|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 10, 2012, 01:09 AM | #1 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
1988 All Over Again - 3D printers
No, I'm not talking about Rick Astley or Perestroika. I'm talking about the Undetectable Firearms Act. The late 1980's were scary times. Full House was in its second season, Miami Vice was really getting stale, and the Austrians were making plastic guns, which as we all know, go right through airport metal detectors without a peep.
(OK, you might have to remove a few parts to do it. OK, you might have to remove almost all the parts to do it, but stop dragging us all down with reality. People are trying to panic, here.) The ban expired in 1998, but the threat remained, so President Bush signed it back into law in 2003. It's in effect until next year. That is, unless Representative Steve Israel gets his way. He's an A+ booster for the Brady Campaign, and he's got to do something to prove he's still one of the true believers, so he's trying to demonize 3d printing. At least two folks have made functional (but fragile) AR-15 lowers using the new machinery, and it looks like Israel's trying to work a ban on that into a proposed renewal of the UFA. This is worth keeping an eye on. With the exception of making NFA items or cloning guns banned from import, the Gun Control Act does not prohibit someone from making their own gun. I expect to see some sort of attempt to generate paranoia about that in the media as the anti-gunners continue to grasp at straws.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
December 10, 2012, 09:10 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Oh, so that one got to GWB's desk? Good thing the AWB didn't.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
December 10, 2012, 02:09 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 610
|
I don't see how this ban can feasably work. There are already several polymer receivers for a wide variety of guns out there and even polymer FCGs. And guns with those features are far from undetectable.
I just don't see how 3D printing can be specifically singled out for a ban. In order for this to work they would have to completely ban either polymer parts for firearms or private manufacture of guns. Neither of which is going to happen without a hell of a lot of resistance from gun rights groups. |
December 10, 2012, 07:28 PM | #4 |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
I doubt they are trying to write a feasible ban. In fact, I imagine they will write one that is nigh-impossible to enforce or implement. I suspect the main purpose of said legislation will be to demonize those who oppose it as supporting the ownership of invisible, undetectable assault weapon baby killers by violent felons.
They'll rely on the old trick of a soundbite that sounds horrible to the average person but that requires a 30 minute dissertation by someone knowledgable in order to understand how stupid the soundbite is. |
December 10, 2012, 08:08 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 779
|
Like all of these laws, it'll be more in spirit than practicality. Then after one bad incident happens, they'll point to the law and strengthen it. It's not going to be bad, just a slippery slope of controlling the means of production.
__________________
I told the new me, "Meet me at the bus station and hold a sign that reads: 'Today is the first day of the rest of your life.'" But the old me met me with a sign that read: "Welcome back." Who you are is not a function of where you are. -Off Minor |
April 25, 2013, 04:12 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Location: Saint Michael, MN
Posts: 47
|
As an update to this old thread: Rep Steve Israel, D-NY 3rd District introduced bill HR1474 that would ban so called undetectable firearms, home made firearms with non metallic receivers, and home made plastic magazines. Factory all plastic receivers, like some injection molded AR-15 receivers, and magazines are unaffected.
The law has not been updated to reflect the increased sensitivity of modern metal detectors, does not take into account modern screening processes and technologies like x-rays, and does not consider how unenforceable it is with modern $600 3D printers becoming more popular. Also many details of compliance are quite vague. By supporting home gun smiths the NRA could further discredit the ridiculous "industry shill" meme. The www.examiner.com and Forbes have good articles about it. Defence distributed's forum DefCAD has all of the details. More analysis from a group that worked with Israel to draft the bill: www.publicknowledge.org/blog Rep Israel's web page links to many articles about this issue. In 2003 it passed by a voice vote, and unanimous consent. It better not go that way this time. Edit: A new article by the examiner shows that plastic magazine manufactures would need to get a manufacturing FFL if the magazine body does not contain at least an once of steel. Rep Israel also proposed and then backed down from an internet crackdown to stop the proliferation of magazine CAD files. Last edited by dustind; April 25, 2013 at 04:53 PM. Reason: New information |
April 25, 2013, 09:04 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2012
Location: Sweet Home
Posts: 886
|
Quote:
You can make a functioning AR lower out of a block of wood or a hunk of plastic and an LPC. It will function for a little while anyway. I think these would be preferable to a 3D printer.
