January 28, 2013, 11:07 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
Handgun Calibers
So if all handgun calibers are concidered weak and not that effective in stopping the bad guy why do we (self included) spend the extra money on high performance ammo? Seems we may be better off buying the more inexpnensinve types of ammo (FMJ) and getting more time behind the gun?
|
January 28, 2013, 11:10 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2009
Location: Minnesota CZ fan
Posts: 902
|
Because we want every advantage we can get.
Use your pistol to get you to your more effective rifle etc. |
January 28, 2013, 11:12 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,946
|
Quote:
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman |
|
January 28, 2013, 11:24 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
|
I'm not one that thinks that handguns are all that under powered and I'm not one that thinks that ammo you buy in 20 packs is all that much better than the cheaper ammo you buy in 50 packs. But I don't care what you shoot, hand gun, rifle or shotgun, some bullet/ammo designs are far better than others. Take rifles for instance. When things count you couldn't pay me to run FMJ's or solids in it. Easy in, easy out, little else in the middle. Handguns are no different. Does that mean that you have to go out and spend a buck a shot to be well armed, heck no. Take my .357; I'd be just fine with Rem 125gr SP's as anything else.
|
January 28, 2013, 11:40 AM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
|
A .45 Colt with a 300 grain plus hard cast bullet, with a decent meplat, and a hot load, will kill anything on earth with half, or less, of the "power" of a rifle bullet that can't come close to humanely killing "anything on earth." Wound characteristics of rifle bullets are typically different than handguns. Relying on expanding bullets and a handgun is a challenge as rifles have the velocity to destroy a whole lot of tissue with an expanding bullet, whereas the handgun can't match that. But again, a .45 Colt, loaded as noted, will easily out-penetrate any rifle using an expanding bullet.
|
January 28, 2013, 11:44 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Location: Near St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 864
|
It depends on the caliber. With 357 mag, it is hard for a bullet NOT to be effective. Just about any 125 - 158 grain hollowpoint with 500-600 ft-lb of energy is going to have good terminal performance.
Same is true for 10mm. And 44 mag, hot 45 LC (as noted above) and probably 45 ACP+P as well. I don't see how advanced bullet technology is needed with a 200 grain (or heavier) projectile with 500 ft-lb (or more, or a lot more) of energy. Now if we are talking about 38 spcl, or 380, then yes, I think bullet technology can make important improvements. Look at how far the 9mm has come... 30 years ago, 9mm hollowpoints were marginal. Now their terminal performance has been greatly improved. |
January 28, 2013, 01:59 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
|
Quote:
|
|
January 28, 2013, 02:44 PM | #8 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
|
Quote:
Seriously, FMJ in any of the common handgun calibers has a very good chance of over-penetrating ... shooting right through the intended target, and possibly also wounding an innocent person beyond. What we want in a self-defense round is for ALL the bullet's energy to be dissipated in the intended target. That's what modern hollow-point ammunition is designed and intended to do. The expansion creates a larger wound channel, plus the expansion helps prevent over-penetration while maximizing the amount of energy dissipated into the target. |
|
January 28, 2013, 02:59 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 13,195
|
Yes, I hope most of us do both.....
Personally I carry a 5" 1911 in .45 acp ....and I shoot the same model, same mfg gun ...in a 9mm ( 5" 1911 ) to keep my practice ammo more affordable.... and while I shoot some .45 acp ( RN, FMJ as well ) ....I don't shoot the more expensive 230gr Hydra Shok defensive ammo - except once every 3 or 4 yrs - to make sure its still running 100% in the gun..... I try to practice with about 6 - 8 boxes a week ( 300 - 400 rds ) with some tactical drills ( double taps, etc / reload drills, .....).... |
January 28, 2013, 04:42 PM | #10 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 25, 2009
Location: Stuttgart, AR
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
Quote:
1. Less expensive, which should lead to... 2. Getting more time behind the gun. I kick in primary reason number three: 3. Custom tuned loads for your firearm (you can even create something which closely approximates your self defense load for reduced practice cost)
__________________
A lack of planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an emergency on my part. |
||
January 28, 2013, 05:16 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
January 28, 2013, 09:45 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
Personally I do practice with lesser expensive ammo and do feel caliber makes a difference. My experience with handguns on live targets is confined to game animals and livestock. I have seen big differences between loads from the same caliber much less altogether different calibers.
