The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 25, 1998, 03:21 PM   #1
Steve Koski
Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 1998
Location: Spanish Fork UT, USA
Posts: 86
How are powder burn rates tested?

I was recently looking at a list of burn rates and it showed WSL (Winchester Super Light) right next to Unique. According to my manuals WSL loads require less powder and can't achieve the same velocities as Unique. They don't seem very similar yet they are neighbors on the burn rate list.
Steve Koski is offline  
Old November 26, 1998, 03:53 AM   #2
Walt Welch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 3, 1998
Location: Alamo, CA
Posts: 424
Steve; burn rate charts are notoriously misleading. Powders perform differently in different size cases and at different pressures. Use a burn rate chart as a very rough gauge only.

Another misconception is that shorter bbls. require faster burning powders for best results. Not true. It is true that more of the fast burning powder will be burned, but the best ballistics are from the charges listed as having the maximum ballistics, usually slow powders. For example, a 3" .357 Mag will work fine with Unique or a similar reasonably fast powder, but best ballistics are obtained with H-110 or W-296, slow powders.

Hope this helps, Walt
Walt Welch is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03747 seconds with 10 queries