaign captures the tone and value of said article. Last edited by mister2; January 27, 2013 at 12:31 PM. |
|
January 27, 2013, 12:24 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: January 21, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 67
|
Actually, the comments section for this is a great read. Virtually all the arguments are against this "proposal". Pretty funny. My favorite: "[color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color][color=#FF0000]█[/color] like this gives liberals a bad name. You should delete this police state fantasy."
|
January 27, 2013, 12:33 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
|
Quote:
Tin foil hat material. Rants of an extremist. No different than the rants of a extreme pro-gunner that thinks even the dangerously mentally ill have the inherent right to own nuclear weapons. |
|
January 27, 2013, 12:42 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 647
|
I can't believe a liberal blog site like Kos published a post about banning guns! OMG, we should boycott somebody!
Seriously? Do you go looking for stuff to get spun up about? |
January 27, 2013, 02:26 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,323
|
Quote:
However, this author also states in the comments section that the second amendment is now null and void because the militia it mentions is now the National Guard. At least the other liberal commenters know that isn't the case.
__________________
"Si vis pacem, para bellum" - If you want peace, prepare for war. |
|
January 27, 2013, 02:34 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2010
Posts: 1,210
|
Quote:
|
|
January 27, 2013, 03:03 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: The shores of Lake Huron
Posts: 4,783
|
Quote:
__________________
Stevie-Ray Join the NRA/ILA I am the weapon; my gun is a tool. It's regrettable that with some people those descriptors are reversed. |
|
January 27, 2013, 03:14 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2010
Posts: 1,210
|
Quote:
what really gets me is the blanket use of the term 'assault weapon,' when we know they're speaking strictly about AR15's and the like. I always have to point out to people that semi-auto rifles and shotguns are used in hunting/sport shooting, so to categorize semi-auto firearms as inherently more dangerous than other firearms is a misnomer imo. |
|
January 27, 2013, 04:39 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 162
|
Quote:
|
|
January 27, 2013, 05:41 PM | #25 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|