May 21, 2013, 06:49 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: February 6, 2008
Posts: 26
|
Colt DA41 question
So I have this 92 NAVY and was thinking about two things. Parting it out to Numrich or trying to restore it at God knows what cost and something that I will never shoot. Any suggestions?
__________________
"Fear the man who owns only one gun. Because it's probably a 30-30 and he knows how to use it" |
May 21, 2013, 07:32 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,678
|
|
May 21, 2013, 07:43 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: February 6, 2008
Posts: 26
|
I have seen them on GB but they dont go for very much and nobody is going to want to pay FFL fees on something like this. Or if they do they are stupid.
__________________
"Fear the man who owns only one gun. Because it's probably a 30-30 and he knows how to use it" |
May 21, 2013, 07:53 PM | #4 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
You won't get anything by selling it to a parts house. Is it functional? If so, it is worth $50-75 or so. If not, it is about worthless.
There are parts in those guns that often break and are in demand. Trouble is that they are the ones that always break, so a part that is broken in other guns is likely to be the part that is broken in that gun. Jim |
May 22, 2013, 01:25 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
See if its an antique before you go to sell it. Check out the SN here:
http://proofhouse.com/colt/index.html According to proofhouse, before 115000 its an antique because in 1899 they started with 115000. An antique can be shipped to anyone in the US via the USPS, as long as you don't have knowledge of that person being prohibited. An antique, before 1899 production, does not need a pistol transfer. Of course some states and localities may differ, but I am quoting the federal law, which works most places. Check local laws just to be safe.
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
May 22, 2013, 10:59 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: February 6, 2008
Posts: 26
|
There is no serial number. It just says property of US NAVY. And even if it is an antique it still takes a modern cartridge, so no that wont work. However the law says "ammo that is readily commercially available" We all know that hardly any ammo is commercially or readily available so we should be able to ship 1911's and glocks door to door HA!
Dumbass government. Man I hate them.
__________________
"Fear the man who owns only one gun. Because it's probably a 30-30 and he knows how to use it" |
May 23, 2013, 12:09 AM | #7 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/collectors.html Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
||
May 23, 2013, 01:10 PM | #8 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Would it be possible to post a photo of the butt markings and the area with the property mark?
The U.S. never adopted any revolver in .41 caliber, though it is possible a few were purchased for testing. However, I have seen one in .41 caliber that had fake Navy markings. Jim |
May 24, 2013, 07:00 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|
May 24, 2013, 10:46 PM | #10 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
But Colt did make civilian revolvers, in both .38 and .41, that they called the "Colt Army" and the "Colt Navy" revolvers. These were NOT contract guns, the terms were just Colt advertising hype. The only difference was the grips (the ones on the OP's revolver are the "Navy" grips) and the small letter N for the Navies under the crane. So the OP is correct in saying his gun is a Colt Navy; it is just not a "Navy Navy".
That is why I am surprised that it would be marked as Navy property, and wonder if the marking is bogus. Jim |
May 25, 2013, 11:40 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
As I said Jim, "contract" guns, referring to "US military contract". However, I do know what you mean about the civilian names for these Colt DAs. I have one myself, I believe mine is a "Navy" and it is model 1896 from 1897. Original nickel.
Too much glare in the photos...
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|
|