The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 2, 2013, 09:51 PM   #1
Gunnels
Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 76
HP38 and Winchester 231

Quick question. In reviewing the various reloading post I had a quick and probably dumb question. I have also seen where some people say Winchester 231 is equivalent to HP38. Does that mean they are interchangeable when reloading.

Also, in some reloading tables I have seen they reference a Winchester HP38. On the Winchester website I don't see a Winchester HP38 powder. Are they referring to the Hodgdon HP38 powder?
Gunnels is offline  
Old June 2, 2013, 09:58 PM   #2
Misssissippi Dave
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Posts: 1,411
Only the name changes. All three refer to the same powder.
Misssissippi Dave is offline  
Old June 2, 2013, 09:58 PM   #3
jepp2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,476
Hodgdon HP-38 and Winchester 231 are exactly the same powder. If you go to the Hodgdon cartridge load website link, and look up loads with these powders listed you will find them next to each other with exactly the same numbers.

There are several other powders that are also exactly the same, in some cases one of the powders is no longer available.

There is no Winchester HP-38 that I am aware of.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life member
jepp2 is offline  
Old June 2, 2013, 10:04 PM   #4
wpsdlrg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Posts: 826
Same powder, manufactured by Hodgden. Marketed as both HP38 (Hodgden) and W231 (Winchester).

So, yes, current lots of both are interchangeable. If you find any separate load data listings, which are not identical (I see this on occasion), these are based on different lots....and different "vintages".
wpsdlrg is offline  
Old June 2, 2013, 10:05 PM   #5
Misssissippi Dave
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Posts: 1,411
My understanding is Hodgdon makes the powder and it is sold by Winchester. So HP-38 and Winchester W231 are one in the same. I don't recall which company developed the powder in the first place. I believe it was originally designed to work with .38 loads. That is where Hodgdon got the name for their brand. It also works well in several other calibers. H110 and 296 are also the same powder.
Misssissippi Dave is offline  
Old June 2, 2013, 11:23 PM   #6
Miata Mike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2010
Location: North East WI
Posts: 418
I loaded a bunch of .38 special this last few weeks and used up my HP-38. Loads were very consistent at 3.5 grains. W231 dropped at a very consistent 3.6 grains. Lot variation no doubt, but very much the same powder.
__________________
NRA Life benefactor Member.
Miata Mike is offline  
Old June 2, 2013, 11:43 PM   #7
snuffy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2001
Location: Oshkosh wi.
Posts: 3,055
Quote:
My understanding is Hodgdon makes the powder and it is sold by Winchester. So HP-38 and Winchester W231 are one in the same. I don't recall which company developed the powder in the first place. I believe it was originally designed to work with .38 loads.
Exactly opposite. Winchester, who owned Olin, developed W-231, but sold it in bulk to Hodgdon who packaged it as HP-38. Hodgdon does not make ANY powder. It simply distributes powder, made by other companies. Now they own the distribution rights of former Olin plant called St. Marks. They also own the distribution rights to the former Dupont IMR powder company, and distribute those powders as well.

Here's a list of those powders that have always been the same;

W-296 = H-110
W-231 = HP-38
W-540 = HS-6
W-571 = HS-7

There's others, I can't remember, somebody will be along to fill in the gaps. (thanks Jim!)
__________________
The more people I meet, the more I love my dog

They're going to get their butts kicked over there this election. How come people can't spell and use words correctly?

Last edited by snuffy; June 4, 2013 at 12:05 PM. Reason: clarification
snuffy is offline  
Old June 3, 2013, 07:09 PM   #8
dickttx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2011
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 500
The only difference is that HP38 is $1 per pound cheaper than W231, no matter what size (1#, 4#, 8#).
__________________
Education teaches you the rules, experience teaches you the exceptions (Plagiarized from Claude Clay)
dickttx is offline  
Old June 3, 2013, 07:56 PM   #9
jag2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 30, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 773
You will see different loads for the same bullet with those 2 powders but remember that each company set up there own parameters (barrel length, etc. ) when they were testing so don't let that concern you.
jag2 is offline  
Old June 4, 2013, 06:18 AM   #10
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
don't tell anyone

There is a rumor that old W296 was actually W295.......
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old June 4, 2013, 10:02 AM   #11
black mamba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 890
Yeah, back in the '70s H110 was usually considered a tick slower than W296, and my old manuals support this. Could have just been different lots, who knows . . . .
black mamba is offline  
Old June 4, 2013, 10:12 AM   #12
Swampman1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 17, 2013
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 432
Quote:
Here's a list of those powders that have always been the same;
W-296 = H-110
W-231 = HP-38
W-540 = HS-6
W-571 = HS-7

Here I've been waiting for Win 231, and HP-38 is the same. This is good info to know, I would think important enough to be put in a sticky thread along with other duplicates.

