The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 13, 2011, 01:46 PM   #1
vfRVco
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8
Load reco's .38spl & .45acp

Can someone suggest starting loads using Bullseye for the following bullets?

1. Berry's 158gr jacketed flat point (box also says DS)

2. Remington 230gr FMJ-RN

Can't seem to find load data for these exact bullets in the guides I have. Thanks.
vfRVco is offline  
Old August 13, 2011, 01:55 PM   #2
Ozzieman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
For the Berry's 158gr since it’s a plated bullet use the same load as a lead bullet.

For the 45 ACP 230 you can find loads at the following sites, just use the same load as listed by weight and type (lead or jacketed)and don’t worry about manufacture. Start on the low side and work up.
http://www.alliantpowder.com/reloaders/default.aspx

http://data.hodgdon.com/main_menu.asp
Ozzieman is offline  
Old August 14, 2011, 05:49 AM   #3
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
The 158g = not much; use cast lead data.

The 230g = 4.6g.
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old August 14, 2011, 06:25 AM   #4
PawPaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Central Louisiana
Posts: 3,137
Bullseye for many years was considered THE target powder for the .45 ACP and almost everyone who loads a 230 grain bullet uses 4.6 grains of bullseye under that bullet. I've got one powder measure dedicated to the load.

For the .38 special, I've long used 2.7 grains of Bullseye under a 148 grain wadcutter for target work.
__________________
Dennis Dezendorf

http://pawpawshouse.blogspot.com
PawPaw is offline  
Old August 14, 2011, 10:00 AM   #5
overkill0084
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2010
Location: Northern, UT
Posts: 1,162
.38- I settled on 3.1 gr BE w/ a 158 gr cast SWC. I would start around 2.7 and see what works best.
.45- 4.6 gr of BE is my default w/ cast 230 gr bullets. IIRC, I started at around 4.2 during testing. 5.0 gr w/ a 230 FMJ was the go-to load for mil spec ammo for a few decades, so you could do worse.

Sounds like you could use more data.
__________________
Cheers,
Greg
“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child – miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.” — P.J. O’Rourke
overkill0084 is offline  
Old August 15, 2011, 12:03 PM   #6
vfRVco
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8
Thanks

Thank to everyone for their input.

The Alliant guide states max charge of 3.5g of Bullseye for a Speer LSWC 158g. If I start about -10% that's about 3.1 so I'll try that range.

Also says max charge of 5.7g of BE for a Speer 230g TMJ RN (same as FMJ?) - seems high given your comments. Lee says max 5.0g of BE for a 230g jacketed bullet. -10% brings me down to the 4.5-4.6 range you guys reco. Is Alliant just wrong?
vfRVco is offline  
Old August 15, 2011, 04:41 PM   #7
Super Sneaky Steve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,250
Berry's says to use low to midrange jacketed data.
http://www.berrysmfg.com/faq-q9-c1-H...d_Bullets.aspx

I used 3.7grains of Bullseye behind my 158 grain round nose bullets and it works great.
Super Sneaky Steve is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04856 seconds with 10 queries