|
January 28, 2013, 10:09 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,176
|
No one thinks the average handgun is as affective as a good centerfire rifle or shotgun, but then, no one really wants to get shot with a handgun, either.
|
January 28, 2013, 10:13 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
Amazing the difference between the "lowly" 30-30 and say the .357 Magnum or similar caliber.
|
January 29, 2013, 01:42 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
__________________
Retired Law Enforcement U. S. Army Veteran Armorer My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon. |
|
January 29, 2013, 02:00 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
|
Quote:
Practicing with FMJ range ammo is certainly fine and encouraged. Heck I use my own lead bullet reloads. I guarantee you though I'm going to want a +P hollowpoint if God forbid I ever have to use my handgun. |
|
January 29, 2013, 09:03 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2013
Posts: 167
|
Quote:
David |
|
January 29, 2013, 06:52 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
. |
|
January 29, 2013, 08:33 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
db4570, good point.
|
January 30, 2013, 11:34 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Posts: 686
|
I don't worry to much about having the latest greatest ammo design. All we could use in the military was FMJ and it works just fine for stopping a threat. I do carry jacketed hps in my edc but my reloads are jacketed rounds. In revolvers my reloads are hard cast lead. I figure if I get down to reloads I need to worry more about penetration through cover.
|
January 31, 2013, 03:23 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,432
|
There are plenty of instances where rifles and shotguns have failed as well.
Unless you have a solid hit on the central nervous system, be prepared to fire again. |
January 31, 2013, 03:51 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: October 4, 2012
Posts: 34
|
I buy expensive ammo to carry because of the effects it will have after shooting at your intended target. I don't want a bullet going through my intended target and possibly causing harm elsewhere. Ammo technology has changed a lot in the years and I'll take every safety precaution when loading my firearms for self defense.
For personal and home defense I like to have hollow points to reduce the chance of something going through my walls and out into the general public, or to keep my bullet inside of my intended target and not through them and onto something else. For the winter I will switch to just a FMJ range round or make sure I'm carrying a +P round since everyone is walking around with so many more layers on. If SHTF, you're right, use whatever you have laying around. For range time I just use the cheapest FMJ round I can find. |
January 31, 2013, 12:23 PM | #23 |
Member in memoriam
Join Date: April 9, 2009
Location: Blue River Wisconsin, in
Posts: 3,144
|
Trucks have more power and Ferrari's are faster so why do most of us drive Chevy's and Fords? Handguns are only weak compared to rifles and it isn't a fair comparison. Unless you have a spare arm or don't mind a long barreled gun slung to your back While you are out and about doing whatever it is you do. The logical choice is something you can carry that is small light, not in the way but sufficient to do the job.
For those of you who have bought into the adage of using it to fight your way to the rifle you are already in to deep for comfort. A few shots with the handgun should end the fight. If you still need to get to a rifle you better have a posse coming to help you soon.
__________________
Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern will, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. --Daniel Webster-- |
January 31, 2013, 01:00 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
|
Much agreed Old Grump. When comparing handguns to rifles there are numbers on paper, there are ballistic test and then there is just plain getting a job done.
|
February 1, 2013, 05:24 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 3, 2008
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 1,269
|
I recently stumbled across this video about gunshot wounds. Not overly descriptive, and gets a bit more into the medical aspect than most people need, but I found it interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXwPtP-KDNk
__________________
“There are three reasons to own a gun. To protect yourself and your family, to hunt dangerous and delicious animals, and to keep the King of England out of your face.” - Krusty the Clown Last edited by The Great Mahoo; February 1, 2013 at 05:32 PM. |
|
|