February 2, 2008, 07:49 AM | #101 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Posts: 1,784
|
Quote:
One thing some may ask is "how is it you profess to love a true DA pistol when you are a proponent of 1911s?" Well, I took Andy Stanford's Surgical Speed Shooting class with my P226. I was superb on the first day and the second day he challenged me to use the DA. I struggled. But he challenged me to master the pull and I dry fired that pistol 200 times per night for a month. So, long story short I'm pretty good with that P226 (the DA trigger is very smooth now) and the transition isn't bad at all. In fact, those who have them should send them to Sig to have the Short RESET Trigger installed. The reset is shorter than that of a Glock! Even so, a Glock, M&P, XD and/or 1911 is quicker than the Sig or HK45 even if only slightly. Hint: Pull the DA trigger smoothly. Sounds easy; not easy to accomplish. So think of it this way: pull it smoothly as if you were rowing a boat. Go slowly intially. Once you can do it slowly pick up the rate in which you can maintain that level of smoothness. It will come quickly, albeit with a lot of work input. Thus, I can/you can pick up the HK45/P30/P22x with it's heavy DA trigger, draw, get on the trigger and have a nice break with a very quick and accurate series of follow upshots. Quote:
If anyone's interested...
__________________
"Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves." ~ William Pitt, 1783 |
||
February 2, 2008, 09:34 AM | #102 |
Member
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Location: south
Posts: 79
|
Consider S&W
The decock safety you like so much does exist in several pistols. It's called traditional double action and exist on quite a few mdls and makes. For customer service and several options look at Smith and Wesson. They have a Plethora of pistol's that will fit any need you like. The even will add a manual safety to their striker fired M&P's if you prefer it.
__________________
FREEDOM IS NEVER FREE |
February 3, 2008, 09:59 PM | #103 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
Thanks for the info Chui. So many cool guns, so EXPENSIVE..
I definitely understand your comments about mastering DA. I actually learned to shoot while shooting DA with S&W revolvers. I was a senior in HS and I learned while being enrolled in shooting courses at a local PD academy through my Law Enforcement Class. We shot the armory Model 19 S&W's that had a real smooth DA pull after probably thousands upon thousands of rounds that had been put through them. The point though is that even while shooting bullseye, we always had to use DA, and I think it was indispensable for learning how to master trigger control, and learning how to properly prep the DA trigger when shooting either fast, or for bullseye. Having said that, I definitely prefer SA (or even a consistent striker type trigger) in semi autos, as I find that it is a lot easier for me to train using only one type of trigger pull. |
February 3, 2008, 10:12 PM | #104 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2004
Posts: 1,682
|
Quote:
__________________
All I ever seem to read on this Internet is a bunch of "I heard..." or "I read..." sort of stuff. "One test = 1,000 expert opinions." -Art Eatman |
|
February 4, 2008, 05:07 PM | #105 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Southwest US
Posts: 277
|
I was hoping to post a photo and range report for my new 1911 today, but that will not be happening. I ordered a PT1911SS from BudsGunShop.com - just before they dropped the price by $50 . On Friday, the gun was delivered to the FFL who had agreed to do the transfer.
Unfortunately I have not been able to contact the FFL. So I have no idea when I'll be able to pick it up... |
February 4, 2008, 07:36 PM | #106 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
Quote:
|
|
February 5, 2008, 12:42 PM | #107 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2004
Posts: 1,682
|
Quote:
__________________
All I ever seem to read on this Internet is a bunch of "I heard..." or "I read..." sort of stuff. "One test = 1,000 expert opinions." -Art Eatman |
|
February 5, 2008, 02:59 PM | #108 |
Member
Join Date: October 28, 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 29
|
A LEO buddy of mine told me recently that his department switched for the USP .45 to the Glock 21. They loved the USP but HK made their armorer go to an HK class every year at a cost of about 3K. He said HK would not sell them any parts unless they attended the class. I asked him why they just didn't buy their parts from a supplying dealer and he said it was hard too because HK those dealers if they sold directly to LEO. I find this a little hard to believe. Anyone else heard of anything like this?
|
February 5, 2008, 04:51 PM | #109 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Posts: 1,784
|
H&K components are hard to come by... I once worked with the largest HK dealer in MI and while I cannot vouch for your story the parts WERE few and far between.
