October 6, 2010, 08:45 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
|
clearing the house
A thought occurred to me as I pondered if I ever had to clear the house during a break in. What would I do if I caught one BG, made him get on the floor while I call the police, and then heard his partner somewhere in the house. I concluded that if I ever am woken up in the wee hours the second thing I grab will be my handcuffs for just such an incident. I work in security, so I have them but wouldn't have ever thought to use them off duty before. They would certainly be a practical tool to utilize. Most people don't own a pair though, and I wondered what anyone' thoughts are on the subject.
|
October 6, 2010, 08:49 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Duct tape
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
October 6, 2010, 08:50 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Location: Florida, near the mouse
Posts: 76
|
This is of course after you reached for your cell phone to call the police.
__________________
The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. ~ Groucho Marx |
October 6, 2010, 08:54 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Eastern, TN
Posts: 1,236
|
First, clearing your house yourself is not the greatest idea, and attempting to "detain" the intruder could be illegal in some areas, YMMV.
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska - |
October 6, 2010, 08:55 AM | #5 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Solo cuffing? Brrrr...
Sounds like the start of a wrasslin' match for your gun, and he has backup somewhere in your house? Are you sure you want to go there? |
October 6, 2010, 08:59 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
|
You could not pay me enough to get within arm's reach of a violent felon.
The beauty of the firearm is that it is a distance weapon. At contact range, the firearm loses its chief advantage -- that it allows the user to stay out of arm's reach. pax |
October 6, 2010, 09:05 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 4, 2010
Posts: 820
|
If I were breaking into someone's house and they tried to handcuff me, me knowing I had backup hidden in the house, all hell would break loose when the homeowner tried to put the cuffs on.
|
October 6, 2010, 09:05 AM | #8 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
If there is one thing that the force-on-force training I've done has impressed upon me, it is that clearing a house is a real good way to get shot. One person clearing a house with 2 intruders and the odds go way up - especially if those guys are looking for confrontation (and the fact that they have broken into your occupied dwelling suggests they may not be shy about it).
I think my first thought would be to fort up, not clear the house. If I did get into the unenviable position of having to detain one intruder while another was still free, I think the best strategy is to look for a position of cover where I've got my back to wall and some cover in front of me and hold them at gunpoint. There just aren't a lot of good options there - which is why I wouldn't be clearing the house in the first place if I didn't absolutely have to. |
October 6, 2010, 09:07 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 6, 2008
Location: N.California
Posts: 408
|
Clearing the house
I assume that if I'm home and someone forced their way into my house then they most likely intend to harm me and my family. If I come out of my bedroom and a BG isn't doing his very best to get to the nearest exit, well he's having a very bad day. I have no intention of trying to arrest anyone inside my home.
|
October 6, 2010, 09:36 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
|
Wow, there's a lot of negative feedback! Let me explain. First, if I'm home alone and heard something, I'd call the police and wait in my room. No need to play the hero. I'd only clear the house if my kids were home. Maybe I should've stated this in the original post, but my son's room is in the front of the house and mine is in the rear. I can't secure myself in my room and hope all goes well for him. I HAVE to do it if my kids are home. Second, I know the proper way to cuff someone as safe as possible. It is a distance weapon, and getting to close to your adversary does put you in a bad spot. That's why you make them lay on the floor on therir stomach with their arms extended before you even approach. I of course would call the police and if I thought the person was alone, I wouldn't even bother with the cuffs, I'd just await for the police to arrive. If I hear another person in the house though, what should I do then? Hope BG #2 doesn't find his way to my daughter's room? Turn my back on BG#1? Does anyone agree with what I'm saying?
|
October 6, 2010, 09:44 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Posts: 35
|
two words
Castle Doctrine
Ohio has adopted this and I certainly would not attempt to detain the individual. Multiple assailants increases propensity of harm to myself and family. I would take the appropriate measures necessary to protect my family first. |
October 6, 2010, 09:50 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
|
Thank you Blanks. I'm not trying to John Wayne by detaining someone, but what's the alternative?
|
October 6, 2010, 10:00 AM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
Quote:
I'm not a cop. I don't have handcuffs. I don't know how to tie people up, nor do I care to learn. I don't always know where my duct tape is anyway. I guess if the guy just drops to the floor on his own, I'll have to deal with that in a non-lethal manner. But I don't see this happening unless you command someone to do this. |
|
October 6, 2010, 10:19 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
|
I hear you Skans, and that's kind of what this thread is asking. I wouldn't have cukks if I were in a different line of work. The question remains "what do you do if you have the guy stopped and you hear a second guy?" I don't want to turn my back on the guy I've stopped and I can't ignore the second. I'm sure this scenario has happened a time or two before and things never play out the way they do in the movies.
|
October 6, 2010, 10:45 AM | #15 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
"What if I paint myself into a corner I can't get out of?"
I think that I would hope that this scenario never happens. You approach Guy #1 to cuff him. (Do you hang up on 911? Re-holster? Hold the phone in your teeth?) Guy #1 makes a play for your gun and yells for help. Guy #2 shows up and now you're on the bottom of a three-man pigpile with a loose gun somewhere in there. Now what? |
October 6, 2010, 10:54 AM | #16 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
I simply can not imagine a circumstance wherein I would attempt to physically detain an intruder.
