June 7, 2011, 06:36 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 56
|
Home search?
I've read a few times in the past that ATF has the "right" to search your home if you have a registered Title II firearm/etc. as a private individual. Two questions:
1. Is it true? Have you somehow given up your 4th amendment rights once you legally own a T2 item? 2. Whether true or not, are there any cases on record where a search of a private residence by ATF was conducted simply due to having possession of a T2 item? Thanks! Ryan |
June 7, 2011, 08:44 PM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
It is not true. No one gives up any rights by virtue of owning a registered a Title II firearm. A search would come under the same rules as any home search. Of course, owning an unregistered Title II firearn would come under the same rules as possessing any other contraband (illegal drugs, etc.).
I know of no case where BATFE or any other LE agency searched a home solely because the occupant had a registered Title II firearm. FWIW, I owned a half dozen machineguns/submachineguns for over 40 years and the only contact I ever had with BATFE was to send them a change of address. MD state requires an annual registration, which is a PITA, but other than that, I never heard from the State Police either. There have been a few cases where police/feds raided a home because of a false report of possession of illegal arms or explosives, the infamous Ballew case being the worst. At one time BATFE "cowboys" seemed to like to raid homes more or less for the fun of it, and on almost any pretext. I believe (or maybe would like to believe) that things have changed. But still I know of no case where registered Title II firearms were involved. Jim |
June 7, 2011, 09:00 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 502
|
is it still there
Is there still a 4Th amendment? Been to the airport lately?
bb |
June 7, 2011, 10:13 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 21, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 727
|
The only thing I know of in which you give up that right is if you have an FFL.
|
June 7, 2011, 10:53 PM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: February 20, 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Non-FFL firearm owners (including Title II firearms) are still protected by the 4th amendment. Probable cause is required for a search warrant. Even then, the ATF/AUSA will sometimes screw that up by not being specific in their warrants (these warrants can usually get tossed). |
|
June 7, 2011, 11:43 PM | #6 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,084
|
Quote:
An ATF compliance inspection is not a search and is limited to the licensees bound book, 4473's, Multiple Sale of Handgun reports and his firearm inventory. It IS NOT a search but an inspection. The IOI cannot go and search your sock drawer, your doghouse or your daughters closet. They sit down at your dining table and compare the bound book vs 4473's vs your inventory. That's it. If you ARE served with a search warrant it is because probable cause was presented to a judge who signed for it.
__________________
Need a FFL in Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me. $20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military,police,fire or schoolteachers) Plano, Texas...........the Gun Nut Capitol of Gun Culture, USA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pELwCqz2JfE |
||
June 8, 2011, 09:55 AM | #7 | ||
Member
Join Date: February 20, 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
However, 18 USC Section 923(g)(1)(A) states, in pertinent part: Quote:
|
||
June 8, 2011, 11:31 AM | #8 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
BATFE can inspect the business premises of an FFL 01 dealer to ensure that all the guns on the premises are properly recorded or are exempt for some reason (e.g., personal property of the dealer). The justification is the need to ensure proper record keeping and that a dealer is not buying and selling "off the book", or "leaking" inventory through illegal sales, carelessness, or theft. That, IMHO, is a very good reason NOT to have business premises in the home or at least to keep the business area separate from the living area. Otherwise, the "sock drawer" could be subject to inspection if the dealer keeps part of his inventory in his bedroom. (Yes, I know dealers who do just that!)
That is not the case with a C&R FFL. Since it is presumed that the C&R licensee has no "business premises" (for his collecting activity) and that he carries out that activity in his home, BATFE is limited to inspecting his book and if the licensee chooses that can be done at the BATFE office, not at the collector's home. But even for a C&R FFL, if there is cause to believe there is some illegal activity, like illegal dealing, a warrant can be obtained to search the house. Jim |
June 10, 2011, 11:02 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,033
|
I have owned machine guns since 1963 and I have NEVER had BATFE come to look at them. I was an FFL holder for many years, and they DID come and inspect my books from time to time but never, ever did they ask about any of the machine guns, SBS, or SBR I personally owned.
|
June 11, 2011, 11:00 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
You give up no rights to BATFE by owning a registered weapon. That myth has been floating around for decades, and knowledegable folks have been debunking it for decades.
|
June 11, 2011, 11:20 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 56
|
thanks all, now i know i can debunk when i hear it.
Ryan |
June 13, 2011, 10:39 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: June 1, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 31
|
Do more than that...buy something title II and know what the facts are...besides, these are just fun to own.
|
|
|