November 16, 2012, 12:28 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Posts: 5
|
22 cal power
So if I can pump 3 or more shots into an intruder with my 22 pistol at point blank range is this as potent as one shot from a 9mm or 45?
|
November 16, 2012, 12:34 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 7, 2009
Posts: 995
|
I don't know. But B4 you hammer the BG the 4th time you might want to ask him so then we will all know.
|
November 16, 2012, 12:41 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Posts: 1,229
|
The 22 lacks the power to immediately stop an attack. If you use a 22 for defense, you run the risk of getting shot before the threat has been eliminated. The larger centerfire rounds have a much better chance of giving you that quick, ultimate knock down power. Im not saying that you cant defend yourself with a 22, but you stand much better odds with something more powerful. If a 22 is all you have, by all means, use it. But if you have something, anything more powerful than a .25ACP, use that instead.
|
November 16, 2012, 02:02 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
But let's pretend that this ratio is accurate and that three shots from a .22 is the same as one shot from a 9mm. That would mean that to equal the capacity of a Glock 19 you would need a .22 pistol with a 45-round magazine. Also, I think the goal of any self-defense shooting should be to put two or three rounds into the center mass of your attacker as quickly as possible. If we keep using our ratio, that means you'll be using up to nine rounds per attacker with a .22, and most .22 pistols only hold ten rounds. A .22 is not a self-defense round. Sure, it can cause wounds that can eventually be lethal, and it can even stop the threat immediately in some cases; but compared to a 9mm, .40, or .45 it is extremely deficient at immediately stopping a threat.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
November 16, 2012, 10:23 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
+1 Theohazard. In addition...
Choosing a self-defense or home-defense weapon is all about compromise. A .22LR handgun IMHO does not measure up to a 9mm or .45ACP handgun, but then again, none of the above will measure up to a 12ga shotgun, a .44Mag lever rifle, or a .223/5.56 carbine. However, a .22LR pistol is far better than nothing at all. Gun forums are rife with attempts to conjure up some sort of "magic factor" to equalize broadly differing firearms. Many of these discussions begin to border on the absurd if they continue long enough. There is no magic equalizing factor. The question is what compromises YOU are willing to accept. That being said... IMHO the main advantage of .22LR for SD is that it will fit into extremely small pocket-sized "mouse guns" like the Beretta 21 or Taurus PT-22. However, as the gun gets larger, .22LR pistols are at a capacity disadvantage because it is inherently difficult to stack rimmed .22LR cartridges in a magazine that will fit inside a pistol grip. Consequently, as the gun approaches even so-called "compact" size, you'll encounter numerous 9mm models that hold 12-14rds- more than virtually any .22LR pistol on the market. At this point, there is little reason to choose .22LR unless the shooter is very recoil-sensitive and/or has an extremely limited ammo budget.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
November 16, 2012, 10:42 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
The first big problem with .22 LR is penetration. Especially when fired from a short barreled pistol. Even if you hit the right spot, it might not penetrate deep enough to do the damage you need it to.
The second big problem is reliable feeding in an automatic. Rimmed cartridges can get stuck on each other easily and cause "rim lock". Which can cause a malfunction. Heavy clothing, wierd angles, large body can cause a failure to stop with any caliber, but with the .22 LR at the low velocity it will achieve when fired out of a handgun increases those chances even further. Really, when you are using a .22 LR, you are making a gamble that whoever you are shooting doesn't want to get shot, and the threat of or actually being shot will stop the agression. (That is probably a pretty good gamble honestly) That being said, if that is all you can afford/manage, then it is better than cussing.
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
November 16, 2012, 10:59 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 908
|
^I have cussed 5 guys out of my front door at 5 in the morning. There had been a conflict at a party next door and these guys had come back a couple hours after the party ended to jump these people in their beds or something.
I am not a big guy. But I stood my ground started yelling about how they had broken into the wrong house and to look around and see that they had kicked their way into the wrong house. They backed out the door. Cops called and they arrested 3 of them. Needless to say, I started keeping a loaded 12 gauge shotgun. |
November 16, 2012, 11:13 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,786
|
alex0535, I am glad that you got out of that OK but I still feel safer being a mediocre shot than a prolific cusser.