Last edited by Swampman1; June 4, 2013 at 10:18 AM.
Swampman1 is offline  
Old June 4, 2013, 10:41 AM   #13
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Quote:
Yeah, back in the '70s H110 was usually considered a tick slower than W296, and my old manuals support this. Could have just been different lots, who knows
More due to lot to lot variation. The powder we get is mixed with fast and slow lots. The powder manufacturing process cannot make powder precisely.

But for decades, this lot to lot variation was enough that sellers and gunwriters were able to convince the shooting public that there was a difference between brands.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old June 4, 2013, 11:26 AM   #14
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
Hodgdon does not make smokeless powder.
Hodgdon does not own the Ball Powder plant at St Marks, Fla. That is currently a General Dynamics operation, Winchester/Olin has been out of the powder business for some time. The plant was at one time known as Primex but I do not know if that was an Olin or Gendye trademark or if the plant operated as an independent for a while.

Hodgdon does not own the IMR powder plant in Canada, either. That is also a General Dynamics property, DuPont having been out of the powder business for many years.

Hodgdon does not own the ADI powder plant in Australia, for that matter. Thales, a French conglomerate does.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old June 4, 2013, 12:19 PM   #15
snuffy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2001
Location: Oshkosh wi.
Posts: 3,055
Quote:
Hodgdon does not make smokeless powder.
Hodgdon does not own the Ball Powder plant at St Marks, Fla. That is currently a General Dynamics operation, Winchester/Olin has been out of the powder business for some time. The plant was at one time known as Primex but I do not know if that was an Olin or Gendye trademark or if the plant operated as an independent for a while.

Hodgdon does not own the IMR powder plant in Canada, either. That is also a General Dynamics property, DuPont having been out of the powder business for many years.

Hodgdon does not own the ADI powder plant in Australia, for that matter. Thales, a French conglomerate does.
Thanks Jim for that clarification. I know those facts, but my lousy memory leaves out about half.

Hodgdon started his company distributing surplus war powder, mainly 4831 powder used for 30-06. He bought train car loads of it, the returning GI's needed powder for their rifles they brought home.

He expanded his powder lines by buying powder from Olin, then the st. marks powder plant. He packaged it, re-naming it and selling it a bit below what the same stuff cost from Winchester.

Now he has bought the distribution rights to both IMR and the Winchester lines. Some of the powder has been discontinued, you can't find W-571 anymore, but the HS-7 should still be around. Same for W-540, gone but HS-6 is still with us. H-870 is gone as well, that was re-packaged military powder.
__________________
The more people I meet, the more I love my dog

They're going to get their butts kicked over there this election. How come people can't spell and use words correctly?
snuffy is offline  
Old June 5, 2013, 06:35 AM   #16
WESHOOT2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 1999
Location: home on the range; Vermont (Caspian country)
Posts: 14,324
little birdie.......

I have numerous lots of W296, and some H110.

My lots are in no way similar; different physical shape and size, different color, different measured performance.
__________________
.
"all my ammo is mostly retired factory ammo"
WESHOOT2 is offline  
Old June 6, 2013, 06:44 PM   #17
wpsdlrg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Posts: 826
" Winchester, who owned Olin, developed W-231, but sold it in bulk to Hodgdon who packaged it as HP-38. Hodgdon does not make ANY powder. It simply distributes powder, made by other companies."


Thanks for the correction. You are so right. I had forgotten that Hodgdon only distributes powder.

However, I have one small correction, as well. Winchester did not own Olin Corp.....Olin Corp. owned Winchester (Olin absorbed Winchester). There has been NO "Winchester" company for a very long time. Not since 1935, anyway. Anything labeled "Winchester" that is bought today, such as powder, primers, guns, etc.... is made by whatever concern happens to own the rights to the Winchester name currently (the marketing rights have changed hands several times), or whatever out source manufacturer they happen to use. The Winchester name is only for marketing purposes.

P.S. - FN Herstal (FNH) and Browning currently share the rights to use the Winchester name for GUNS....thus, they are the current producers of "Winchester" guns. The Olin Corp. stills owns the rights for all Winchester ammo and reloading components (and presumably produces those, such as HP38 and Win. 231). The "Winchester Repeating Arms" company, as it currently exists.....is only a marketing "shell" corp. - the guns are produced by FNH, Browning and as I understand, certain models by some out-source concern. FNH produces the "Model 70" rifle.

Last edited by wpsdlrg; June 6, 2013 at 07:09 PM.
wpsdlrg is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08980 seconds with 8 queries