__________________
"Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves." ~ William Pitt, 1783 |
February 5, 2008, 05:17 PM | #110 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Southwest US
Posts: 277
|
Not to interrupt the side discussion, but... it seems my gun is, err, missing...
Edit: found in the custody of the post office. Whew! Last edited by nobody_special; February 5, 2008 at 11:19 PM. |
February 5, 2008, 11:38 PM | #111 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
Quote:
Are you in So. CA? |
|
February 6, 2008, 01:11 PM | #112 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 22, 2004
Posts: 1,682
|
Quote:
__________________
All I ever seem to read on this Internet is a bunch of "I heard..." or "I read..." sort of stuff. "One test = 1,000 expert opinions." -Art Eatman |
|
February 6, 2008, 06:05 PM | #113 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2005
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 262
|
well, you have to understand that, when considering a firearm for hd/sd duty, the only things that really matter are reliability, reasonable accuracy and personal comfort, or "feel." everything else is secondary. I've owned and carried revolvers, a Norinco 1911, Glocks 30, 23, 27 and 32, a Ruger P97, Kel-Tec P11, S&w 3913, HK USPc and several others. While I have total confidence in the Glocks (and I was especially fond of the models 30 and 32), I had no problem carrying the Ruger. I found it to be amazingly accurate and totally reliable, lacking only in the "cachet" of a more snobbish brand name. The Norinco? Roughly made, with visible tooling marks inside the slide, small sights, average blueing at best, but it went bang every time. The Kel-Tec was obviously a budget handgun, but also had no reliability issues, i just did not like the long, heavy DAO trigger pull for each shot. Great concealment pistol, though. For me, though, the USPc was my fave. i carried mine every day for years until i (stupidly) sold it. After almost 4 years of daily concealed carry, the finish was just starting to show its first signs of slight wear around the forward edgs of the slide. it was accurate, it was reliable, it fit me perfectly and i will get another one as soon as my budget allows, but until then, my ruger and my glock will do just fine.
|
February 6, 2008, 06:11 PM | #114 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 1, 2008
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
The safety switch on the P30 and P45 are the same as any revolver or Glock, your finger. That means if you touch the trigger you will have to accept the fact that your gun will fire. That being said, a Glock with a round chambered is much more likely to ND and probably somewhat dangerous in that aspect. Take the P30 or P45 and pull the trigger back, it's a long hard trigger pull that takes effort. Now, when you do that with a glock there is not much resistance (5lb trigger weight). Both would be super reliable, shoot anything out of the chamber, and great guns. I just put a deposit on a HK P30 and I own a Glock17. I was looking for something more compact than the 17 and they showed me a P30. As soon as I held it, I wanted it. I had my mind set on a G19 but they happen to have sold them. I held and checked out a sig, a S&W M&P, and a Springfield XD. All great weapons, but the 2 I liked most was Glock and HK. Now do note I was looking at 9mm and compact guns. After holding a G23 then a P30 it just felt better to me. Looked more agressive (hey I'm superficial sometimes too) and although expensive I knew it was an HK. Something about holding an HK feels good to me. People like the HK because of the name. HK has been in military and special forces service for a long time. It's trusted and tested. As with Glocks, they are rugged weapons that won't fail when you need them to function. The price comes with the name and craftsmanship. Glocks are cheaper by comparison because they are a much simpler design with fewer moving parts that can fail. With an HK you have a more complicated system, but still relatively easy to maintain. When you start talking about 1911s they really take attention to detail to get continuous operation in the field. Still, it's hard to find a more accurate pistol than a quality 1911. So it's up to you. If you want something rugged that will fire just about any ammunition you feed it a HK will do it. You want a reliable weapon provided you keep up with maintenance (as you should with any gun) and one that will be super accurate then a 1911 is nice. |
|
February 6, 2008, 07:44 PM | #115 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
Quote:
But back to the conversation. I have the USP base covered, and a G17, now I need to work on getting a superb 1911!...and maybe an HK45..and a P30... |
|
February 6, 2008, 08:22 PM | #116 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 1, 2008
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
|
|
February 6, 2008, 09:20 PM | #117 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 15, 2007
Posts: 1,855
|
yeah! the LOTTO! I gotta start playin' that sucka!
|
February 7, 2008, 10:30 PM | #118 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
Quote:
Jason |
||
|
|