A large majority of people can find a 9 mm pistol that they can shoot accurately, comfortably, and rapidly. A .22LR pistol certainly can be effective, but a person has to be much more skillful, with a measure of luck thrown in, to be as effective as the same person with a center fire pistol. If you are going to use a .22LR, you should probably fire until empty and look for an opportunity for a head shot somewhere along the way. Absolute answer to your 3-to-1 question would depend on placement. CNS shots: probably yes. COM shots: probably no, at least with regards to immediate incapacitation of an assailant. |
November 16, 2012, 11:25 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2007
Location: "Undisclosed Bunker"
Posts: 1,464
|
Bottom line is I would not deploy a .22lr (and I love the caliber) for HD/SD. Perhaps as a BUG but now the .380's are small enough to render the old Bobcats/Pt22/25's etc. tactically inferior IMO.
Now, if a 10/22 were to be used as a HD choice I would have much more faith in the .22lr but still would not opt for it as my first choice.
__________________
NRA Life Member “A free people ought...to be armed..." ―George Washington |
November 16, 2012, 11:40 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,963
|
Yes, your .22 will work fine- as long as it's reliable and you do your part. A bigger caliber will give you a slight advantage. People have been effectively using .22s for defense for over 100 years.
|
November 16, 2012, 01:58 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2011
Posts: 540
|
Quote:
The .22 is much less than adequate and the centerfire service calibers (9mm - .45ACP) are much better options for so many reasons.
__________________
QUANTITATIVE AMMUNITION SELECTION |
|
November 16, 2012, 03:48 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Location: Viera, Florida
Posts: 1,339
|
At my father-in-law's farm, I once shot a 60 lb sow right between the eyes with a Ruger .22 pistol loaded with high-speed HPs. The bullet bounced off. I could hear it whistle as it tumbled end-over-end out into the corn field.
She squealed and ran a few feet, then shook it off and went back to eating. I shot her twice through the lungs. She didn't seem to mind very much. Finally, I got a slug into the back of the skull and she went down. Needless to say, I don't think much of the .22 as a SD cartridge. |
November 16, 2012, 06:35 PM | #13 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
||
November 16, 2012, 06:57 PM | #14 | |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Quote:
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
|
November 16, 2012, 06:57 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2012
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 4,594
|
Some points:
The front of a pig skull is very thick... Lung shots are ineffective in general... The CCI velocitors can penetrate 15 inches in ballistics medium from a Ruger SR22 pistol. From the tests people have posted online. A 22 is not the best defensive round, but if it hits something important it will do the job. More rounds doesn't really mean much, though it will cause more pain as the count rises, which may stop a threat. It also increases your chances of hitting something important, but this is true of all calibers. As was said, it beats having nothing at all, but there are better round choices, and they offer distinct advantages. |
November 16, 2012, 07:10 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2004
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 1,528
|
I have put down a lot of whitetail deer with my little NAA 22lr. Head shots of course either on car/deer collisions or final hunting shots. I generally carry it everywhere loaded with hyper velocity yellow jacket.
|
November 16, 2012, 07:18 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
No.
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
November 16, 2012, 08:47 PM | #18 |
Junior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Posts: 5
|
Thanks to all for your responses.
I actually posted this to get your opinions for my daughter. She is dead set in her belief that a 22 is all she needs for protection. She cites numerous statistics about how the 22 kills more people every year than any other round. I can't get her to move up to even a .380. Try as I might, I can't make her understand that only a head shot from a 22 will instantly incapacitate an offender, and under the stress of being attacked she would be lucky to get one. Now she's a great shot with her pistol on the range. She can reliably bust up the heads of her targets out to 25 feet. And she loves to prove it to me. But I can't make her see that shooting at moving targets under extreme stress is another matter. She can't bank on a head shot. She'd be blessed to get a body shot. And a 22 body shot may not stop a determined bad guy. "But dad, I've got 7 shots with my gun, I'll empty it in him." And I'd like to repute that argument, but I think that she probably could empty a whole clip into an intruder. She's a pretty cool customer. So again with the question I originally posted...would 3 or 4 shots from a 22 be as potent as 1 from a 9mm or 45? Is my sharp shooting daughter wrong? If she can reliably unload 7 shots on an undesirable is she "relatively" safe? Incidentally, I'm not as confident as she is. My home protection is a Mossberg 500 24" slug barrel loaded with quail shot, and my Ruger .223 Range Rifle. |
November 16, 2012, 08:52 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Location: Viera, Florida
Posts: 1,339
|
I guess I should have done a better job of explaining my point in the pig story, so here it is:
A hit between the eyes or through the lungs with a serious SD caliber would have done the trick on that little sow. I’ve shot much bigger pigs through the head with .357, .44 and .45 handguns and never had the slightest trouble with bullets bouncing off. The .22LR is a joke compared to a modern SD load in 9mm, .357, .40 or .45. Will it kill? Yeah. The question is, what will the BG be doing to you while you’re waiting for him to die? |
November 16, 2012, 09:04 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2012
Posts: 1,078
|
Quote:
Then tell her to make her eyeball shot. Assuming that doesn't convince her. Let her shoot again, but right as she is getting ready to shoot. Scream really loud or use an air horn, something to startle her. But be ready to keep the gun pointed down range if she jumps and tries to turn. Lastly. Ask her, if the .22 LR is as useful as she is thinking it is, why it isn't used by police/military all over the world as a defensive weapon. Because nothing is a cheap or easy to shoot as a .22 LR so why not use it.