Assuming that I absolutely MUST clear the house, I would be much more likely to tell the guy to LEAVE. Two guys break into a house, the odds are high that if one of them gets into a jam then the other is going to help. He's not very likely to just hide and wait for you. Anyway, my instruction is more likely to be "Get out of here now!!" rather than "Get on the ground!" "Get on the ground!", is for cops.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
October 6, 2010, 11:03 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
|
That's a possible scenario, sure. What about this one: I make #1 lay on the floor as I call the police, holster, speakerphone, kneel on #1's back, cuff him, search out #2, hold him at bay until police arrive. Ideally, that's how I would intend for it to play out if there are 2 assailants. I know there are lot of variables and ways things could go wrong, but I could also see how things could go wrong if I did things differently too. What would be a better alternative than my scenario? If anyone has a safer plan, I want to hear it and it will become my new plan.
|
October 6, 2010, 11:13 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
|
That though had occurred to me as well Pete. My problem with that is, "how do I know he'll really leave?" If his partner is still in the house and I make him leave, might he exit my front door, run around the back and remain a very real threat? He'd be less of one cuffed. Let me make one thing clear, this isn't something I'd be comfortable doing and I've put cuffs on a lot of people. I would only resort to this if there were 2 people involved.
|
October 6, 2010, 11:20 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2009
Posts: 506
|
Quote:
Suppose he resists being cuffed, and he's too much for you. Now you have to shoot him anyway, but it's no longer self defence - he's just trying to escape and you're shooting him. It might be legal, but you might have some explaining to do having shot someone in the back at point blank range. A gun is not a magical cooperation-inducing wand. It doesn't put you in control - it just gives you the option of killing the other guy. You can't necessarily use a gun to make someone else do what you want. What if they simply say "no, make me"? |
|
October 6, 2010, 11:25 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2001
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 1,521
|
Quote:
Cheers. Bob James
__________________
"...A humble and contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise." Ps. li "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." —Frederic Bastiat |
|
October 6, 2010, 11:27 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2008
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 393
|
Point taken Divil. However, as previously stated, what if he goes but doesn't stay gone? Second, if he's alone and I have the drop on him, I'm calling the police. I'll tell him not to move until the police arrive. If he does run away, of course I'll let him leave, but I'm not telling him to leave. If I have the choice, I'd rather see him in jail.
|
October 6, 2010, 11:30 AM | #22 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
The BGs don't share your plan. The odds of getting ambushed/attacked are impossibly high. You don't have backup and Mr BG knows it. He also knows that he DOES have back up and he likely trusts that backup or he wouldn't be doing robberies with him. The absolute last thing you should be doing is trying to cuff the bad guy. No way, no how. If you want to yell for him to get on the ground, fine. I still think it's a bad idea but do what you want. Assuming he doesn't have a visible weapon, I would tell him to leave. If he leaves, great, if he doesn't, we're at a stalemate. I'm not shooting unless he's threatening. You can't go looking for his buddy unless he's gone or neutralized. Again, I can't imagine a scenario where I would try to physically detain a bad guy. No way.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
October 6, 2010, 11:32 AM | #23 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Quote:
|
|
October 6, 2010, 11:34 AM | #24 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
I think you are concentrating your energy in the wrong direction. Rather than think about how to get yourself out of a bad situation with no good solutions, I'd concentrate on figuring out how not to be in that situation.
I think Peetza has a good point that the goal here isn't really to detain bad guys, stop theft, or something similar. It is family safety. That is the primary goal and to the extent you are doing anything else, it should immediately serve that goal. |
October 6, 2010, 11:43 AM | #25 |
Staff
Join Date: November 23, 2005
Location: California - San Francisco
Posts: 9,471
|
As I see it, the OP has pretty much created a "no win" situation for himself. He has a BG down on the floor, but there's another one somewhere in the house. In addition he apparently has two kids in different rooms elsewhere in the house. So what are some of the bad things that can happen.
[1] BG 1 resists as the OP approaches and attempts to secure him. And BG 2 is still somewhere in the house with the kids unprotected as the OP and BG 1 struggle. [2] BG 2 ambushes and knocks out or otherwise incapacitates OP as OP is holding or attempting to secure BG 1. Now BG 1 and BG 2 have free reign of the house with the kids unprotected. [3] While OP is busy with BG 1, BG 2 finds and gets the kids, and maybe uses them as hostages or a diversion. It's pretty hard to figure a way to make anything good come out of trying to hold on to BG 1 while BG 2 is somewhere in the house. A lot of course will depend on exactly how the house is laid out and exactly how the event unfolds. But my approach would be to forget about engaging a BG. As I see it, my first order of business would be to round up the kids, and any other authorized persons in the house and get everyone together in a reasonably defensible place of safety -- and call 911. As I see it, my primary job is to protect the innocents in the house and not necessarily to deal with the BGs. |
|
|