The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 21, 2008, 11:28 AM   #1
RobertS
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2008
Posts: 13
Redding Titanium Carbide Sizer Die/Dillon Carbide Sizer Die

I've been reloading 454 and 45 colt cases with a RCBS carbide resizer and run into the problem of the brass hitting the mouth of the die as it enters for resizing. I reload on a progressive press and it is the nature of such a press to have more play with the brass on the shell plate especially with longer brass. Since the lee carbide sizer die is so cheap, I purchased one of them to see if there was any change; it is about the same as the RCBS in regards to hang-ups.

The Redding 454 casull/45 colt pro series dies have the Titanium Carbide Sizer die (87191) in the set and from what I read it is suppose to have a larger radius mouth to assist with progressive reloading. Those of you who own the Redding titanium carbide sizing die: does it have the larger mouth or is it the other dies in the pro series that have the mouth design?

Dillon I have seen and does have the large open mouth as their dies are designed for progressive presses, but they often do not resize as far down as other dies which I have read may lead to problems, but usually only in auto pistols. Also, does the Redding die size further down the brass versus a Dillon die???

Any Ideas?
RobertS is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03974 seconds with 10 queries