The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 8, 2014, 11:36 AM   #1
Mr. Mike
Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2011
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 26
Questions on max loads.

Just getting back into reloading. I do start low and work up to loads and not all that interested in getting the hottest loads or the fastest velocities. I have gathered 8 different reloading information forms. I will only use the 5 that show the specific powder and bullet weights. This will all be for .308 Win., IMR 4064 powder, and 150 gr. sp bullet. This is what I found to be the listed max loads/fps for the above information:
1. max load 44.9 gr/ 2700 fps
2. max load 44.9 gr/2800 fps
3. max load 48.2 gr/2900 fps
4. max load 48.0 gr/2920 fps
5. max load 47.7 gr/2902 fps
OK, I know that different barrels and lengths will change things a bit but given the same powder and the same projectile one would think the difference between max loads would not be as far apart as 3.3 grs? I am sure that once I start to work up a load and examine each increase for signs of pressure I will arrive at my own max load but just trying to understand these differences from the so called manuals. Anyone have any ideas why this is?
__________________
All behavior is chosen!
Mr. Mike is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 11:40 AM   #2
jwrowland77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2012
Location: Conway, Arkansas
Posts: 1,398
Each one has their own testing barrels and lawyers.

Situation like this, I go with Powder Manufacture as long as they have data listed for the bullet I'm doing.


That's what I did when I did my workup of IMR 4064 using a 175gr SMK.
jwrowland77 is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 12:43 PM   #3
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Each barrel's bore and groove diameters could vary enough to cause a 3 grain spread in powder for the same visual pressure signs. There's easily a .002" spread in a .308 Win. barrel's groove diameter and .003" spread in bullet diameters. A big diameter bullet shot in a small groove diameter barrel will have very high pressures for even some suggested starting loads.

And 3 different people will have 3 different interpretations of given pressure signs for a given load.

All of which means most load estimates for data are measured with a rubber ruler and how much it's stretched to meet the loader's objectives.

Best sources, in my opinion, are those from powder companies listing pressure data derived from proper measuring systems and bullet companies testing their products.
Bart B. is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 01:32 PM   #4
SpringOWeiler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 28, 2014
Location: Washington (Dry Side)
Posts: 116
I always recommend choosing the suggested accuracy load given by the manufacturer.
SpringOWeiler is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 02:27 PM   #5
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Reloading manuals are a guide. Your rifle will be different. Since the slope of the pressure curve is exponential, tiny changes in anything mean huge changes in pressure.

I do recommend load testing over a chronograph, since there is “no free lunch”. If velocities over the chronograph exceed book values, you can bet that pressures are exceeding maximum, even if the classic symptoms of sticky bolt lift or blown primers are not evident. I am of the opinion that if I see classic over pressure symptoms, I exceeded a maximum load a long time before.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 06:08 PM   #6
NWPilgrim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
Questions on max loads.

Powder lots can vary 5-10% as well. All the variables added together can stack differently.

I would start below 44 gr for sure. And consider the 44/49 gr range as a "watch carefully" zone.
NWPilgrim is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 06:23 PM   #7
pathdoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
What they've all said.

The big issue is how they do the testing. Variables such as the type of brass, the primer used, the firearm used (pressure barrel versus sporting or milsurp) and its barrel length, how many rounds that barrel has fired, etc. can all gang up to change things. Not all shoots can always be done at standard temperature and pressure on a climate-controlled range, which means that those variables have to be corrected, either by firing against reference ammo which IS shot at STP or by correcting it mathematically against prevailing conditions (whose measurement might have errors). Gain or loss of velocity per inch of barrel length is dependent on the actual velocity, and MAY be dependent upon the nature of the powder. The composition of the bullet can radically change the way it behaves in the barrel, even for the same bullet weight, primer, and powder charge. 150gn sp (assuming you mean spitzer or softpoint or both) can cover a lot of territory.
pathdoc is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 06:43 PM   #8
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
Use this!

http://www.hodgdonreloading.com/
steve4102 is offline  
Old May 8, 2014, 08:08 PM   #9
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
With a 22" 308 surplus 4895 [read H322] 150 gr Sierra I got 3050 fps and groups ok, but 3100 fps and all loose primer pockets.

By the time I backed off a safety margin I would be down to 2900 fps or less.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old May 16, 2014, 11:52 AM   #10
Mr. Mike
Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2011
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 26
I surely do wish to thank all those who offered their views on my question. I guess that I will continue to do what I did all those years ago....start low and work my way up to the loads that give me the best consistent accuracy with out any signs of excessive pressure.
Again, thanks.
Mike
__________________
All behavior is chosen!
Mr. Mike is offline  
Old May 17, 2014, 08:16 AM   #11
Hunter Customs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 26, 2005
Location: Osborn, Missouri
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
I surely do wish to thank all those who offered their views on my question. I guess that I will continue to do what I did all those years ago....start low and work my way up to the loads that give me the best consistent accuracy with out any signs of excessive pressure.
Again, thanks.
Mike
That's my thoughts and the way I do it Mike, I'll always sacrifice velocity for better accuracy.

Best Regards
Bob Hunter
www.huntercustoms.com
Hunter Customs is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06232 seconds with 10 queries