November 20, 2011, 10:22 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 3, 2011
Location: Poteet, Texas
Posts: 959
|
Max Load Questions
I notice that most load questions want the hottest load possible for that round/gun. I've always found that the most accurate load was not the hottest load. I think that if you want to get a lot more velocity then you might be better served with a more powerful gun rather than trying to push the limits of what you have.
|
November 20, 2011, 10:45 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
|
Good advice, but on the flip side, why load a 30-06 down to 308 levels? If you want a 308 get a 308 and load it to it's safe potentials.
|
November 20, 2011, 10:49 AM | #3 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
Because if you miss it is all useless. Quote:
The goal is to HIT the target. |
||
November 20, 2011, 10:56 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Ohio, Appalachia's foothills.
Posts: 3,779
|
I have found that if you pick the right powder, the most accurate load is toward the top end and that is where the best case fill is.
|
November 20, 2011, 11:09 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 18, 2010
Location: Independence Missouri
Posts: 4,585
|
Actually my two cartridges I load most are 7mm rem mag and the .270 win,, so far I have found that the most accurate loads have not been case-filling nor Max loads. HST, It may be that the bullet weight and type I choose to use in these two calibers doesn't necessarily require "case-filling" or "max loads" to acquire the accuracy I'm looking for.
__________________
Keep your Axe sharp and your powder dry. |
November 20, 2011, 11:11 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
|
For rifle loads most of my accuracy loads are in the sligthly warm range not max. There are a couple that are on the verge of max.
Now with hand gun loads most of my accuaracy loads are nowhere near max. With that I am now off to the range to burn some rounds.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you. |
November 20, 2011, 11:25 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2009
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 2,619
|
Hottest load? Not me. I want the most accurate.
__________________
A clinger and deplorable, MAGA, and life NRA member. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Single Action .45 Colt (Sometimes colloquially referred to by its alias as the .45 'Long' Colt or .45LC). Don't leave home without it. That said, the .44Spec is right up their too... but the .45 Colt is still the king. |
November 20, 2011, 11:30 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,885
|
FWIW: The military 308/7.62 load duplicates the military 30-06 load -- intentionally.
That should calibrate things for `ya. |
November 20, 2011, 11:54 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,326
|
Good advice, until you consider that the 2 are usually the same load. Seriously, IME, loads which are hot generally are pushing the case head the hardest which is making the case fit the chamber in the most uniform way.
Now, there are over loads which accuracy turns south because the load starts doing something which moves the action/barrel out of alignment or some other issue. I'm not sure why, but overloads do start to have bad accuracy for some reason. |
November 20, 2011, 12:50 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,535
|
Most Internet Ballistics Questions are overambitious.
Neither a hundred feet per second or a quarter MOA is going to make any real difference in a hunting or even target load. And if you are a high end long range benchrest shooter to whom it does matter, you are probably not asking a bunch of strangers on the internet what to do about it. |
November 20, 2011, 04:02 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
|
it's kind of funny, but 4350 in my .243 with standard 100 grain sierra btsp gained accuracy as I pushed it up. I was getting 100 yard moa groups. Accuracy actuallyfell when i stqrted using match hp by nosler.
|
November 20, 2011, 04:52 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
Of the rifles that I shoot often, the 270's most accurate load is near max, as is the most accurate load with the 220. After much load testing, I found that the 223's best load is not max, but is pretty warm. The only rifle of mine that shoots best with a mild load is the 260. And oddly enough, the longest shots I've made in the last 2 years were both with the 260 (360 on a coyote and 390 on a big hog).
|
November 21, 2011, 08:05 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Aw, just keep loading them until she blows and then we will know the maximum load we can use to blow up the gun.
I thought folks reloaded to save money and for accuracy. Why use all the extra powder to get loads hotter and hotter? You want more bang get a larger caliber gun.
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
November 21, 2011, 09:58 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: West Central Missouri
Posts: 2,592
|
I thought it was just a "Kids" game. I am teacing two nephews how to reload. They ask the same questions another nephew asked when I taught him. Mostly, How much (more) powder can you put in this? Why can't you make it go faster. Why isn't more better?