__________________
Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. |
|
April 26, 2013, 08:45 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
You can't have an issue if no one is talking about it.
|
November 14, 2013, 07:20 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,171
|
Plastic guns, and the "Invisible" gun law set to expire.
While I understand part of the fear, ultimately, it boils down to the fact that if someone wants to go into a school, court house, bank *Insert gun free zone here* with such a weapon, and attempt to murder someone or many people, they're not going to give a flying rats arse if there is a law stating that they can't have a gun made out of all plastic parts in the first place.
Classic gun grabbing hysteria hyping. Besides, these guns are single use only are they not? Any more than one round and the handgun would be more like to kill you. *EDIT* My ignorance aside, and as it was stated later on here in this thread, I'd imagine a 100% plastic gun would more likely fall apart if it were to be fired more than a handful of times. Increased chance of hurting yourself possibly, maybe not exactly kill you. At any rate, I don't see any major threat with these "firearms" with the current technology of plastics. Metal is still vastly superior in strength than plastics are at this time, unless I'm mistaken. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...set-to-expire/ Last edited by Kimio; November 15, 2013 at 04:16 AM. |
November 14, 2013, 09:44 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
Quote:
|
|
November 14, 2013, 09:55 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
I wonder how well those plastic firing pins work and if it is melted to your hand and on fire after the first round.
Shumer was a key player in the original bill to ban guns that never existed. Maybe they should put more effort into fighting crimes where people actually are getting killed on a daily baisis instead of wasting all their time addressing crimes that do not exist. Last edited by Evan Thomas; November 16, 2013 at 11:08 PM. Reason: redacted invective. |
November 14, 2013, 11:15 AM | #12 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Apparently, Steve Israel introduced a renewal bill earlier this year. I haven't seen text for it yet.
The original Undetectable Firearms Act was signed into law in 1988, and renewed in 2003. It was originally drafted in reaction to the Glock pistols, which as we all know, go right through metal detectors without a peep.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
November 14, 2013, 12:25 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
|
Quote:
Even if the gun lasts for more than one shot the reloading process is not quick (again, IIRC). The whole thing is more proof of concept than anything else. I'm just not thinking any plastic that can be run through a 3D printer is likely to ever stand up to significant chamber pressures... I highly doubt we'll ever see a fully functioning autoloader in a 9x19 or more powerful cartridge made from nothing but plastic. Not with any technology that's currently on the horizon. |
|
November 14, 2013, 01:45 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
I think if I were going to make a "plastic gun", and if I had the skills to do this which I don't, I'd mill most of it, including the barrel out of Delrin.
|
November 14, 2013, 05:07 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2008
Posts: 10,442
|
Purely plastic guns might be undetectable by metal detectors, but what about all the other detection devices in use these days?
Are metal detectors still the ones most encountered?
__________________
Walt Kelly, alias Pogo, sez: “Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent.” |
November 15, 2013, 07:57 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 813
|
Assuming that an all plastic gun could pass thru detectors, what about the ammo? I don't know of any all plastic ammo or did I miss a breakthru somewhere? A gun without ammo is not very effective. I guess it could shoot plastic darts?
__________________
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. |
November 15, 2013, 09:38 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
http://www.policeone.com/Gun-Legisla...daysTopStories
Goes over the basic points from a LEO viewpoint. About ammo - you could come up with nonmetallic ammo if needed. I'll skip giving anyone ideas. I think we had a thread (I started it) about such in Europe and some got about 5 shots out of one of these before failure.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
November 15, 2013, 10:30 PM | #18 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 29, 2013
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 569
|
Even if the gun is plastic and undetectable where are you going to get plastic ammo?