__________________
I am no longer participating in gun forums. Good luck. |
|
November 16, 2012, 09:10 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2004
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 1,528
|
Good point. The OP answere is .....NO. The 22lr is a terrible primary defence round. A pencil behind the ear will kill but unless your daughter has special forces training and is able to precisely make a head shot under diress, a 22lr is gonna **** off the bad guy and could escalate his intentions. A burglary could easily escalate into a murder. Tell your daughter more people are statistically killed with a car. Either carry a proper caliber starting at a 380acp and get serious with firearm expectations or carry a can of bear mace.
|
November 16, 2012, 09:35 PM | #22 | |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Quote:
380 95 gr FMJ bullet 155 ft lbs per hit. 38 spcl, 158 gr FMJ bullet 158 gr 200 ft lbs per hit 9MM 124 gr FMJ bullet 351 ft lbs per hit 45 ACP 230 gr FMJ bullet 365 ft lbs per hit Additional hits with a 22 do not equate to a single hit from a single larger caliber bullet except for making more holes to bleed out of. Waiting for a bad guy to bleed out is not conducive to the welfare of his intended victim. A 38 spcl with a good defensive round in it will beat the number I posted and would be the minimum I would feel comfortable with.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- Last edited by Old Grump; November 17, 2012 at 11:30 AM. |
|
November 16, 2012, 09:39 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2007
Location: "Undisclosed Bunker"
Posts: 1,464
|
Internet "Folklore"
Quote:
But I have to say that there is absolutely no empirical data available for the continued "old-wives-tale" and seemingly perpetual myth that the .22lr caliber is responsible for more (recorded) deaths than any other caliber. Again I ask (plead) for a LINK to the empirical data that speaks to such. I, and as far as I know at least up until now, no one, has been able to produce said data--it's my belief that's because it's not true. I get where the "belief" comes from in that the .22lr is very $cheap$ in all respects from the guns to ammo and, hence, it's quite popular in the inner-cities where the crime rates are "Beirut" like sky-rocketing (no, I don't buy the Feds stats that purport otherwise anymore than I buy their "shrinking unemployment" data). Sorry if I went off on a tangent but I would really like to see the data that proves me wrong--otherwise it's time we put the "myth" to bed, if you will. -Cheers
__________________
NRA Life Member “A free people ought...to be armed..." ―George Washington Last edited by PT-92; November 16, 2012 at 09:44 PM. Reason: spell |
|
November 16, 2012, 09:51 PM | #24 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 27, 2010
Posts: 553
|
Quote:
Quote:
Haven't we all been down this road recently: A woman likes a certain type of gun, but the man in her life says it's no good. A woman can shoot a gun well, but according to her father/husband/boyfriend, she'd be better off with what he believes is a better option. Where's that Cornered Cat everyone calls when these threads pop up. Let her shoot what she wants to shoot, choose what fits her best, and shoot what she can handle best. Then buy yourselves matching guns. http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...+wife+daughter http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...+wife+daughter http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...best+gun+woman
__________________
Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable." -Sydney J. Harris |
||
November 16, 2012, 10:04 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2011
Posts: 654
|
The big advantage of the 22 cal handgun is accuracy due to minimal recoil. Everyone's heard of the case of the South Carolina state trooper who shot a perp 6 times, 357 Magnum 158 gr hollow-point rounds, 5 hits center mass, afterwards the perp returned fire with a 22 cal NAA mousegun...hit the trooper in the heart, the trooper collapsed and died at the scene. Or how about the perp in Colorado Springs who shot 4 people in a bar and then 2 more at a convenience store with a 22 cal Ruger. All were knocked down instantly, 5 died immediately, one survived, but suffered amnesia. I can go on and on. Police tell me the shell casings they find most often at crime scenes are 22 cal.
If the young lady can shoot, with a 22 cal handgun she has a fighting chance. For Christmas, surprise her with a Sig 238. Women shoot the 238 really well. Good luck.
__________________
For 20 years the sea was my home, always recall the sun going down, and my trusty friend, a 1911 pistol, strapped to my side. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|