We just loaded some .30-30 rounds with 27.5 grains of IMR 3031. Max powder load on this particular round is 31.1 grains. We loaded up six of each round doing a .5 grain increase. The more powder we used, the worse their accuracy became. Nephews .30-30 shoots 28.0 grains a little more accurate than the 27.5 grains, but falls off if we do 28.5 grains.
__________________
Inside Every Bright Idea Is The 50% Probability Of A Disaster Waiting To Happen. |
November 21, 2011, 10:35 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
How hard a case is pressed against the chamber walls has not been noted as an important accuracy driver. |
|
November 21, 2011, 10:49 AM | #16 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,061
|
I think this whole issue is very gun dependent.
A lot of benchrest shooters report best accuracy with near-maximum loads. Floated heavy barrels, carefully bedded stocks, good stable sight systems, very consistent rest support. A lot of shooters of the as-issued M1 Garand, on the other hand, find mild loads most accurate. One active competitor on another board pulls M2 ball and dumps out about 2 grains of powder to improve its accuracy in the Garand. Lighter barrel, not floated, lots of stuff in contact with it. Best not to rattle it too hard, or accuracy and contact with the other parts is more disturbed and has greater random influence on muzzle location at bullet exit. So you have to know your gun's propensities. A bolt rifle with a floated barrel may be more like the benchrest gun and less like the Garand. A lever gun, with its magazine hanger and front barrel band, may be a little more like the Garand and a little less like the benchrest gun. But YMMV. Best just to work loads up and see what your gun likes.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 21, 2011, 08:46 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: I live in the foot of the Green Mountains of Vermont
Posts: 1,602
|
Unclenick , you couldn't be more right . Guns ( rifles especially ) are each an individual . Like snowflakes and fingerprints , there are no two exactly alike ! I developed a load for my 7mm-08 that is a grain over book max charge . The more I stoked it the better it shot , still didn't have any pressure signs .
|
November 22, 2011, 01:08 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
|
name dropper
John Lawson and I were discussing this very issue, and we both noticed best accuracy from handguns came at proof load levels.
Weird, huh?
__________________
. "all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo" |
November 22, 2011, 01:37 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2009
Location: Just off Route 66
Posts: 5,067
|
Quote:
Jim
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
November 22, 2011, 02:06 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2008
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,436
|
New loaders want the hottest/fastest/most energy.
It's just part of the process, they'll figure it out, sooner or later...
__________________
Just remember, when you pull the trigger, the bullets come out going very, very fast. So make sure to keep the weapon pointing away from you. |
November 22, 2011, 02:12 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 5, 2009
Location: Just off Route 66
Posts: 5,067
|
Deleted, never mind.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum |
November 22, 2011, 07:50 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Why Soitenly!!
Quote:
"But honest Moe it was an accident"
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|
November 22, 2011, 08:55 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: August 26, 2010
Posts: 41
|
Some us are looking for close range loads with maximum kinetic energy. I don't really care if I can get even a full extra minute of angle accuracy for these types of loads. An extra 1/4" at 25 yards doesn't mean near as much to me as an extra inch of penetration on a p*ssed off boar at 10 yards. That might be the difference in reaching his heart at a bad angle.
You guys should try to keep an open mind. Many other scenarios/needs exist other than your own. Last edited by rex_lee; November 22, 2011 at 09:03 AM. |
November 22, 2011, 11:38 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
Tight necked chambers, turned necks, minimal clearance (sometimes less than 0.002 in). Benchrest is a VERY different world (though many of the techniques can be used in suitably set up guns ... they are benchrest guns used for things like varmint shooting). Loading well into the lands was used for awhile, but seems to be falling into disfavor again. Benchrest shooters could care less about pressures, and rarely even think twice. |
|
November 22, 2011, 11:57 AM | #25 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
I can't understand the "pure accuracy" philosophy any more than I understand the "max load or nothing" philosophy.
I want both... though I base it on "performance" not "max load". I bought a 7-08 because I wanted it's potential, not a 7mm at 243 energy. I bought a 204 because I wanted it's potential. Not a .204 caliber 22mag. If I can't get near max performance AND exceptional accuracy, I look for a different powder or bullet or both. Interestingly, though my experience is limited, I have thus far had no trouble finding loads that meet BOTH expectations in loads for .204Ruger, 22-250, 7mm-08, 357sig and 10mm.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
|