Unless the ammo is hidden in something benign. This was done in an old Clint Eastwood movie. A BG (I think it was john malkovich) tried to shoot the president with a ceramic gun. The BG got through the metal detector with 2 live rounds hidden in a rabbits foot key chain. |
November 16, 2013, 02:14 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
|
Fox news had a disappointing report on this today.
Showed a bunch of people using a printed lower on AR type uppers and went on and on about how the gun could go right through detectors. Also said that somebody was working on a plastic spring for a "clip" and made it sound like the end of the world. The guy being interviewed also went on about how we do not want people to be able to make guns in their garage and we need the law renewed to keep that illegal. Very little of the report was in the realm of reality. Including the fact that people can make guns in there garage and it is not illegal. The interviewer did almost nothing to address the inaccuracies and shortsighted view that was being put forth. He also helped make the guy that released the program to the net look like a cook.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time. No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it. |
November 16, 2013, 02:19 PM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
|
Quote:
They are useless for anything but target practice in the basement and not much good for that. But it would not surprise me to see them on the news portrayed as an undetectable weapon of mass destruction.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time. No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it. |
|
November 16, 2013, 09:43 PM | #21 | ||
Member
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Location: Saint Michael, MN
Posts: 47
|
I was really hoping this would expire without any fan fair. No media group has reported on it for several months. In the last few days everyone has reported on it.
From an article in the Washington Post talking about Steve Israel's (D-NY) anti gun efforts: Quote:
Also from the article: Quote:
The two bills are HR1474 and S1149 http://forums.defcad.com is where most of the 3D printed action is. |
||
November 16, 2013, 10:09 PM | #22 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
The Senate bill has 3 co-sponsors, all of whom are usual suspects.
The House bill has 6. Only on of them (King) has any sort of clout. It's also worth noting that it hasn't picked up any in six months.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
November 16, 2013, 10:20 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,243
|
I might be missing something but other than a general aversion to gun control laws I see the renewal as a non event.
My sticking point is how it is being tied to unrealistic aspects of 3D printing and being sold as a way to keep things illegal that are not presently illegal. I think 3D printing is pretty cool and useful for quickly and cheaply producing 3D models of new products as a proof of concept. But, at this point, it does nothing in the gun world that can not be done with technology from the late 1800's combined with modern plastic and composite materials.
__________________
Seams like once we the people give what, at the time, seams like a reasonable inch and "they" take the unreasonable mile we can only get that mile back one inch at a time. No spelun and grammar is not my specialty. So please don't hurt my sensitive little feelings by teasing me about it. |
November 17, 2013, 12:04 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,800
|
I got the following from a friend by E-mail. Seems like Chuckie is having invisible gun nightmares again. Sorry, he didn't give a link but it should be easy to check out. First three lines in quotation marks are my friends comments. Chuckie strikes again.
Paul B. "You can tell how frightened the politicians are by how soon they try to suppress new technology that might threaten them personally. Sort of like the French aristocracy trying to ban guillotines. Sweat, Chucky, sweat!" Original article is here.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION! Last edited by Tom Servo; November 17, 2013 at 04:55 PM. Reason: Excised copyrighted material |
November 17, 2013, 08:19 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Both NBC and CBS national news shows had a story.
Interesting point - some of the guns blew up on the first shot in ATF tests. Next - the ATF rep that was interviewed mentioned that the gun had little sporting or hunting use. I agree BUT they still don't get the 2nd Amend. If he had said sports, hunting and SD - I might have more respect for them but it sounds like a political position. Chucky says that they should be illegal as terrorists might use them. So how does banning possession do it? Oh, I think I will kill folks for my nutso cause. Oh, maybe not because the gun is illegal so I will not take it on the plane. That is the law. You would have to ban and enforce a law against the printers in common usage.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens Last edited by Glenn E. Meyer; November 18, 2013 at 11:58 AM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|